About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

More Fox fabrication: falsely claims Philly ACORN video shows "unlawful actions"

October 22, 2009 7:14 pm ET — 80 Comments

Following the release of what Fox News itself called "heavily edited tape" of conservative James O'Keefe's visit to a Philadelphia ACORN office, Fox News ran captions stating, "Exposing ACORN: New Video Shows Unlawful Actions." In fact, in the heavily edited video, there is no evidence of any ACORN worker engaged in any "unlawful actions," and moreover, ACORN workers filed an incident report with Philadelphia police following O'Keefe's visit.

Fox & Friends on-screen text: O'Keefe's video of Philly ACORN visit "shows unlawful actions"

During the 8 a.m. ET hour of the October 22 edition of Fox & Friends, Fox ran the following caption:

In fact, there is no evidence in O'Keefe's video that any worker in the Philadelphia ACORN office engaged in any "unlawful actions." In the video released on Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com on October 21, the audio and video of O'Keefe and Hannah Giles' July 24 visit with Katherine Conway-Russell at the Philadelphia ACORN office have been heavily edited. Many of Russell's statements in the video of the office visit were edited out and replaced with audio of O'Keefe purporting to explain what she said, but nothing in the video supports the claim that Philadelphia ACORN workers actually assisted O'Keefe and Giles with any "unlawful actions." As Fox News reported: "The new eight-minute video depicts O'Keefe and Giles entering ACORN's Philadelphia office and meeting with Conway-Russell. O'Keefe and Giles are seen speaking with Conway-Russell, but audio portions of the video are missing or edited in some portions." O'Keefe later stated, "We muted the audio of the ACORN employees on the video" because of "ACORN's legal attack upon us."

Philadelphia ACORN office called the police on O'Keefe

ACORN released police report following O'Keefe's visit. ACORN has publicly released a July 24 Philadelphia police report stating that an ACORN employee complained to police that O'Keefe had created a "verbal disturbance" at ACORN's office.

Russell can be seen holding police report in O'Keefe's October 21 video. O'Keefe's video shows footage from Russell's September 17 YouTube video in which she made statements about O'Keefe and Giles' visit to the Philadelphia ACORN office. Russell said that following O'Keefe's visit, "We called the police and filed this report." In his October 21 video, O'Keefe does not dispute that ACORN filed a police report about his visit.

Fox has history of false attacks, smears using O'Keefe's ACORN videos

Fox News runs with San Bernardino ACORN video without needed fact check. On September 15 and 16, Fox News devoted significant programming to O'Keefe and Giles' video of their interactions with a San Bernardino ACORN worker who claimed she murdered her ex-husband and gave advice on how to run a brothel, but stated after the video was released that she had merely been attempting to "shock them as much as they were shocking me." In running with the video, Fox News hosts frequently promoted the fake claim that the ACORN employee killed her ex-husband without fact-checking the allegation or indicating that they had contacted ACORN for a response. In fact, ACORN called the video "an obvious set of lies and manipulations," and the San Bernardino Police Department found her former husbands "alive and well."

Chris Wallace attacks Media Matters on conservative funding of videographers, ignores Media Matters' evidence. On the September 27 edition of Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace stated: "O'Keefe wants to set the record straight. He denies reports on left-wing blogs he got any money from conservative backers." During that statement, Fox displayed an image of Media Matters' home page followed by an image of a Media Matters item that documented statements by conservative media figures that they were raising money for O'Keefe's and Giles' legal defense or that they would be willing to do so in the future --- information Wallace ignored. Wallace also ignored a September 22 Village Voice report -- noted by Media Matters -- that the spokesperson for conservative investor Peter Thiel acknowledged that Thiel had contributed "about $10,000" to an earlier video that O'Keefe released in February 2009.

Wallace also ignored Fox reporting that some ACORN employees "did the right thing." Wallace reported: "O'Keefe wants to set the record straight. ... And he says he'll release all the tapes soon to show if any ACORN offices did the right thing." Wallace then added, "Why not release all the tapes at the start?" and proceeded to air video of O'Keefe saying, "We knew that they would lie and they would say, 'Oh, you've got nothing,' or 'You're dubbing your voice in.' But you release a little bit at a time, and they get caught in their lie." However, on September 22, Fox News' Megyn Kelly reported: "[I]t appears that not every ACORN worker did go along with it. ACORN had been saying that the purported pimp and prostitute had failed in certain offices to actually convince the ACORN workers for help, and police in California say one ACORN worker at one office out there did, in fact, contact them after the filmmakers approached him about this human smuggling ring, or this trafficking ring. That worker realizing several days later that the whole thing was a hoax, but as ACORN pointed out when this thing first broke, some of their workers did the right thing."

Indeed, the Associated Press reported:

Police say a worker with the activist group ACORN who was caught on video giving advice about human smuggling to a couple posing as a pimp and a prostitute had reported the incident to authorities.

National City police said Monday that Juan Carlos Vera contacted his cousin, a police detective, to get advice on what to with information on possible human smuggling.

Vera was secretly filmed on Aug. 18 as part of a young couple's high-profile expose.

Police say he contacted law enforcement two days later. The detective consulted another police official who served on a federal human smuggling task force, who said he needed more details.

The ACORN employee responded several days later and explained that the information he received was not true and he had been duped. [AP, 9/22/09]

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Bad News (October 22, 2009 7:30 pm ET)
      4 5
      Can Fox News even Spell the Truth?


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bad News (October 22, 2009 7:36 pm ET)
        2 5
        News Corp. "A Racist Enterprise"
        They Hired Mark Furman a Man Convicted of Telling Lies.
        For Mark Furman the "N" word is considered a Casual Noun.
        Who Vouched for this Guy, Bill-O the Clown?

        Speak truth to power.


        Mr. News
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bad News (October 22, 2009 7:43 pm ET)
          2 4
          If i Attacked a Woman i would be so Ashamed?
          I would look at the "Man in the Mirror" & myself is who i would Blame.
          I wouldn't hide behind my Attorney or try to have the Records Sealed.
          What's the matter Bill O'Reilly? Did Andrea Mackris have you afraid of an Appeal?

          Speak truth to power.


          Mr. News
          Report Abuse
          • Author by usp (October 22, 2009 9:37 pm ET)
            2 1
            he's a great american. people say it all the time. geez BN...he's looking out for you!

            ...gag...vomit...apologize
            Report Abuse
        • Author by loogie (October 22, 2009 10:40 pm ET)
          2 5
          Exactly Brad, MSNBC should be taken off the air.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Cinque (October 22, 2009 9:59 pm ET)
        3 13
        ACORN = Evil
        Report Abuse
    • Author by sluggo (October 22, 2009 7:38 pm ET)
      9 1
      Since FOX has long ago given up even the pretense of being a news organization, I don't know why they don't just use Photoshop and make up their own news pictures.

      Why not just start creating pictures of Obama and Mao sharing a beer, or a picture of an ACORN office with guns on the table? Both kinds of pictures are easily done with a digital editing program.

      Since they are not a news organization and they don't have to fact check anything, and Murdock can pretty well fight off any legal challenges, I am really amazed that the best they can come up with is truncating real quotes and cutting real video.

      Making up stuff is so much easier (as long as the companies that purchase ad time are ok with it).
      Report Abuse
    • Author by srichardson (October 22, 2009 8:57 pm ET)
      8  
      Is it really legal for someone to videotape another person and then flash their face all over the world on the television accusing them of illegal activity? It's hard for me to imagine that this is legal. This poor lady. Based on what these right wing freaks are saying she is a horrible person helping a prostitute break the law. I feel bad for this woman. Can you imagine the looks she gets when she walks out of her home now? It's immoral for someone to do this. Fox news should know better and think before they decide to ruin some poor innocent woman's life.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by usp (October 22, 2009 9:40 pm ET)
        5  
        no doubt. look at that woman. she it totally interested in getting through the day and going home- just like every body freakin' else.

        but she gets gamed by these attention whores who have nothing in mind but self promotion. thought they were going to drift off into the past- but then the balloon boy story happened. they had to catch up
        Report Abuse
        • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 1:56 am ET)
          3 13
          ***It's the same old song, but with a different meaning since you been gone***... huh what am I up? Has Bad News finished his four or five barely coherent off topic posts at the start of every thread? He has? Have the usual cast of characters shown their admiration for his witty repartee? They have? Oh, okay, here goes:
          *ahem*
          Oh the horror! Poor ACORN lady, she was just trying to help a poor "Ho" work her way into starting a small business and hire some unemployed teen girls. She's trying to help the economy; it's stimulus! I feel terrible for her. These evil people, making this video. Liars and the evil FNC, teabaggers, right-wing wackos, and worst of all possibly REPUBLICANS! Oh yeah, I almost forgot; Bill O'Reilly is a rapist! Huh...what? Racist? Yeah that too! They're all racists! Poor ACORN, doesn't anyone see this is a vast right-wing conspiracy against them...What?...They're getting back their federal funding at the end of the month?...Never mind... One last thing; FAUX News (aren't I clever?) is a racist institution and they make up the news to hurt black people, small animals, and the environment too; and anyone who watches them hates the President because they are neo-conservative, racist teabagging Republicans...Yeah...so there! (Glen Beck sucks too!)

          Well that about sums it up...carry on.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pilotx (October 23, 2009 2:16 am ET)
            10 1
            Well Liberty I guess your take is that ACORN is a dastardly evil organization bent on enslaving third world girls and steal elections and must be destroyed at all cost. Geez. After personally seeing the work ACORN does I think they are a necessary component in certain communities. To me they are not some far flung group like most FOX viewers see them. They are a real organization that has actually helped people I know. Thing is FOX doesn't care about people who do not look like them or occupy a different income bracket but to us this crap hits home. I think it sucks that people lost their jobs in this economy because two snotty nosed rich kids wanted to dirty up ACORN for whatever reason. Go after them for things they actually did, don't go entrapping folks and making stuff up but this is nothing new for "conservatives" and their campaign to defund the left.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 11:39 am ET)
              1 9
              Well actually I don't believe that community organizations ought to be funded by Federal Tax dollars on the left or the right, but that's a political philosophical argument based on that pesky document that both sides left and right seem to ignore when it suits them. When ACORN as an organization throws itself into the business of supporting a particular candidate, they are no longer simply community organizers trying to help folks, much that same way FNC is not a legitimate news organization for supporting a political agenda. The difference is ACORN is publically funded. As far as helping people goes? I'm all for it. But you see the term "snotty nosed rich kids" that smacks of the class warfare BS that the left loves to lean on. Look if you want to politically use the power of central government to level the social and economic disparity between the rich and the poor in this country, that's your call. I don't believe, based on my reading, that is the purpose of the Federal Government. Just to address the "corporate welfare" argument, I disagree with that as well. You might know a little something of my family background if you read my posts so I have little sympathy for those who sit like little baby birds waiting to be fed by government or people on the public payroll who are stupid enough to put their jobs in jeopardy by breaching ethical standards or supporting criminal activity whether that criminal activity was real or not (the legal term is "intent"). It's not entrapment, by the way:
              there is no entrapment where a person is ready and willing to break the law and the government agents merely provide what appears to be a favorable opportunity for the person to commit the crime.
              So you can erase that misconception from your repetoire. The problem with people on either extreme of the political spectrum is that they only think it's unethical when the other guy is doing it.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by ScienceBuff (October 23, 2009 11:52 am ET)
                5  
                When ACORN as an organization throws itself into the business of supporting a particular candidate, they are no longer simply community organizers trying to help folks, - libertycop

                I'm not aware that ACORN has ever done that, so you may rest easy on that point.

                The difference is ACORN is publically funded. - libertycop

                No, for the most part they get very little in public funds. Most of what they do get is passed through to those in need where ACORN is helping them take advantage a particular program. ACORN is mainly a conduit for getting the money to qualified recipients. ACORN does not get public funding to put in their coffers for general operational uses.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 1:24 pm ET)
                  1 8
                  I'm not aware that ACORN has ever done that, so you may rest easy on that point.

                  ACORN didn't support one candidate over another in the last general election? Key words "not aware" Because that's not what I observed in my area, and I'm not talking on FNC, I'm talking first hand.
                  No, for the most part they get very little in public funds. Most of what they do get is passed through to those in need where ACORN is helping them take advantage a particular program. ACORN is mainly a conduit for getting the money to qualified recipients. ACORN does not get public funding to put in their coffers for general operational uses.

                  So let me get this straight. It's okay to engage in unethical or illegal behavior as long as you are only distributing public funds but not using public funds for operations? I disagree. Put on the logic goggles for just a moment and think if this were a right leaning organization that was distributing government funds to wealthy people and appeared to be offering advice on how to conceal and profit from criminal enterprise. Outrage would be justified. Guess for me that door swings both ways. To quote one of the left-wing posters from right here in MM "It's the ethics stupid." (Just to be clear I'm not calling you stupid) ACORN needed a good hard look, and these kids sparked that look, so let's beat them up.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by ScienceBuff (October 23, 2009 2:14 pm ET)
                    6  
                    No, ACORN did not support one candidate over another. Please feel free to provide any facts or evidence that shows they did beyond your unsupported general impressions.

                    So let me get this straight. It's okay to engage in unethical or illegal behavior as long as you are only distributing public funds but not using public funds for operations? - libertycop

                    No, you don't have that straight. I didn't say anything remotely similar. I was correcting you on your assertion that ACORN was publicly funded.

                    Regarding the rest, I'm very skeptical about what is on those videos. I've expanded on this in other MMFA articles, but the short version is that I don't believe that the ACORN workers heard the same questions and statements live that we heard from the off-camera voice in the video. The responses just don't match up.

                    Finally, I'm well aware of the excellent work ACORN has done over the decades helping to implement programs aimed at the poor honestly and efficiently. It would prevent a lot of good from being done to cut off all funding through ACORN because of the possibly unethical actions of a couple of workers. The reaction is grossly disproportionate to the actual offense.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 23, 2009 2:22 pm ET)
                      7  
                      "Please feel free to provide any facts or evidence that shows they did beyond your unsupported general impressions." - ScienceBuff

                      Well sure, if you are going to hold libertycop to those kind of impossible standards then forget it. If he actually cared about facts and evidence wouldn't he want to see unedited versions of these prank videos before assuming that anything they had to offer was legitimate. And, if these unedited videos actually showed any illegal activity, wouldn't they have already been turned over to the authorities?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 3:27 pm ET)
                          7
                        Oh my god! You guys just convinced me that I didn't see what I actually witnessed! Amazing!
                        LOL!
                        Unfortunately I didn't take any hidden camera video. Not that that would convince you either...Please.

                        Regardless, no funds should be passing from the Federal Government through ACORN or any other organization, but that's a moot point here.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by ScienceBuff (October 23, 2009 4:07 pm ET)
                          5  
                          I'm basing my opinion on what I actually did see and hear. When the video stories first broke I thought "This sounds bad." Especially the parts about the underage prostitution ring. I wondered how the ACORN workers could actually have helped with that, what they told the illegal videotapers. I like to be well-informed so I watched the videos, paying special attention to what the ACORN workers said about those topics, how they justified the advice. Do you know what they actually said? NOTHING!! Not one of about a dozen ACORN workers said anything about prostitution rings, adult or juvenile. That's what made me extremely suspicious of all parts of those interviews.

                          Please tell me why my suspicions are not justified.

                          As for the rest of the advice, I question whether any of it actually qualifies as illegal. I'm not convinced that a prostitute might not be able to justify a categorization of performance artist. Some of the other advice might be unorthodox, but it's questionable whether it crosses the line into illegal. That's for others to decide.

                          Your opinion on whether ACORN or any other organization should be used to pass the funds through is pointless. It's simple subcontracting and it's done by the government all the time to achieve greater efficiencies.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 5:12 pm ET)
                            1 6
                            Please tell me why my suspicions are not justified.

                            Your suspicion is completely justified and you're right to question. If it turns out to be a hoax then the full measure of the law should be brought against all involved. However if it's not a hoax, ACORN should be punished as well.

                            Don't forget some people tried to say 9-11 was a "demolition" and that it was perpetrated by our Government.

                            One may not agree with it, but, at this point, but adult prostitution was illegal in the jurisdictions where this activity was alleged to be taking place and certainly the importation of underage girls to that end is a heinous plan.

                            Bottom line is that the Federal Government should not be using levied tax dollars for social engineering.

                            That aside, if ACORN is going to be a conduit for Federal funds, for goodness sake hire folks with ethical integrity who would report to appropriate authorities that these two mopes were trying to conduct a criminal scheme on the tax payer dime.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by ScienceBuff (October 23, 2009 10:45 pm ET)
                              3  
                              If it was a hoax that'll never be revealed. The illegal videotapers are in complete control of the original unedited videos and I'm sure that they'll never be released. They've achieved their goal and ACORN will remain smeared regardless of the honesty of the editing. The illegal videotapers have nothing to gain if what was released was dishonest. If they released the unedited versions and they show honest editing, they stand to gain unassailable credibility. We'll never see them.

                              If a prostitute wants to buy a house, I don't believe that there is any good reason it should be refused. It's hard for me to regard the actions of someone who helps her as criminal. I don't believe the ACORN workers ever heard a single word said about prostitution with underage girls.

                              I believe that effective anti-poverty programs make our country stronger.
                              Report Abuse
                  • Author by congero6189599 (October 23, 2009 2:36 pm ET)
                    5  
                    You probably believe the kids on the e-trade commercials are actually talking too!
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by Chi town (October 24, 2009 12:22 pm ET)
                       
                    wow, there is someone here with some basic common sense.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (October 23, 2009 1:00 pm ET)
                7  
                Liberty-

                Just curious as to how you feel about our tax dollars going to a corporation like, say, Halliburton?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 1:37 pm ET)
                  1 7
                  If you read my posts you'd know how I feel. Having said that, it is a Constitutional duty of the Federal Government to provide for the Defense so if the money is going to Halliburton to that end, with appropriate Congressional oversight, not a problem. I do have a problem with the appearance of impropriety raised by the former Vice President's involvement with Halliburton because it raises ethical questions. Does that satisfy your curiosity?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by ReasonAndResolve (October 24, 2009 10:40 am ET)
                    4  
                    It is also a duty to provide for the general welfare. If the governement uses tax money to contract these services, it is entirely acceptable - andto avoid a bill of attainder, any law passed to restrict a business or organization from receiving federal funds should apply to ALL businesses or organizations.

                    Halliburton and KBR should be denied public funding.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by foghornleghorn (October 24, 2009 1:16 pm ET)
                      3  
                      Halliburton and KBR should be denied public funding.

                      Especially since they are importing real, actual, living and breathing underage sex slaves while ACORN talked about fake, fictional, imaginary underage sex slave rings.

                      Not to mention they are raping women, electrocuting soldiers, smugging in weapons that are killing our soldiers, and providing substandard food and water that are making our soldiers sick.

                      Yes, they should be denied public funding.
                      Report Abuse
              • Author by pilotx (October 23, 2009 3:08 pm ET)
                6  
                You got one thing wrong, the filmmakers weren't federal agents so........
                Also the people I know who were helped by ACORN were given assistance to find JOBS. Despite your subtle association of poor people to birds looking for a handout shows me you are biased in that matter but that's not surprising. Wrong again about ACORN supporting a certain candidate, they registered voters, they didn't go into the voting booth to make sure those registered voted for a particular candidate unless you have evidence they did. Like the others if you do have evidence of this I would love to see it. And no I am very consistant about my ethical stance, I said it before if those ACORN workers did anything illegal they should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Didn't I already say that or do you need to fit me in your extreme box? If a law was broken why were there no charges filed? Simply put they were set up.
                To close, yes there is class warfare and the rich are winning. I just want a fair fight.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 3:34 pm ET)
                  1 7
                  Didn't say they were, just clarified "entrapment"
                  To close, yes there is class warfare and the rich are winning. I just want a fair fight.

                  Well, there you go. Perception is everything. Just remember: when you pick the pocket of the guy ahead of you to get ahead, the guy behind you gets to pick your pocket too.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by congero6189599 (October 23, 2009 3:49 pm ET)
                    5  
                    So the rich are having their pockets picked?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 5:22 pm ET)
                      1 7
                      Well, I don't know, are they?

                      When you take money or property earned through their own industry from one person in order to give it to another with no goods or services being exchanged, what would you call it?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by ReasonAndResolve (October 24, 2009 10:42 am ET)
                        4  
                        Taxation. I call it paying for the service and protection of the federal government that makes your way of life possible.

                        How is that?
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by Craig (October 23, 2009 7:04 pm ET)
                      4  
                      With the productivity of the American worker rising while his wages stagnate, and most of the benefits of the increased productivity going to the wealthiest of the wealthy, I'd say it's the very rich who are the pickpockets.
                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by pilotx (October 23, 2009 5:28 pm ET)
                    6  
                    Don't want to pick anybody's pocket but we don't need a caste system here. I thought in America every has the same chance as everyone else. That has never been the case. For years people of color were kept out of certain schools and professions so that affected lots of people for generations. Now "good schools" are only for the wealthy while our underclass get crappy schools with really no chance at gaining the same advantages that the wealthy have. If this was truly a just and equitable society no one would have tp pick anybody's pocket.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 6:50 pm ET)
                        4
                      @mikeskew
                      Has society been unfair to you because you're black? See in the Marines we were all green. In the Troopers all grey. In business I don't care what color you are. I think people should succeed on merit and hard work. If I have a black employee who is a worker and a white who is a slacker; I'll fire the white guy and promote the black guy and if it's reversed the black guy goes. I can only speak for myself. I now live in a great neighborhood with a black cardiac surgeon. He's way wealthier than me! He spent four years in college, four years in med-school, and eight years between residency and fellowship and now has his own practice. Should I feel cheated? This handsome fellow in the White House, what's his ethnicity again? Nobody keeps you down but you my friend. You can't get results without the effort. Blame the public school system? I went to public school, so did my wife, she's a doctor and I own my own business. The school I went to was 55% black and near the projects, I worked part time and summers from the age of 14. Both of my parents worked just to pay the bills. I admire that surgeon, he worked his butt off and studied hard, why should he be forced to support those who didn't by giving half of his income in taxes. He happens to be a good Christian as well and I know he gives generously to charity but it rubs him wrong as well that his taxes are going to support generations of lazy, irresponsible slugs, black or white. I'm all for helping people but when I see people on social services texting on the latest blackberry, smoking and buying beer and then complaining they can't afford antibiotics for their sick kids. Explain to me how well the system of government social redistribution of wealth works again. Oh and take a look at the party that political power in those poor neighborhoods belongs to and look for how long and explain it to me.
                      Sorry for the rant.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by congero6189599 (October 23, 2009 9:38 pm ET)
                        5  
                        My God man,we all work hard,and my black mother who raised 4 kids in the South Bronx(father died)sometimes with public assistance instilled in all of us a good work ethic. At certain times layed off her job we could not make it without public assistance(Welfare). It wasn't pleasant and the stigma attached to and the hoops she had to jump through to get it wasn't pleasant. We and the others we knew on it needed every commodity we got and every penny we received was spent on surviving. People are poor not because they are lazy and/or sitting on their butts,thats a myth and where you and I will continue to butt heads. For every example you can give of a neglegent parent I can provide 10 where the system has failed and people have slipped through the cracks. You see thats the problem forming opinions based on personal opinions and not facts,it leads you to wrong conclusions.

                        The gap between rich and poor is a wide as the Grand Canyon, and people are working longer hours for less pay and less job security. Unemployment is as high as it's been since the Great Depression yet CEO salaries are 400x's more than their employees. There is redistriburion taking place but it ain't to the bottom ,it's to the top. The top 1% hold more wealth than the combined wealth of the bottom 50% of this nation and the trend is getting worse as unemployment climbs. This inequality is not because people are lazy, and don't get me wrong I'am not whinning just pointing out reality,for every job openning there is a flood of applicants. I will not sit back and let you denigrate hard working poor people with a few examples you may have come across in your life of people gaming the system. You are entitled to your opinions but don't try and pass them off as facts. Your perception of poor people is where we clash as illustrated by your above post . It ain't the poor that has their hands in your pocket or your doctor friend. Oh and by the way my brothers and my sister work hard for everything they have but we never forget where we came from,and despite all the racism we've experienced we don't hate "white" people so save your self-gratifying stories about working at 14 and being robbed and so on for your kids. We've been there done that. I was one of the first to be placed in a bussing program in New York City from P.S.39 to a school in the North Bronx with kids from East Harlem. I remember vivivdly @ 9 yrs. old (3rd grade)the reception we received as we got off the bus in our "new" school clothes only to be spat on and screamed at by angry "white" adults who thought we would ruin their school. Parents that thought we came from homes where our parents drank and smoked their welfare checks away or were irresponsible slugs as you so ineloquently put it. You including "white" along with "black" doesn't lessen the hate of people that word denotes. I know I speak for others when I say that experiences like that as a people only made us stronger. As a people we did not come as far as we have by whinning and crying victim...another myth people like you try to push, we have had to fight every step of the way. My mother taught me this song when I was very young and I've taught it to my children,all three college graduates,and this was the mantra of my community not the exception. It's called The Negro National Anthem(can you tell me why black people might write an anthem?)Hint : It isn't because we play the victim.

                        The Negro National Anthem

                        (Lift Every Voice and Sing)

                        Composed by James Weldon Johnson and J. Rosamond Johnson


                        James Weldon Johnson
                        (1871-1938)

                        Lift Every Voice and sing till earth and heaven ring
                        Ring with the harmonies of liberty
                        Let our rejoicing rise high as the listening skies
                        Let it resound loud as the rolling sea

                        Sing a song, full of the faith that the dark past has taught us
                        Sing a song, full of the hope that the present has brought us
                        Facing the rising sum of our new day begun
                        Let us march on till victory is won

                        Stony the road we trod, bitter the chastening rod
                        felt in the days when hope unborn had died
                        yet with a steady beat, have not our weary feet
                        come to the place for which our fathers sighed?

                        We have come, over a way that which tears has been watered
                        We have come, treading out path through the blood of the slaughtered
                        Out of the gloomy past, till now we stand at last,
                        Where the white gleam of our bright star is cast

                        GOD of our weary years, GOD of our silent tears
                        Thou Who has brought us thus far on the way
                        Thou Who hast by Thy might, led us into the light
                        Keep us for-e-ver in the path we pray

                        Lest our feet, stray from the places our GOD where me met thee
                        Lest our hearts, drunk with the wine of the world we forget Thee
                        Shadowed beneath thy hand, may we forever stand
                        TRUE TO OUR GOD, TRUE TO OUR NATIVE LAND

                        Excuse the rant everyone but I could not let libertycop post and sorry if you don't like my bluntness his trash without a rebuttal. Oh and libertycop you can call me what you like,I've been called worse and can hold my own I've come to far to let "moron" hold me back. I too will try to remain civil but that will not stop me from calling it or telling it like it tis'.

                        Report Abuse
          • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (October 23, 2009 8:13 am ET)
            5 1
            Well that about sums it up...carry on.
            You couldn't sum up two and two without a calculator. I would like to say I have rarely seen such ignorance as yours, but you're just another cookie-cutter GOP troll who can't read for comprehension and believes edited videos as if they told the whole story.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 11:59 am ET)
              2 8
              Tsk, tsk,

              Actually your "cookie-cutter GOP troll" comment proves what a complete moron you really are. In terms of ignorance; if you think you derived what I "believe" or do not from my tongue in cheek parody of the idiotic little left-wing, anti-FNC, squawking parrots here, then it is you who are sublimely ignorant. In terms of reading comprehension, I can point you to any number of your ilk, on this site and others, that even with the text in front of them can't see through their own lefist rage to comprehend even the most simple concept. I see from your tag you fancy yourself something of a debater. So far; not too impressed. - LOL!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (October 23, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
                5  
                You need to look in the mirror, your debating skills suck big time.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 1:53 pm ET)
                  1 7
                  Actually, congero6189599, I'm glad you chimed in! I don't claim to be someone who "refutes wingnuts"; But you happen to be one of the morons, who "even with the text in front of them can't see through their own lefist rage to comprehend even the most simple concept." that I was refering to.(Remember the race thread? Go back and re-read my post, carefully this time and then re-read your post. You're a moron.) and I would be happy to debate that point with you at length, but if your idea of debate is
                  You need to look in the mirror, your debating skills suck big time.
                  I'm not really all that concerned with your opinion of my debating skills and I'm pretty certain of the outcome.
                  Isn't this fun!
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by congero6189599 (October 23, 2009 2:32 pm ET)
                    5  
                    I have read your post libertyflop thats why I responded to you here. Your post was a flop and didn't say anything which is why i asked you the questions I did. You calling me a moron...well lets just say I consider the source. I mean someone going around calling themselves libertycop says enough for me. You see if you actually had debating skills they would be evident in your post and you wouldn't have to resort to calling people morons. What I was suggesting to you with my look in the mirror comment had to do with if people are not understanding you maybe it's because you are not being clear,so maybe you need to look in the mirror and polish up your skills. To see a moron you only need look in the mirror. I enjoy the back and forth but this is too easy.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 4:09 pm ET)
                      1 7
                      libertyflop
                      Wow! Wasn't that witty?
                      I call you a moron because you are.
                      The "look in the mirror" comment reflects your own inability to even get beyond the "You! - No you!" level of debate. "Your debate skills suck big time" is what garnered you the title "moron", moron. Yep I'm calling you names, it seems common practice around here so I just figure I'll join in, especially with you, congero6189599.
                      No, you didn't understand my post because you are too stupid to get beyond your little preconceived notions rather than actually reading what I had written, moron.
                      I mean someone going around calling themselves libertycop says enough for me.
                      Really? Articulate that point, moron. Weren't you lecturing me on racism, bigotry and preconceptions? You have something against liberty? Or cops?
                      You probably believe the kids on the e-trade commercials are actually talking too!
                      How clever! You're calling someone stupid, right? Moron.
                      You need to look in the mirror, your debating skills suck big time.
                      You are a moron end of story.
                      Now that was easy!
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 4:44 pm ET)
                        4 2
                        That series of previous posts were totally uncalled for and I sincerely apologise to congero6189599 for calling him a moron.

                        I will attempt to maintain a civil tone and not rely on sarcasm or insults to make a point or disagree.
                        Report Abuse
          • Author by Ruby (October 23, 2009 8:23 am ET)
            6  
            Try and keep up.

            In this video, there is no indication that the woman on tape did anything improper. There is no evidence that she entertained the outlandish story put forth by the "pimp and prostitute". She called the cops on them.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by loogie (October 22, 2009 10:38 pm ET)
        1 6
        oh geez, corruption is corruption. Poor lady is screwing with your tax money.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by oldmaninblackforest (October 23, 2009 1:13 pm ET)
          5
        It's called the First Amendment, OBVIOUSLY something you are not familiar with.... ROFLOL... ROFLOL.... Happens EVERY DAY on the MSM, you asleep or just asleep? It's immoral to help a prostitute... ROFLOL... ROFLOL...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Craig (October 23, 2009 2:30 pm ET)
          5  
          It's immoral to help a prostitute...


          Why do you hate Jesus?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (October 23, 2009 3:31 pm ET)
          4  
          The first amendment protects individual citizens from the Federal Government restricting free speech, you dum-dum. It's not relevant in this discussion.

          There was no prostitute being helped. There was no prostitute, remember, nor was there any child smuggling.

          People who have no idea what they're talking about shouldn't try to educate those of us who DO know what they're talking about.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by VeeKay (October 22, 2009 9:15 pm ET)
      2 10
      Oh Cmon, who do you watch then? CNN the Clinton News Network? Although they aren't half as bad as MSNBC.

      Its obvious that ACORN just wants to dupe the American Taxpayer out of their money.

      Add on the false voter registration and most people can see who ACORN is in bed with.

      You folks sound like 3rd graders:

      "Liar"
      "Same to you but more of it"
      "Liar"
      "I'm gonna tell!"

      Jeeesh!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ScienceBuff (October 23, 2009 9:26 am ET)
        7 1
        CNN is the most balanced of the cable news networks. They tilt somewhat to the right, but not a lot.

        Taxpayer money is an extremely small part of ACORN's funding. Most of the taxpayer funding they get is pretty much flow-through money, going to the needy. ACORN simply acts as a conduit. It's ignorant to suggest that they are handed tax money that goes into their coffers to do with as they please.

        Please tell me, how does ACORN benefit from fraudulent voter registrations. They are a victim of that, not a beneficiary.

        You're quick to accuse the posters here of third grade tactics. It's nonsense in most instances. A lot of very substantive discussion takes place on these boards. However, that suggests that you favor more adult conversation. Would you like to respond to the facts I listed above?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ScienceBuff (October 23, 2009 10:57 am ET)
        1  
        You left out the comma after "MATTERS." Put that in and I'll agree, you are and should.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by ScienceBuff (October 23, 2009 2:18 pm ET)
          1  
          This was in reply to a post that has now been (very rightfully) pulled. I would have expected to see the entire thread behind it gone as well.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Kid Funkadelic (October 23, 2009 12:42 am ET)
      6 3
      Media Matters needs to do a report on the real pimp that FOX promotes Dennis Hof , owner of the Bunny Ranch in Nevada. FOX has had him on for several shows. He pimps hundreds of women. You have to ask yourself why FOX viewers are so outraged about imaginary prostitution but not the real thing.Why don't James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles do a report on that ?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (October 23, 2009 11:24 am ET)
        3 1
        The Bunny Ranch is a legal establishment, isn't it? It may be distasteful but these places are legal in NV. Now I agree it's hypocritical if Fox is promoting this guy considering how Beck and Hannity are always talking about 'family values' but I'm not sure it's the best comparison with this ACORN story. What I waould like to hear is more from the people O'Keefe and Giles supposedly exposed. Did they really believe their story. We know at least one person didn't and from the video I've seen of O'Keefe dressed up like Kid Rock it's hard for me to imagine anyone believed them.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Boxer1979 (October 23, 2009 4:51 pm ET)
          2  
          Hey Hannity was there. Is that what Fox Snooze would mention? Hmm?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by pilotx (October 23, 2009 2:27 am ET)
      10  
      And by the way Liberty since the comments are closed on the other topic I have to respond to you here. What you call racist behavior exhibited by Black people is not seen as such by us. Though I don't use the "n" word myself when others in our community use it it is not in the same context as those outside of our community. It is commonly used as a term of endearment, I don't agree with this but it is what it is. While you may not agree with this or even understand it you cannot paint a kid using it as slang as someone who uses it as a racist slur. Also, Warren did not call Juan a porch monkey, if he had that would have been totally unacceptable but he did insinuate that he did not have the best interests of his own people at heart and to us that is a very serious charge. Just as there is ethnic pride anong Italians there is the same pride among Black people. Most of this can be cleared up if there is more understanding between all people in this country but it is people like Rush who make this impossible by keeping us divided.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 3:10 pm ET)
        1 8
        @Mikeskew: I noticed that as well. Just to be clear. I am an American. Period. I provided you with background history and a couple specific incidents in order to illustrate that it can be a conscious choice to not allow history and experience with individuals to turns us into racists or bigots.
        Guys like Limbaugh and Sharpton can only keep people who choose to be divided, divided.
        I am fully aware of exactly what Warren said to Juan and to be clear I did not use the term porch monkey (bad enough these guys already think I'm Republican).
        In my opinion degradation and the use of racial slurs among the black community, regardless of intent, does nothing to change negative perceptions and only serves to strengthen them. Also, if some chooses racial prejudice above common sense, there isn't much you can do. Just observe what goes on here. Anyone who disagrees with a point made by the little left leaning gang in here is labeled a Republican (shudder), Teabagging, neo-con, racist, right-wing, etc.. and if that doesn't work you get "well you suck!" I don't worry about it, and in fact I find it pretty amusing because I can take as well as give. - Peace
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 23, 2009 3:18 pm ET)
          6  
          Oh, come on already - you are awfully sensitive for a cop. I am certainly not a Democrat. I was a Republican until the Clinton witch hunts, now I am neither. But, when I come on here and argue with the right-wingers all I ever get back is that I am a socialist, liberal, commie, blah, blah, blah. So what? Who cares? They don't even know me personally. Why you would continuously bring it up as if it hurts your feelings I have no idea.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
            1 4
            I bring it up to illustrate the pervasive tone of this site. I agree that both side of the spectrum engage in that label flinging and you're right, who cares? I just find it interesting from a perspective stand point.

            LOL! - Actually as a cop found being sensitive was a good thing, I treated people like I would expect to treated in the same situation.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (October 23, 2009 3:46 pm ET)
          5  
          You have no clue to lump Sharpton and Limbaugh together as opposites of the same pole prove it. I've never called you any of the names you mentioned, I could care less what your political affiliation is. I've found a few professed conservative posters here to be quite enlightening and informative and I enjoy and look for their comments. It's posters like you that act like they have some special knowledge that everyone should accept without any facts or links to back up their assertions. We become morons when we don't accept your "special" truth,and when you get back what you give,you then run and whine about being attacked. Well too bad. We can take as well as give also,but I'am increasingly finding in my battle of wits with you is that I'am dealing with an unarmed man.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 4:40 pm ET)
            1 6
            Actually I'm pretty well armed.

            Ohhhhhh, you meant metaphorically as in "the battle of wits". Now see; that was clever! Not original, but clever.

            I apologize for the moron comments. It was uncalled for and juvenile for me to engage in. It just feels good sometimes to air it out a little though, doesn't it?

            With regard to Sharpton, I lived and worked and had first hand contact in the area of the Tawana Brawley case, so please don't lecture me on the good Reverend Al and his tendencies.

            I presented plenty of facts to support my opinions and generally base them on first hand experience. Sometimes though opinions are simply that; opinions and are neither right nor wrong just different.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by peace4all (October 23, 2009 4:54 pm ET)
          4  
          I don't worry about it, and in fact I find it pretty amusing because I can take as well as give. - Peace

          really? so when are you going to start giving. so far you have given nothing that my 10 y.o. couldn't
          Report Abuse
          • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 5:28 pm ET)
              3
            really? so when are you going to start giving. so far you have given nothing that my 10 y.o. couldn't

            Hahahahahaha! That was awsome peace4all!

            Report Abuse
        • Author by pilotx (October 23, 2009 5:53 pm ET)
          5  
          Ya know I hear that "I'm an American" stuff all the time especially from the Limbaugh types but they never live up to it. If you really flet that way I would never hear "Black, Latino, white, ect" only American. Take for example your story about being assaulted it would have been "I was mugged by two Americans" not two Blacks. Same with Limbaugh, if he really wanted us to all be 'mericans he wouldn't have erroneously brought up the fact that Sen. Sharrod Brown was "obviously an African American". Actually we should all embrace our ethnicities not downplay them because they are a part of who we are. I love learning about other cultures. In Chicago we have many ethnic neighborhoods and it's great eating new food, talking to different people and learning about their homelands. I love the fact that there are so many different languages spoken here. We should strive to learn more about differing cultures and speak as many languages as we can not look down on bilingual people. Only in America is it frowned upon to be multilingual. Insanity.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 7:27 pm ET)
              2
            @mikeskew, honestly I don't know what's in Limbaugh's heart, I can even stand the guy's show for more than 5 minutes. I do view us all as American, and I wish more people would. The American black muggers though, I mean it was to illustrate a point and I honestly think you understand that. I mean if they were white I would describe them as two white males...etc. Race, unfortunately was germane to the point.

            As a friend of mine says: What do call someone who speaks only one language? American.
            I actually speak four German, Spanish, Italian and English...but I'm still an American. Damn it.

            Peace
            Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 23, 2009 3:14 pm ET)
        5  
        You are wasting your time, mike. If libertycop truly believes that black youths are being racists towards one another when they use n-i-g-g-a he just doesn't get it and never will. Sometimes, when people live a sheltered existence, they never understand certain truths that those of us who live in reality take for granted.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pilotx (October 23, 2009 5:41 pm ET)
          5  
          I have to agree with you that Libertycop seems to have little knowledge of my community. Most of us don't consider Sharpton in the same light as Limbaugh, in fact many of us, myself included, respect the man and listen to his radio program. I got the picture he was trying to paint when he says Rush isn't a racist but Warren Ballentine is despite Rush's long history of racist comments and Warren's one. Also telling is how the term "hard working" is the new conservative code word as if we all don't work hard. Let's be real his story about getting mugged by two Black youth and not becoming a racist and blaming all of us, why that's mighty.....noble of him. Point is trying to make false equivalents is nothing new for conservatives. They've been trying for years to paint people of color as the REAL racists while white bigots are just joking and politically incorrect. After 8 years of conservatives telling me up is really down I'm not too surprised. The biggest point is Black and whites mostly see racism differently. Nine out of ten Black people will say Rush is a racist while Warren isn't and vice versa. We found this out for real in 1995 after the OJ verdict, we live in different worlds. Thing is I know all about their world but most of them know nothing about mine but have opinions about how we should think.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by libertycop (October 23, 2009 5:57 pm ET)
          1 7
          @mikehuck
          I'm not going to attack you here but let's clarify your assertion. Here's what I actually wrote:
          In my opinion degradation and the use of racial slurs among the black community, regardless of intent, does nothing to change negative perceptions and only serves to strengthen them.
          Here's what what you distilled from that:
          If libertycop truly believes that black youths are being racists towards one another when they use n-i-g-g-a he just doesn't get it and never will.
          Really? That's what you got? Wow.

          You said:
          Sometimes, when people live a sheltered existence, they never understand certain truths that those of us who live in reality take for granted.

          What truth are you referring to? Care to offer something substantial? Are you saying I lived a sheltered existence? Would you like to meet and go through my employment records and residential history? Would it be fair for me to make the assumption that for you the truth doesn't matter and you're just interested in telling everyone that I'm some sort of "nut" because I don't view the world though your eyes?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pilotx (October 23, 2009 6:13 pm ET)
            4  
            Libertycop, you sound like a decent guy and I gave you a thumbs up for your post about being civil and such but methinks we can learn a bit for you and your experiences and vice versa. You come across as an openminded individual but let me just say please don't dismiss some of our more enlightened posters such as Snoopy, Mikehuck, Ms. Perlene Scott and others outright. I know you won't but in my experience it helps to listen to people of other ethnicites and cultures and think about things from their eyes and experiences. Thanks for playing and trust, we prefer sarcasm and humor. See ya around brother.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by themidnightreview.com (October 23, 2009 10:05 am ET)
      6  
      Wallace reported: "O'Keefe wants to set the record straight. ... And he says he'll release all the tapes soon to show if any ACORN offices did the right thing." Wallace then added, "Why not release all the tapes at the start?" and proceeded to air video of O'Keefe saying, "We knew that they would lie and they would say, 'Oh, you've got nothing,' or 'You're dubbing your voice in.' But you release a little bit at a time, and they get caught in their lie.
      O'Keefe loves Alinsky's rules for radicals, and it seems he is abiding by these few:

      8. Keep the pressure on with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.
      9. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
      10. The major premise of tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
      11. If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside.


      One mistake I think O'Keefe is making is he is ignoring rule number 7:

      7. A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.


      When the videos first appeared, they whipped up everybody into a frenzy, even spurring congress to strip funding for ACORN, but now, as O'Keefe trickles out his edited films, it only riles up Fox News. Knowing that O'Keefe follows these rules, and combining the comments that he made in The New Guard Magazine about being your own media, you can see his true agenda.

      ----------------------------
      The Midnight Review
      Mum Is The Word


      Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (October 23, 2009 4:46 pm ET)
      3  
      Alan Grayson stomped all over a Republican for trying to pass a Bill of Attainder about ACORN. Which is un-constitutional. What Fox Snooze is doing is beating a dead horse. All lies and smears. Since 2003 Fox Snooze has went to town with smears thanks to the Florida Appeal Judge.

      [http://wintersoldier1.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/hypocrites.gif]
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RareButSerious (October 23, 2009 6:37 pm ET)
        1
      The real significance of the Philly video is that it disproves that office's claim, repeated by MediaMatters, that the Hannah & Giles were "shown the door."

      Breitbart stands by his claim that the pair were kicked out of no ACORN offices anywhere. So far, no evidence to the contrary has emerged.

      Will MediaMatters guard its credibility and issue a correction of its story containing the false claim that the pair were kicked out of ACORN's Philly office?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (October 25, 2009 5:28 pm ET)
      2  
      Pushing this story to the forefront HELPS Democrats greatly. First, it illustrates GOP pettiness. Second, it facilitates a discussion about the REAL criminal organizations receiving government dollars (Halliburton and Black Water). Finally, it distracts the GOP from reinventing itself into a viable party.

      So I say, KEEP BEATING ON ACORN! My popcorn bowl overfloweth.

      Randy
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.