About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Moore falsely suggested all small business would be taxed under health care reform

September 04, 2009 7:46 am ET — 43 Comments

Appearing on Fox News, Wall Street Journal senior economics writer Stephen Moore again falsely suggested that health care reform legislation would "impose an 8 percent payroll tax on" all small businesses, which would "increase the cost of hiring a new worker." In fact, the "8-percent payroll tax" in the House health care reform bill is a penalty on certain employers who do not provide health care coverage to their employees; businesses that provide health care coverage would be exempt from the tax.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Moore again suggests all small businesses would face 8-percent payroll tax

From the September 3 edition of Fox News' On the Record with Greta Van Susteren:

MOORE: By the way, Martha, I can't resist saying the other thing that makes people so angry that are small businessmen and women like this woman, Catherine, is that they are the -- what we call in Washington the "pay for." They have to pay for everything that Barack Obama wants to do. So if you look at who's going to finance this huge trillion-dollar health care bill, it's going to be financed largely through payroll taxes imposed on small businesses.

Now, look, Martha, I've run a small business. I ran a small business with 15 employees once. You know, you -- it's -- it's hard to imagine, if you haven't done it, if you haven't met a payroll, if you don't know what it's like to -- to lose sleep on whether you can keep your business open at night because you don't know whether the next check is coming in -- you're going to impose an 8-percent payroll tax on those small businesses? They're going to have to lay off workers if you do that.

[...]

MOORE: Well, especially because, Martha -- Martha, tomorrow, we got the unemployment numbers that are coming out, and we're expecting a little -- you know, another 250,000 jobs lost. So why in the world would you want to increase the cost of hiring a new worker when we're trying to put 15 million new workers -- unemployed workers back to work?

Moore previously stated: "Every time a business hires a new worker, they'd have to pay an 8-percent tax." Moore previously said: "People forget that one of the major ways that this health care bill is paid for is on the backs of small businesses, and there's an employment tax. Every time a business hires a new worker, they'd have to pay an 8 percent tax under this bill -- my goodness." [On the Record, 8/12/09]

Businesses that provide health coverage would not pay 8-percent penalty

8-percent tax is actually a penalty on certain employers who do not provide health care coverage to their employees. The House tri-committee bill states that the tax applies only to employers who elect not to provide sufficient health care coverage as described in the bill:

''(c) EMPLOYERS ELECTING TO NOT PROVIDE HEALTH BENEFITS. -

'(1) IN GENERAL. -- In addition to other taxes, there is hereby imposed on every nonelecting employer an excise tax, with respect to having individuals in his employ, equal to 8 percent of the wages (as defined in section 3121(a)) paid by him with respect to employment (as defined in section 3121(b)). [America's Affordable Health Choices Act]

Not all small businesses that do not offer health care coverage would face 8-percent penalty. The House bill states that businesses with payrolls of less than $250,000 would not pay a penalty for failing to provide health care coverage to their employees. Of businesses that do not provide health care and whose payroll exceeds $250,000, the penalty varies depending on the size of the company's payroll. The bill establishes an excise tax of 2 percent of payroll for businesses with combined payroll between $250,000 and $300,000; a 4-percent penalty for businesses with $300,000 to $350,000 in payroll; and a 6-percent penalty for businesses with $350,000 to $400,000 in payroll. The full 8-percent tax applies only to businesses with payrolls that exceed $400,000. [America's Affordable Health Choices Act]

Moore has repeatedly advanced falsehoods and misinformation about Democrats' economic policies

Moore falsely claimed President Obama "won't ... cut taxes" after Obama already had done so. Moore said of the Obama administration's plans for dealing with the economic situation: "The one thing this administration won't do is cut taxes." In fact, the recovery act included $288 billion in tax relief. [On the Record, 7/7/09]

Moore falsely accused Frank of "involvement in giving a blank check to Fannie and Freddie." Moore falsely accused Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) of "involvement in giving a blank check to Fannie and Freddie," echoing the oft-repeated myth that Frank fought efforts to strengthen congressional oversight over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. [CNBC's Street Signs, 5/13/09]

Moore falsely claimed Obama "never used the word 'entrepreneur' " in speech. Moore falsely claimed that Obama "never used the word 'entrepreneur' " in an April 14 speech on the economy. In fact, Obama said in the speech: "If businesses and entrepreneurs know today that we are closing this carbon pollution loophole, they'll start investing in clean energy now." [CNBC's The Kudlow Report, 4/14/09]

Moore advanced McCaughey health care falsehood. Moore echoed a falsehood advanced by former New York Lt. Gov. Betsy McCaughey in claiming that the economic recovery bill includes a provision that would "hav[e] the government essentially dictate treatments." [Fox News' America's Newsroom, 2/10/09]

Transcript

From the September 3 edition of Fox News' On the Record with Greta Van Susteren:

MOORE: By the way, Martha, I can't resist saying the other thing that makes people so angry that are small businessmen and women like this woman, Catherine, is that they are the -- what we call in Washington the "pay for." They have to pay for everything that Barack Obama wants to do. So if you look at who's going to finance this huge trillion-dollar health care bill, it's going to be financed largely through payroll taxes imposed on small businesses.

Now, look, Martha, I've run a small business. I ran a small business with 15 employees once. You know, you -- it's -- it's hard to imagine, if you haven't done it, if you haven't met a payroll, if you don't know what it's like to -- to lose sleep on whether you can keep your business open at night because you don't know whether the next check is coming in -- you're going to impose an 8 percent payroll tax on those small businesses? They're going to have to lay off workers if you do that.

MARTHA MacCALLUM (guest host): Well, that's exactly --

MOORE: If you make labor more expensive --

MacCALLUM: -- what they'll do.

MOORE: -- they're going to lay them off.

MacCALLUM: Yeah, and --

MOORE: And by the way --

MacCALLUM: -- that's -- that, you know, makes progress go in the opposite direction in terms of --

MOORE: Exactly.

MacCALLUM: -- producing jobs in this country.

MOORE: Well, especially because, Martha -- Martha, tomorrow, we got the unemployment numbers that are coming out, and we're expecting a little -- you know, another 250,000 jobs lost. So why in the world would you want to increase the cost of hiring a new worker when we're trying to put 15 million new workers -- unemployed workers back to work?

MacCALLUM: Well, you know, these are very good issues and they need to be focused on as, you know, they come back from the break and they're going to sit down, supposedly, and try to rework some of this bill.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Brabantio (September 04, 2009 8:06 am ET)
      2  
      Not to say that Moore himself said this, but I so often hear people talk about how people need to work harder instead of asking for help. Go to night school, get a promotion, work another job. That sort of thing.

      Why doesn't that same sentiment apply to businesses? If they can't afford the 8% (or 4%, 6%), then shouldn't they just work harder? Steal customers from competitors, advertise more, run promotions? Why doesn't the same pie-in-the-sky reasoning apply there?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (September 04, 2009 8:14 am ET)
        2  
        Lets not bring sanity into this debate. Gee-sh!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by NG_Officer (September 04, 2009 9:00 am ET)
        2  
        Or have a car wash...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by oscar the grouch (September 04, 2009 9:28 am ET)
          1
        They (the small businesses) will be able to handle the 8% (example) tax, but your cup of Java in the am will probably go up 20% (example) to compensate.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mk3872 (September 04, 2009 9:49 am ET)
          3 1
          That makes absolutely no sense at all
          Report Abuse
          • Author by oscar the grouch (September 04, 2009 8:02 pm ET)
            1 1
            You apparently don't realize that businesses don't pay taxes, they pass along the cost (plus some extra for administrative costs). Ah well.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by wulverine3923 (September 04, 2009 8:57 pm ET)
              1  
              they do that anyway, not for taxes, and not for the workers, but for the guys at the top, and the shareholders. Remember, business has treated both its workers, and its customers shoddily in the USA. We get less bang for the buck here, and more headaches and far less money comparative to other countries and their "socialization" they also enjoy a safety net that is far better for them, than anything we have here.

              People want consumers to spend, first things first, they need a raise, they get a raise, they'll spend the money. The middle class hasn't gotten any kind of a raise in more than 50 years. Thats conservatism for ya. The guy that starts the business gets all the money, the guy who makes it run, and keeps it running, gets nothing. Thats justice Amerikan style.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by oscar the grouch (September 04, 2009 10:37 pm ET)
                  1
                The middle class may not have gotten a raise, but a heck of a lot of people have moved from middle class (and lower) up. That's one of the great things about this county, opportunities exist, the pursuit of happiness still exists. Does that mean all opportunities will provide equal outcomes? No.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by loonz (September 05, 2009 8:21 pm ET)
                  1  
                  No. The US along with England are the most class rigid countries in the Western World.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by mk3872 (September 05, 2009 1:14 am ET)
              1  
              Businesses don't pay taxes?? Maybe you should sign-up for Accounting 101 at your local community college, dude.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by National_Insecurity (September 05, 2009 3:23 am ET)
            1
          You've never run a business, have you Grouch?

          Let's play business owner:

          Cost of labor, even in food service where labor is a big component, is about 30% of costs. 8% of 30% is about 2.4% increase in price. A Grande Latte at Starbucks will zoom from $3.25 to $3.33 - 8 cents.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 04, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
        2  
        ...I so often hear people talk about how people need to work harder instead of asking for help.

        That's my view of it too, Brabantio. There was only one time in my life that taxes were really an outrage to me. I was in high school, working at a gas station, making 4 bucks and something an hour. It was my first non-cash job, and I was furious at the bite taken out of my first paycheck.

        But I didn't stay mad very long. I worked harder, made more money, and taxes became less of a problem. My rate went up, I actually paid more in taxes, but it always worked out that as I got better jobs and worked harder, I had more money to keep after taxes.

        Whenever I hear people whining about taxes, I assume they're lazy or not very capable.

        BTW, right wing buzzword of the day on health care seems to be "Washington-centric". I had the tube on this morning, flipping through news channels, and heard it 3 times in about 15 minutes.

        The definition seems to be this; Democratically elected leader, supported by a majority of people,implies that he may push through legislation that was a major part of his platform, regardless of the angry minority's attempts to misinform the public and create obstacles to enacting the will of the people.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by dave (September 04, 2009 9:49 am ET)
      1 6
      Got to love this administration. Either you provide health insurance, or we will penalize you. Nice. Either way, we will drive your costs up. Is it any wonder businessess, if they can, go overseas to avoid the govt nonsense and taxation?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by NG_Officer (September 04, 2009 10:16 am ET)
        4  
        God forbid that corporations should be taxed for using the resources of teh United States.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dave (September 04, 2009 10:43 am ET)
          1 3
          I have no problem with them paying taxes. I think the taxes are high, but that's for another day. The problem I have is that they are subject to penalization now, for not providing health insurance. Why is this the govts business, and what does this have to do with the country's resources?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mk3872 (September 04, 2009 10:47 am ET)
            4  
            That is how you provide univeral coverage without eliminating employer-provided health insurance.

            It is a mandate to OFFER health insurance to your employees if you are over a certain size.

            Apparently you do not like it. That is fine.

            Stephen Moore is a liar when he says all small businesses will be taxed under this plan.

            That is a lie.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by steeve (September 04, 2009 11:44 am ET)
            3 1
            You're right. Get single payer and remove the absurdity of businesses having anything to do with health insurance.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by dave (September 04, 2009 12:40 pm ET)
              1 2
              The absurd thing is the govt penalizing a business for not providing health insurance, which they shouldn't be forced to do in the first place...it used to be a perk.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by oscar the grouch (September 04, 2009 8:22 pm ET)
              2  
              Get single payer and who is going to pay the premiums if not the majority of the taxpayers (including small business persons), despite what is being said about how it will be funded.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by steeve (September 04, 2009 8:32 pm ET)
                1 1
                Single payer is proven by copious worldwide examples to cut health care costs in half.

                I'd rather ask what the small business owners and others are going to do with the huge mountain of free money they'll have when their exorbitant bills are slashed. But you're the grouch.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by oscar the grouch (September 04, 2009 10:32 pm ET)
                     
                  And it looks from at least a few examples that the cost cutting is somewhat at the expense of the health care professionals (nurses, doctors, etc) or at the expense of the general population (What is the per capita income in some of those countries compared to the US.) If you think that we can run the health care in this country on 8% rather than 15% of GDP, I'm glad I won't be around when the bills come due. Could costs be less than 15%? Surely. Can they reach 8%? Not too likely. I have read many here looking for a $1000 policy that will cover everything, that certainly won't happen in the 8% range.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by steeve (September 05, 2009 12:29 am ET)
                    1  
                    With extremely minor exceptions, every single country in the world spends less than 60% per capita that the US does. That of course include first-world countries with health care as good as ours who have been doing it for years.

                    Since your post is incomprehensible in light of that fact, this must be the first time you heard it. Which means the media is doing its job.
                    Report Abuse
      • Author by pbeat (September 04, 2009 10:27 am ET)
        1  
        What a hypocrite you are dave. I don't see you up in arms about being forced to pay car insurance. Why in the hell would your car be more important than a human. I don't see you up in arms about a company that refuses to pay their employees health insurance like Walmart who only hires part time and tells their employees to get on Medicaid. Oh, No, Just "this administration." "government nonsense" as you call it when a government actually cares about all of its citizens and the rising cost of health care that is going to cripple this country if traitors like you decide to take your company out of our beloved America. Money is your god. Not your fellow Americans, not your children, just your money. And in the end when you can't afford the $100,000 triple bypass surgery when you are 80, you turn to the government to pay for it. You should bow your head in shame.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dave (September 04, 2009 1:22 pm ET)
          1 2
          Hypocrite? Hardly. Its not my neighbors or my employers responsibility to pay for my car insurance. Why should they pay for my healthcare? And no, I'm not up in arms about Walmart because I don't think its their duty to make sure their employees have health insurance. As I've stated, health insurance used to be a perk from the employer...now under BO, its now become a punishable requirement.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by loonz (September 04, 2009 2:15 pm ET)
            1  
            We're a moral country and if someone gets severely sick we treat them but we do have to pay the bill. It's either the employer or all of us collectively.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by dave (September 04, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
                1
              Its not all of us collectively. Some of us who do not work do not pay squat for healthcare, but will use it. Since this nonsense will pass in one form or another, here's a suggestion. Add co pays to everybody. Quit treating illegals with COBRA, etc. Deporting is cheaper. Eliminate anchor baby's families from healthcare. And while we may have to pay the bills eventually, under the current group of big spenders, I'll be 5000 years old before we get the next balanced budget. But I'll sure as hell see an increase in my already high taxes.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by loonz (September 04, 2009 4:04 pm ET)
                1  
                Three things:

                - Only a depraved individual would say we shouldn't treat people who are sick.

                - I don't think anyone of us wants to go down the path of the government asking individuals for their papers without probably cause.

                - A lot of illegal immigrants pay taxes.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by dave (September 04, 2009 4:16 pm ET)
                    1
                  Three more things:

                  Employers are not responsible for your health insurance...you are.

                  Govt should ask for legal documentation if the individual wishes to receive healthcare.

                  I'm sure some illegals do pay taxes, but unless you can state they are here legally, the point is moot.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by loonz (September 04, 2009 5:41 pm ET)
                    1  
                    - If an American is not able to pay for his own health care somebody will. I prefer the employer pays if he has the resources.

                    - The government should ask for documentation only if it has probable cause that a crime has been committed.

                    -The point is not moot. A lot of them pay taxes and they get nothing in return. And the government counts and depends on the taxes illegal immigrants are putting into the Social Security system to calculate its solvency.
                    Report Abuse
          • Author by fantagor (September 04, 2009 3:53 pm ET)
            2  
            I agree. I'm sick and tired of paying to put out my neighbors' fires, and paying for my neighbors' roads, and for my neighbors' police investigations, not to mention my neighbors' children's education. It’s time these people stood on their own two feet and formed their own military, too. I’m tired of paying for my neighbors’ wars as well.

            Randy
            Report Abuse
      • Author by BillJ-MN (September 04, 2009 11:32 am ET)
        4  
        Is it any wonder businessess, if they can, go overseas to avoid the govt nonsense and taxation? - dave

        The funny thing is that if they go overseas they're going to countries that have universal health care with tax structures in place to pay for it. Those countries fund that coverage and their businesses are still able to operate at lower costs than our businesses pay for health care coverage.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by loonz (September 04, 2009 2:12 pm ET)
        1  
        If a company has the resources to provide health insurance to their employees and yet it doesn't, they're potentially leaving tax payers and people with insurance with the bill if one of those employees gets severely sick.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dave (September 04, 2009 2:23 pm ET)
            2
          True enough, and under the current legislation being discussed by the left, they will be further subject to an 8% penalty. Got to love those D's. This is one reason why the left gets the fair or unfair label of not being business friendly. Anything to legally grab more money, though.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by loonz (September 04, 2009 3:55 pm ET)
               
            They can avoid any penalties by providing their employees with health insurance. Anyway, it's good business practice.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by dave (September 04, 2009 4:20 pm ET)
                 
              Is it a good business practice to offer health insurance, or a way to get out of paying a penalty to the Feds? And if you say its a good for an employer forced health insurance program, why not force them also to pay for your car insurance?
              Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (September 04, 2009 9:53 am ET)
      2  
      Yes, well, in the Club for Growth world of Stephen Moore, ANY business tax and ANY regulation against business is fascist, communist and will lead to the destruction of capitalism and America as we know it.

      Just think, if the next Republican majority in the Fed Govt is driven by Club for Growth (Moore's organization) and their desire to get govt completely out of business taxes and regulations, we'll see 10x more of the bank & mortgage collapses that we all just got hammered by.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pbeat (September 04, 2009 10:36 am ET)
           
        I still have a problem with lumping fascists and communists in the same category. Communism is control of business by the government. Facsism is control of the government by business. The latter is the Bush ideology, where lobbyists were writing legislation and getting their paid for Senators to pass it. The former doesn't exist here and nobody has that intention. Business without regulation is Fascism. These companies are able to convince Americans (Fox Americans) that Obama is the facsist. How Orwelian is that? East is our friend and we are war with the West. No wait, West is our friend and we are at war with the East. Wake up America. Use wikopedia or something. Turn off FOX....They are being allowd to run the henhouse.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by steeve (September 04, 2009 11:38 am ET)
      2  
      Businesses are already taxed by having to provide health care at twice the price of the rest of the world.

      The purpose of government is to serve the rich. If the rich want to be properly served, they must vote for democrats. Otherwise they get economic meltdown and huge health and energy bills.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by vhw28672478 (September 04, 2009 3:17 pm ET)
      1  
      Tax cut for rich do not work
      Report Abuse
    • Author by National_Insecurity (September 05, 2009 3:32 am ET)
      1  
      Stephen Moore is no friend of small business owners.

      First off, he's in the pocket of billionaires as their mouthpiece and idea guy. He acts like a mensche but is a weasel.

      Moore is the guy who championed Bush tax cuts that eviscerated 70 million small businesses, and benefitted perhaps 500,000 multi-millionaires.

      Moore is the guy who thinks that lazy trust fund babies like Paris Hilton should be taxed less than inventors and entrepreneurs who actually create jobs and add value to the nation.

      Moore is the guy who doesn't admit that we will have more job creation and more innovation with a Single Payer plan because startups like mine will more easily be able to attract experienced people from big companies who need health care for their families.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (September 06, 2009 9:07 am ET)
         
      the nerve of maccallum to concur with such a ridiculous claim. "well, that's exactly what they'll do"... please.

      these blonds on fox news are like robots... they just sit there, look pretty and cute and repeat (or agree) what republican talking points that are said in their ear piece.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.