About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Did Fox News approve its hosts' speeches to these groups?

October 29, 2009 9:58 am ET — 19 Comments

In an article on Fox Business analyst John Stossel's scheduled anti-health care reform speeches for the conservative group Americans for Prosperity, The New York Times reported that a "Fox spokesperson said all speeches given by employees require approval from the network and said his Arkansas appearances were arranged before he was a Fox employee." Media Matters for America has assembled a list of recent speeches given by Fox News hosts Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, and Mike Huckabee, as well as Fox News political contributor Newt Gingrich, in which they appeared before conservative political organizations or endorsed Republican candidates, reinforcing the fact that Fox News is itself a conservative political organization.

NYT: Fox spokesperson says network approves employees' speeches

From the October 27 Times article:

Mr. Stossel had delivered speeches to political groups long before joining Fox. While working at ABC,where he was the co-anchor of "20/20," he was allowed to deliver speeches to Americans for Prosperity and other organizations. An ABC spokesman said Mr. Stossel had a long-standing arrangement with the network to donate all money from speaking engagements to charity.

On Tuesday, Mr. Stossel said, "My understanding is that Fox folks are free to give speeches." A Fox spokesperson said all speeches given by employees require approval from the network, and said his Arkansas appearances were arranged before he was a Fox employee.

Huckabee, Gingrich spoke at CPAC 2009

Fox personalities spoke at convention for conservative activists. According to the website of the American Conservative Union, "Since 1973, the ACU Foundation has hosted the annual Conservative Political Action Conference [CPAC], where thousands of conservative activists and leaders from across the country join together for a three-day event to discuss current issues and policies and to set the agenda for the future of the conservative movement." CPAC 2010 cosponsors include Americans for Tax Reform, FreedomWorks, Media Research Center, and Townhall. In 2009, Huckabee and Gingrich spoke at CPAC; Rush Limbaugh was the keynote speaker.

Hannity, Huckabee, O'Reilly have spoken at Values Voter Summits

Fox hosts spoke at summit for the religious right. The Values Voter Summit is sponsored by FRC Action, "the legislative action arm of Family Research Council," and co-sponsored by groups including the American Family Association, Focus on the Family Action, and The Heritage Foundation. 2009 speakers included several conservative Republicans and members of various conservative political organizations. Hannity spoke at the 2006 Summit, while O'Reilly and Huckabee spoke at the 2009 summit. O'Reilly received the Media Courage Award; his speech was reportedly closed to the press.

Huckabee, Hannity have given speeches boosting conservative candidates

Huckabee was keynote speaker at campaign event for Vander Plaats. According to Huckabee's Iowa coordinator, Lori Jungling, during a June speech, Huckabee endorsed Iowa gubernatorial candidate Bob Vander Plaats. In a blog post, Jungling wrote that Huckabee "stated that what Vander Plaats stands for is more than a political position; it is who he is and what his life is about and because of this his positions will not change according to which way the wind blows."

Huckabee spoke at campaign event for Kasich. On October 13, Huckabee appeared at a campaign event for Ohio gubernatorial candidate and former Fox News host John Kasich.

Hannity reportedly introduced GOP presidential hopeful Giuliani at fundraiser. Hannity reportedly "introduced the Republican front-runner [Rudy Giuliani] at a closed-door, $250-per-head fundraiser Aug. 9 in Cincinnati, campaign officials acknowledge." Hannity's "bosses at Fox News Channel and WABC, flagship station for his national radio show, defended their marquee star by arguing that he's not a journalist and shouldn't be judged as one. 'Sean is not a journalist - Sean is a conservative commentator,' said Bill Shine, Fox's senior vice president of programming. 'Sean doesn't hide, and never has hidden, his beliefs from anyone.' " [NY Daily News 08/17/2007]

Hannity "helped rally Santorum supporters" during Senate race. According an October 2006 report by National Review Online's Kathryn Jean Lopez, Hannity "helped rally [Rick] Santorum supporters in the most Republican county in the state for their get-out-the-vote effort. [...] Hannity emphasized voter duty: 'The senator has done his job. And he can't win without your support.' Hannity made clear, always to audible audience agreement: 'The stakes could not be higher. ...This election means everything.' He encouraged those gathered to work toward 'a presidential turnout.' " Lopez further reported: "As Sean Hannity put it on Saturday night, 'I've seen a lot of politicians in my day, but I've seen very few leaders.' Rick Santorum's been 'a consistent leader' and is one of 'the right men in the right place at the right time' in the Senate." [National Review Online 10/30/2006]

Speeches at other political events

Gingrich was keynote speaker at House/Senate GOP fundraising dinner. Gingrich was the keynote speaker at a June 9 fundraising dinner for the Senate and House Republican campaign committees. The dinner's guest list reportedly "included 33 Republican senators and Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele" and "raised $14.45 million for congressional Republicans, money that will be split evenly between the Senate and House campaign committees as they seek to win back majorities in next year's midterm elections."

Huckabee spoke at "How to Take Back America" conference. On September 26, Huckabee spoke at the "How To Take Back America" conference, the annual conference of Phyllis Schlafly's Eagle Forum, which calls itself "the most effective national organization of 80,000 men and women who share conservative and pro-family values." Other conference hosts include the American Family Association and WorldNetDaily.

Hannity spoke at Faith and Freedom Coalition event. Hannity gave a speech at the August 22 Faith and Freedom Coalition's Freedom Rally. The Coalition's goal is to "influence public policy and enact legislation that strengthens families, promotes time-honored values, protects the dignity of life and marriage, lowers the tax burden on small business and families, and requires government to tighten its belt and live within its means."

Gingrich spoke at Heritage Foundation. On July 20, Gingrich gave a speech on national security at the Heritage Foundation, whose mission is to "formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense."

Fox News is a conservative political organization

"Voice of the opposition": Fox News openly advocates against Democratic Congress, White House. Since President Obama's inauguration, Fox News has frequently engaged in political advocacy against the Democratic Congress and White House. Specifically, Fox News personalities have promoted and encouraged viewers to "join" tea party protests, Glenn Beck's organization The 9-12 Project and its September 12 "March on Washington," and town hall meetings; engaged in a witch hunt seeking to "get rid of" Obama administration officials and nominees; implored viewers to call Congress and the White House to protest Democratic policies; and celebrated "victor[ies]" when Democratic legislation has been stalled.

Research and communications arm: Fox News is home to GOP in exile. A revolving door exists between the Republican Party and Fox News Channel, with a number of former Bush administration officials, former and potentially future GOP presidential candidates, and Republican strategists on Fox's payroll and airwaves. A Media Matters for America review of Fox coverage since September 1 reveals that these individuals, typically hosted alone or on unbalanced panels, often use their airtime to advance false and misleading claims about Democrats and progressives, as well as to fundraise, further demonstrating that Fox is effectively a conservative political organization and not a legitimate news outlet.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (October 29, 2009 10:08 am ET)
      7  
      Is John Stossel employed by FOX on its "opinion" side or its "news" side?

      Inasmuch as FOX makes that distinction when trying to refute the assertion that it is not a legitimate news organization, FOX should clearly label each and every one of its talking heads.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Appleboy (October 29, 2009 10:49 am ET)
        7  
        Off topic but....

        The idea voiced by Fox and MS media (liberals included) that opinion shows shouldn't be subject to criticism is about as dumb as it gets. Apparently it is ok dokey for an individual to lie/distort/smear as long as it is done under the banner of opinion. You want to misinform millions of people? That's just fine. Just make sure you clarify it's opinion or perhaps humor.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (October 29, 2009 11:13 am ET)
          3  
          Well, their "clarification" implies, as we often see their defense here from posters, that our "objections" are based in our rejection of their political philosophy and their opinion.

          That's why they do it. They are not admitting that they distort or smear. They are simply trying to be consistent, as it were, in saying that our objections are to their opinion. Of course that's not true, but that doesn't stop them from saying it.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by smarshall1432997 (October 29, 2009 1:33 pm ET)
          3 1
          We just wonder why Jake Tapper at ABC, and poor Campbell Brown at CNN do "NOT" get the difference of "opinion" versus "news" from FoxNews? How "hard" can this really be, LOL.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Appleboy (October 29, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
            2 1
            My point is that there should be NO difference between news and opinion when it comes to criticism of these programs when they say things that are untrue or that tend to mislead people. Nobody is questioning the rights "opinion programs" to give their opinions. What's stupid is for them or anybody to suggest they shouldn't be held accountable for lies they may spread to millions.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by fairliberal (October 29, 2009 11:26 pm ET)
              4
            Speaking of Campbell Brown, she did expose the hypocrisy of the Obama administration in her interview of adviser Jarrett. When asked if Fox was biased she replied of course, when asked if MSNBC is biased , she said she didn't want to get into classifying networks. What a hypocrite. Maybe she and the rest of the Obama administration would prefer if they got to approve all broadcasts before hand. I wonder if Obama is considering the floggings that are practiced with journalists in Saudi Arabia. He's taken the first step. Who knows what is next? Change we can believe in?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by latichever (October 30, 2009 8:26 am ET)
              3  
              Unfortunately, Gibbs and Jarrett have not been adequately briefed about Fox. The point is not that the opinion shows are biased--at Fox and MSNBC--but that Fox's putative news shows are similarly biased--as has been documented at Media Matters and a host of other places and is easily apparent to anyone who watches.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by skatscan5624 (October 31, 2009 8:51 pm ET)
                 
              Where's the hypocrisy? MSNBC is so low rated with a viewership of 12 (According To Fox viewers) how would she know or anyone know whether MSNBC has a left wing bias?

              MSNBC however has an EQUAL amount of time with right wing hosts and left wing hosts. That seems like balance to me.

              They're not FAIR like FOX, They're more professional and less mediocre than FOX.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by Canadian Observer (October 29, 2009 4:21 pm ET)
          2  
          A huge part of this problem is that it isn't actually under the banner of opinion; there is a little Fox News logo spinning around with it's Fair and Balanced tag line. There should be a static disclaimer stating that the opinion pieces are purely opinion for entertainment purposes only. When did ethics in journalism get thrown out the window? Why aren't there more peer groups trying to end this madness?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (October 29, 2009 1:30 pm ET)
        4 1
        I agree,

        The FCC should require Fox News to air a disclaimer every, say, 15 minutes, informing viewers that the station has been responsible in the past for a multitude of smears and outright lies.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by rms (October 29, 2009 2:18 pm ET)
        1  
        Well, Bret Hume was a "news" person Monday through Friday, but an "opinion" person on Sunday morning.

        I think.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nitwhits3702 (October 29, 2009 12:33 pm ET)
      1  
      The title of this article really got me excited to see a distinct link between between Fox News management and the content of it's employee's speeches. It's a little dissapointing that the NY Times article only quotes an unnamed Fox Spokesperson to make this connection. I mean, there are plenty of other examples of activism from Fox's news arm, but this could have been a real zinger.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Byte Man (October 29, 2009 7:49 pm ET)
      2  
      Honestly, is this "new" to anyone with a brain who's been watching the actual news since MindFox first started?

      MindFox: "We Lie, 24/7!"
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Not_a_sheep (October 30, 2009 5:50 pm ET)
           
        Yes, MM is oh so pure, aren't you?

        "While purporting to hold the media to high standards, Media Matters traffics in gossip and finger-pointing. It’s striking that so many wealthy liberal donors and foundations have committed major sums to this online start-up operation created by a discredited political operative. That they are prepared to get down and dirty testifies to the anger and desperation they must feel." by Rondi Adamson

        Loved this:) Found it to be so well stated and couldn't have said it better myself, even though I do have a brain.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by PeterTB (October 30, 2009 2:48 am ET)
        3
      "formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense."

      You say that like it's a bad thing!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (October 31, 2009 4:41 pm ET)
        2  
        Well, considering just where those "conservative public policies" have landed us...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by m.heft8723 (November 01, 2009 12:48 am ET)
             
          i am so glad to learn that so many agree that the FCC should insist that all "news" shows that are stating opinion should be labeled as "OPINIONATED." The FCC, years ago, took their orders from a federal judge that the media is merely "public discourse" and, therefore, not subject to truth or propganda regulations.
          How do we go about insisting that truth be returned to media? How do we mount a campaign? I realize that there are several ethical journalism organizations, but, by the time those organizations can refute FOX's "spin" on a topic, so much time has gone by that those who consider FOX, for instance, "fair and well-balanced," do not bother to search the truth from these truth in media publications. In fact, they don't seem to want to know the truth; FOX gives these viewers the satisfaction of appealing to what they want to believe, anyway--the seeking of truth is not on their agenda.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by hockeyrw (October 30, 2009 4:53 pm ET)
         
      The only channel the KKK will watch. The good thing is it owned by a foreigner, trying to run America into the ground. Divide and concur, not fair and balanced.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.