About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox News on a witch hunt for Obama "czars"

September 09, 2009 8:46 pm ET — 47 Comments

On September 8, Fox News host Megyn Kelly stated that "more of President Obama's special advisers are now under scrutiny after the resignation of his green jobs czar," Van Jones and described "criticisms" being lodged against Obama science and technology adviser John Holdren and Obama nominee Cass Sunstein. In fact, Fox News personalities have been leading the charge against Jones, Holdren, Sunstein, and other Obama administration officials and nominees they have described as "czars" -- often by unearthing and criticizing statements the officials had made in the past rather than critiquing their job performance or credentials for those positions -- with Sean Hannity, for example, declaring that "my job starting tomorrow night is to get rid of every other ['czar']."

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Kelly: Obama "advisers are now under scrutiny" following Van Jones resignation

From the September 8 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom:

KELLY: Well, more of Obama's special advisers are now under scrutiny following the resignation of his green jobs czar.

[...]

KELLY: And now ,questions are being asked about his so-called science czar, John Holdren. Now, he is under fire for a textbook discussing population control policies like forced sterilization and mandatory abortion.

Beck led the charge against Van Jones

Beck falsely accused Van Jones of being a "convicted felon ... who spent, I think, six months in prison after the Rodney King beating." As Eva Paterson, president and founder of the Equal Justice Society, has explained, "Van [Jones] has never served time in any prison. He has never been convicted of any crime." On August 11, Beck said (transcript from the Nexis database):

BECK: We've spent some time over here. There is so much more to cover, but I want to talk to you about the green movement root. I couldn't figure out why the green movement -- here is Van Jones. This is a convicted felon, a guy who spent, I think, six months in prison after the Rodney King beating.

He was a black nationalist. He came out an anarchist and a communist. He then found the green movement was the new red. And now, he's our green jobs czar. Why is there so much money from the green movement, fund for public interest?

Beck: "Do we want communists in the United States government as special advisers to the president?" On the September 1 edition of his Fox News program, Beck aired a clip of Jones stating, "This movement is deeper than a solar panel, deeper than a solar panel. Don't stop there. Don't stop there. No, we're going to change the whole system. We're going to change the whole thing." Beck then commented in part: "When will you wake up? I know there are good, decent people -- left and right, Democrats and Republicans -- that watch this program. How much more evidence do you need that we have radicals in the White House? Oh, we haven't even begun. If you think you need more, we need to -- at least in this country -- start having the necessary discussion of: Do we want communists in the United States government as special advisers to the president?"

Beck warns companies away from Jones: "[Y]ou better wake the hell up soon, because you're in bed with communists." On the September 2 edition of his radio show, discussing Jones' interactions with business leaders, Beck stated: "I know greed plays a big role in today's companies, but companies, you better wake the hell up soon, because you're in bed with communists, and that never really works out well for the whole 'I'm a capitalist company' kind of thing."

Beck said that Jones' place in the Obama administration "says that the president has an agenda that is radical, revolutionary, and in some cases, Marxist." From the September 3 edition of Glenn Beck (transcript from the Nexis database):

BECK: During the campaign, the president said, "If you want to know what my policies are, you have to look to the people I surround myself with." So, I did.

Van Jones. Van Jones -- he is our green jobs czar. He said the same thing, except he said, quote, "Personnel is policy." Well, what does that tell you? Well, in the case of Van Jones, and several others in this administration, it says that the president has an agenda that is radical, revolutionary, and in some cases, Marxist.

We have laid this case out before you and for several weeks, and we didn't just tell you these things, we showed you the video in their own words. But, for the last 24 hours, everybody in the media has been talking about Van Jones and what he said about the Republicans. Apparently, what has captured the attention of so many people since we played this video yesterday is the fact that Van Jones called the Republicans a naughty name in February of this year. Well, Van Jones has apologized. He's sorry. He said the "A" word about Republicans.

He's not sorry, however -- let me show you. He's sorry about calling the Republicans this, but he's not sorry at all about these things -- that he's a self-avowed communist. Not sorry about that. That he says that we need a whole new system -- no apology. No apology for his freeing -- what was that guy's name, Mumia Abu-Jamal, the communist cop killer in Philadelphia.

Beck attacks on Jones follow ad boycott of Beck's show led by group Jones founded. Many of Beck's attacks on Jones occurred after ColorofChange.org -- a group co-founded by Jones -- initiated a campaign calling on Beck's Fox News advertisers to stop sponsoring his show. The campaign came in response to Beck's claim that Obama is a "racist" who "has a deep-seeded hatred for white people." According to the group, 62 companies have stated that they will no longer advertise on Beck's show.

After Jones resignation, Fox personalities list other targets

Glenn Beck urged followers to "Find everything you can on Cass Sunstein, Mark Lloyd, and Carol Browner." From Beck's Twitter feed:

beck

Fox Business' Eric Bolling: "Van Jones resigns ... How about J Holdren Science Czar (mass sterilization) and Cass Susstein [sic]." From Bolling's Twitter feed:

bolling

Sean Hannity: "We got rid of one [czar], and my job, starting tomorrow night is to get rid of every other one. I promise you that." As the Think Progress blog noted, at a September 7 rally in West Virginia, Hannity said:

HANNITY: Do you want another czar?

CROWD: No!

HANNITY: I don't think so. By the way, we got one -- we got rid of one, and my job starting tomorrow night is to get rid of every other one. I promise you that.

Fox personalities repeatedly attacked "czars," Obama administration officials

Hannity falsely claims Holdren "advocated compulsory abortion" On the September 8 edition of his Fox News show, Sean Hannity forwarded the false conservative talking point -- which PolitiFact.com gave "Pants on Fire" status -- that White House science and technology adviser John Holdren "advocated compulsory abortion" and "spoke out in defense of compulsory abortion and sterilization." In fact, Holdren never "advocated" for any kind of involuntary birth control; he co-authored an environmental sciences book more than 30 years ago that discusses "compulsory control of family size" including abortion and sterilization as a possible consequence for countries whose expanding birth rates are not curbed by "milder methods."

Beck: "Cass Sunstein and John Holdren and Mark Lloyd and the list goes on and on" are "radical[s]."

BECK: This guy is still a radical -- just like Cass Sunstein and John Holdren and Carol Browner and Mark Lloyd and the list goes on and on and on.

Now, some in the White House may be uncomfortable calling these individuals radicals or revolutionaries or communists, but I'm not. I'm not. The best thing I can do is ask you, America, are you comfortable with their viewpoints? [Fox News' Glenn Beck, 8/31/09]

After mentioning Wright and Ayers, Beck suggests Holdren supports "forced abortions," attacks Sunstein for "want[ing] animals to be able to sue you in court."

BECK: In 20 years at Jeremiah Wright's church, Obama only ever heard the pastor talk about rain-colored -- you know, rainbow-colored unicorns. William Ayers, co-founder of the domestic terror group the Weather Underground -- Obama says, "I was really young when all that happened. I didn't know that he was blowing stuff up."

For the love of Pete! He said a friend introduced them. You're going over to a guy who was a terrorist, who blew up the Pentagon. Do you not tell your friend that you're going to introduce him to -- do you not say, "By the way, don't say anything about blowing up buildings. He kind of did some stuff."

You didn't know that? You didn't know about Rashid Khalidi's compassionate feelings for terrorists. Now, communist Van Jones - didn't know? I don't know. Science czar John Holdren. Is the president for the forced abortions and putting sterilants in the drinking water? How about regulatory czar Cass Sunstein? He wants animals to be able to sue you in court. [Fox News' Glenn Beck, 9/3/09]

Hannity and Malkin attack Ron Bloom, can't decide if he's "manufacturing czar" or "green jobs czar." Beck stated to Fox News contributor Michelle Malkin on September 8, "Michelle, I want to talk to you a little about, first of all, the new guy that was appointed yesterday. What is his name? He's the new green jobs czar." Malkin responded "Ron Bloom." Malkin later called Bloom "a union hatchet man" who decided to "insinuate himself in the business world, understand how their antagonists and enemies work, and then go back into the labor union and use what he knew to shake down and to make them bend to their will." Later that same evening, in a "Land of the Czars" segment, Hannity asserted "Meet Ron Bloom. He is the man President Obama has tapped to be his manufacturing czar." Moments later, Hannity stated: "Now we're going to continue to highlight the revolving door of radicals and lobbyists joining this administration in the days ahead."

On Fox Business Channel, Willard asks if Ron Bloom is "another extreme socialist in our midst." Teasing an upcoming segment on the September 8 edition of Fox Business' Happy Hour, Cody Willard stated: "As one czar leaves another comes in. But will a secret from Ron Bloom's past mean there's yet another extreme socialist in our midst?" During the following segment, Bolling quoted a report that "much of Bloom's early life revolved around Habonim, now known as Habonim Dror, a progressive Labor Zionist youth movement that emphasizes cultural Judaism, socialism and social justice."

Beck calls Carol Browner a "socialist"; Malkin asserts "I have been warning about energy czar Carol Browner since December." During her appearance on Beck on September 8, Malkin also attacked Obama administration official Carol Browner, stating "I have been warning about energy czar Carol Browner since December. I followed her career, her subversion of transparency." On the August 25 edition of his show, Beck called Browner a "socialist" who "ha[s] the ear of the president of the United States" based on Browner's involvement with Socialists International, an international federation of progressive parties that includes the British and Israeli Labor parties as constituent members.

Hannity: "Health reform czar" Nancy-Ann DeParle is a member of "Obama's shadow government" who worked for companies that "were targeted in serious federal investigations." From the July 16 edition of Hannity:

HANNITY: Now it's time once again to take a closer look at one of the many figures in President Obama's shadow government. Let's go now to the "Land of Czars."

All right. Meet Nancy-Ann DeParle, the unconfirmed health reform czar of the Obama administration. Now, this former Clinton aide has been widely criticized for her close ties to corporations in the health care industry. And according to American University, many of the companies that she at one time worked for were targeted in serious federal investigations and accused of kickback schemes and other ethical violations.

Doocy: Obama administration aide Mark Lloyd "has stated that the United States should model its media after Venezuela." On September 8, Fox & Friends co-host Steve Doocy stated: "[H]ere in this country, Mark Lloyd, who is a controversial chief of diversity -- the officer at the FCC. He has stated that the United States should model its media after Venezuela."

Kelly: Betsy McCaughey has outlined how Ezekiel Emanuel "has got some rather -- some might call them radical proposals for revision to our health care system." On the August 10 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom, Kelly asserted of McCaughey: "[S]he outlines how Rahm Emanuel's brother Ezekiel Emanuel has got some rather -- some might call them radical proposals for revision to our health care system." As Media Matters documented, McCaughey actually distorted various passages of Emanuel's writings and interviews by cropping and misrepresenting his remarks -- some of which The New York Times had described in context only days earlier -- to smear him as "Obama's Health Rationer-in-Chief."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Bad News (September 09, 2009 8:58 pm ET)
      1  
      Shephard Smith, A lot of us still think of you quite Highly.
      You don't belong at Fox News with Scum like Hannity & O'Reilly.
      In most Circles your Credibility is still pretty Strong.
      It must be hard to look in the mirror making all that money knowing you are in the Wrong.

      Speak truth to power.


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
    • Author by antihannity2009 (September 09, 2009 10:00 pm ET)
      1  
      My job tomorrow night is to get rid of every Hannity.....
      Report Abuse
      • Author by gmohandasa (September 09, 2009 10:42 pm ET)
        1  
        You should be going after Rupert Murdoch. He's the master of the FOX nuthouse.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mightymo (September 09, 2009 10:04 pm ET)
      1 1
      Somehow, Fox Body itself, with it's multi-headed Scorched Earth Mouths, needs to be taken down.

      How Dare this Foreigner named Murdock, with absolutely no Patriotic/National ties to the US, come here and sic his hounds on our people and our national discourse!

      We, citizens of the US, are being attacked by a Foreigner...Murdock! You'd think these "Patriotic" mobs would get a clue!

      I'm SO PO'D!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Tbone Slickens (September 09, 2009 10:10 pm ET)
          8
        Ha-Ha! Now interchange Soros with Murdock...

        Do you feel the same?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (September 09, 2009 10:30 pm ET)
          5  
          Does Soros turn the news into a mega conglomerate that advocates overthrowing a democratically elected president because he wants to destroy the constitution in favor of unbridaled capitalistic greed? Of course he doesn't, so no, it's not even close to same...

          But you knew that already, didn't you?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by kma (September 09, 2009 11:08 pm ET)
              5
            Of course Soros doesn't want the president overthrown. He paid for the office and now he wants to keep it. Soros controls quietly, from the background. Do you think Soros is not a capitalist? Do you think "unbridled(spelled correctly) capitalistic greed" doesn't exist in this administration? Do you think the government can run a business? They haven't succeeded in running any they have tried, yet.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (September 10, 2009 8:09 am ET)
              3  
              Ah, the old carrot about the government not being able to "run" anything, which is wrong as the day is long.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (September 10, 2009 2:45 pm ET)
              2  
              They haven't succeeded in running any they have tried, yet.


              And another strawman is erected.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by TheDieHard (September 10, 2009 4:07 pm ET)
              1  
              You're confusing "the government" with Ronnie Ray-gun, Traitor Herbert, Chicken George, and that crowd. Senile Ronnie was behind the ghu-awful idea of a "missile defense system," Traitor Herbert was only intrested in running his black-ops CIA, and Chicken brought his unmitigated record of failing at everything he ever tried to teh White House, which he proceded to also screw up everything he touched.

              Under Democratic presidents, the government has run business projects quite well, from the railroads and highway system to the Centers for Disease Control and the expansion of DARPA into the internet.

              It was also under the chickenhawks that private businesses failed so spectacularly, except for war profiteers, of course -- but those weren't being run as a business, they were being run as wholly-taxpayer-subsidized arms of the Greedy Oil Party.

              Of course, the very definition of a bushvoter is "moron, hypocrite, liar, paranoid schizophrenic (incapable of facing reality), and too stupid to be allowed to HAVE an opinion."
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Missouri Democrat (September 10, 2009 5:45 pm ET)
              1  
              I take it that Medicare, Medicaid and the VA system of healthcare are just total failures? You forget that we have several outstanding and well run government run healthcare systems.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by carlileb5935 (September 11, 2009 1:03 am ET)
                1
              Do you think Soros is not a capitalist?

              yeah, he is, so why would he be backing a socialistic Marxist destroyer like Obama?

              GOP disconnect, rattling in the brain....

              Report Abuse
          • Author by obamaisasocialist (September 10, 2009 12:47 pm ET)
              3
            That would be GE
            Report Abuse
        • Author by mightymo (September 09, 2009 10:33 pm ET)
          1  
          LOL...You and yours go get Soros and We'll go get Murdock!
          Sounds like Bipartisan to ME!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mightymo (September 09, 2009 10:39 pm ET)
          1  
          OOPs..thats right, possibly you all don't believe in bipartisanship. So, do what you want, we will be right here...
          Report Abuse
        • Author by captfoster2 (September 10, 2009 12:02 am ET)
          5  
          Ha-Ha! Now interchange Soros with Murdock...

          Do you feel the same?


          Um....no... why do you ask I wonder aloud?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by joeman (September 10, 2009 4:25 pm ET)
          2
        Oh, your talking about G. Sorros, or Barrak?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by schparky (September 09, 2009 10:05 pm ET)
      1  
      Given that Hannity has appointed himself to the post of Czar-Getting-Rid-of-Guy, anyone here care to take the job of Getting-Sean-Hannity-Fired-Guy/Gal?

      I seem to recall seeing Karl Rove on Fox News a couple of weeks ago complaining about the "czars" influencing policy without actually having been elected. (Meanwhile, the news ticker at the bottom of the screen read "POT CHARACTERIZES KETTLE AS 'BLACK'")
      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (September 09, 2009 10:05 pm ET)
      1  
      Oh, you, silly racist wing nuts,
      silly racist wing nuts
      We love you.
      And, you
      silly racist wing nuts
      silly racist wing nuts
      What you'll do.
      In, space, reichwing master race what a happy time we'll spend.
      wing nuts silly racist wing nuts
      Our fine fourth reichish friend.
      wing nuts silly racist wing nuts
      Our fine fourth reichish friend!
      [http://rackjite.com/graphics/beck.gif]
      Report Abuse
      • Author by schparky (September 09, 2009 10:23 pm ET)
        1  
        Seeing the photo you included in your post gave me an idea. Perhaps we can get Becky to behave if we hold his Flowbee hostage until he promises either to 1) be civil or 2) get professional help.

        Incidentally, does anyone here know if Flowbee is among Beck's remaining advertisers? I wouldn't be a bit surprised.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by indepedent (September 09, 2009 11:00 pm ET)
          2
        Everyone on this site is about one upping the other guy that you make no sense. Both political parties are screwed up and quite honestly after reading the quotes above and in other articles about Van Jones I can't believe he has such ardent supporter please help me understand? The other "Czars" don't worry me so much.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (September 10, 2009 8:10 am ET)
          2  
          What about Van Jones do you find objectionable? That he's a capitalist? That he wants to promote green jobs? That he's a *GASP* environmentalist?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by joeman (September 10, 2009 4:34 pm ET)
               
            He racist
            Report Abuse
          • Author by indepedent (September 10, 2009 8:07 pm ET)
              1
            He gave the Communist comment in 2005 even if he said "was". The white kid Columbine thing is a bit extreme. The Washington Post said "His involvement with the now-defunct Bay Area radical group Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement (STORM), which had Marxist roots, also emerged as an issue. And on Saturday, his advocacy on behalf of death-row inmate Mumia Abu-Jamal, who was convicted of fatally shooting a Philadelphia police officer in 1981, threatened to further deepen the controversy. I think these things most people find odd. Marxist, Communist and defending a cop killer. I want to stop pollution as much as the next guy but this I hope is not the best advocate we can find. He might even hurt the movement.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by obamaisasocialist (September 10, 2009 12:57 pm ET)
          3
        Simple solution. Have these folks confirmed by congress. You have the votes to make them legitimate advisors and with an FBI background check you won't have egg on your face if another of these Czars end up being a racist or marxist or 911 fruitcakeor inexperienced. I don't read any explanations on why it is a good idea for Obama or Bush or any president to have advisors guiding them that have so much negative baggage that they have to sneak them into the whitehouse through the back door.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (September 10, 2009 4:54 pm ET)
          1  
          I just love how after ignoring it for years (because it was a republican doing it) that all of a sudden it's some constitutional crisis that has to be resolved immediately even if it means completely shutting down the government and derailing the current administration. Yeah, no political motive there...
          Report Abuse
    • Author by vwcat (September 09, 2009 10:12 pm ET)
      4  
      Poor Beck. He missed Cass Sustein. He was confirmed by the senate this afternoon.
      hehehehehehe
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (September 10, 2009 8:11 am ET)
        2  
        Which of course blows away his whole "czar" theory about Sunstein. Who, by the way, enjoys support from both sides of the aisle.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by fawltylogic (September 09, 2009 11:03 pm ET)
      4  
      You gotta love that Fox News has perfected the art of the "some say..." reporting. First they have a bunch of their hosts claim "Obama has too many czars!!" Then the next day, they have those same hosts say "Obama is criticized by some for having appointed too many czars!"

      Brilliant.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by blakester (September 10, 2009 12:37 am ET)
        2  
        Sadly, on the Today Show, Meredith Viera used 'some say' (not verbatim) to note the [some say] growing concern about the czars. Ugh. Manufactured concern, Ms. Viera!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (September 09, 2009 11:13 pm ET)
      3  
      "my job starting tomorrow night is to get rid of every other ['czar']."

      Hey, Sean...I guess you've given up trying to take out Obama. So now you're aiming lower, huh? It's nice to see you admit defeat.

      P.S. Sean, Obama is out of your league, man...you're a lightweight.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by TJ_rex (September 09, 2009 11:42 pm ET)
      3  
      Ah yes, Fox News making a mockery of free speech and continuing to be an embarrassment to intelligent hard working Americans.
      But in the eyes of the zombies who watch these shows, the contradictions, lies and mostly fact free babbling is just the best source of current events. Scary!
      If you've tried to 'discuss' anything with these unfortunate folks you know what I mean.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RightStuff (September 10, 2009 8:55 am ET)
        4
      The Fox shows admit to being slanted to the right. Why don't all the leftist sycophantic shows admit their biases? Hate to sound naive, but it only seems fair.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (September 10, 2009 9:53 am ET)
        3  
        No, the Fox show DOES NOT admit to being conservative, as a matter of fact, last time I knew, FoxNews' motto was "Fair and Balanced".

        What leftist sycophantic shows are you talking about? I know, Maddow and Olberman (the only 2 that we have that are liberal). But, then again, those 2 shows aren't even the same level of discourse and highly charged rhetoric that shows on Fox are, and aside from that, I believe Maddow's show is a great show. She's fair, and she's honest, and she engages people from the other side in a respectful manner, and debates their points with them.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by RightStuff (September 10, 2009 10:05 am ET)
            2
          I think the Fox news presentations claim to be fair and balanced. Glen Beck is obviously a program that attacks the left. So is Hannity. They are not "news" programs, but rather commentary on current events. The MSM purports to be reporting unbiased news, but indeed it slants its presentations to the left. I don't watch it any more for that reason. Leftists are all twisted up, and can't follow rational arguments. That is why they mix Hannity and Beck into their discussion of "news" programs. Leftists don't want a fair discussion of current events. They want a shutdown of opposing views, hence the demonizing and marginalizing of Hannity, Beck, Limbaugh, Savage, Levin. The left can't withstand logical argumentation.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by RightStuff (September 10, 2009 10:30 am ET)
            3
          Well, is the Chris Matthews show a political commentary show, or a "news" show? Maddow and Olberman are caricatures of leftists carrying the water for those who would slowly destroy our liberty. Matthews is not far behind.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by SMTDL (September 10, 2009 11:42 am ET)
        2  
        When did Maddow,Matthews,or even Schultz call anybody a communist,facist,or Nazi!???
        They are critical of right wing interpretations but its usually with facts and reasonable,more balanced explanations.Have Beck/Hannity ever done that..explore the alternate view?..They just declare anything socialist,radical ,racist...you name it they say it..That's the difference.They spew hate and divisive rhetoric for the sake of destoying not informing...their lies and distortions are constantly exposed but the audience they subscribe too doesn't seem to care!!!
        They are often telling you "what this is about is"...Reparations,full take over of the country,taking your freedoms,blah blah blah!!!This is Malarkey .....There is nothing that radical going on with our form of government.This President was handed the worse combination of domestic and international crises and all they do is tear down everything he says and paints any reasonable response/decision as some "ism" and
        use innuendo and intentional lies to pander and indoctrinate..but they defended any criticism of GW Bush as unpatriotic!!!!
        Anyone seeking to be informed can see the difference between Fox and other networks..even if you don't agree with either side!Fox continues to promote Teabaggers,Birthers,Secessionists,and regularly defend liars,racists,fearmongerers and bigots.Who else would use an ex-mafia criminal,convicted felon( G. Gordon Liddy),disgraced racist cop liar( Mark Furhman),illegal arms dealer(Oliver North) as expert commentators at the same time they question the character,motives and actions of the POTUS,1st Lady,V Pres,elected Democrats and anybody that disagrees with their position..Its NOT Journalism(which does include Opinions/Commentary..). Fox is a one sided continuous smear campaign...They are indefensible..they make up something or spin it irrationally then say they are the only one "telling this story"If they were right ,other cable networks would do the same to get ratings up....Every right wing kook issue they bascially support or don't challenge (exception is Shepherd Smith)when they bring on wild conspiracy theorists every day. It is SAD that people want to be misinformed..just check the polls, Fox viewers are way out in front on being misinformed!!!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jack1888 (September 10, 2009 11:12 am ET)
        3
      Van jones was brought down by Van JONES by his own words and his own actions no one else
      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (September 10, 2009 4:57 pm ET)
        1  
        Keep telling yourself that, and perhaps one day enough repitition will magically make it come true...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pointofview (September 10, 2009 8:21 pm ET)
            1
          Snoopy

          You are right. Jones did nothing wrong.

          I mean, is it really his fault he signed a truther petition??

          Is it really his fault he said that he was a communist??

          Is it really his fault that when forced to apologize...he gave a lame..."if i offended anyone" apology?

          Thanks snoopy...for pointing out how UNFAIR it was to examine who Jones really is. Thanks for showing us that we should ignore his own words, and pretend we did not hear them.

          This was an unfair right wing attack. I Hate when the republicans use an individual's actual words, and real life actions. They should be ashamed!! Thanks snoopy, for showing us the light!!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by ohyaright (September 10, 2009 7:51 pm ET)
        1
      Gee, it's kinda funny no one is defending ACORN today. Were the tapes too much for y'all? You should know what's going on, since EVERYONE watches Fox News!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by robrob (September 11, 2009 1:38 am ET)
      1  
      HANNITY: I don't think so. By the way, we got one -- we got rid of one, and my job starting tomorrow night is to get rid of every other one. I promise you that.

      Wow, that's certainly "fair & balanced" isn't it?
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.