About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Conservative media's culture of "death" poisons health care debate

August 28, 2009 11:10 am ET — 25 Comments

Radio host Laura Ingraham, guest-hosting Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, and conservative columnist Andrea Tantaros asserted that the Democrats are "playing the death card," using Sen. Edward M. Kennedy's death to promote health care reform in his name. Ingraham and Tantaros' comments are the latest in a long line of attempts by conservatives to attack Democrats and progressives by attaching the word "death" to progressive initiatives, most recently in the debate over health care reform.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

"Death Card"

Ingraham: "[T]he Democrats are playing the death card again." During the August 27 edition of The O'Reilly Factor, Ingraham stated, "Remember when the funeral service for Minnesota Senator Paul Wellstone was under way and it turned into a raucous Democratic campaign rally for Walter Mondale? It was embarrassing and exploitative, and we know how that one turned out." She continued: "Now the Democrats are playing the death card again, wrapping their wildly unpopular health care bill in the sentimental gauze of Ted Kennedy's memory."

Tantaros: "[L]ast week, they played the God card. Now ... they're playing the death card." Later in the program, following Ingraham's statement that "what's happening with the Democratic Party and the attempt to use his death to ram this bill through, I think is frankly disgusting," Tantaros said: "Well, that's absolutely right. I mean, last week, they played the God card. Now, as you said in your memo, they're playing the death card. And I think it is pretty pitiful when you have to invoke the memory of a deceased senator to get your bill through."

"Death Panel"

Palin introduced false "death panel" smear. In an August 7 Facebook post, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin claimed that under Democratic health care reform, "my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama's 'death panel' so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their 'level of productivity in society,' whether they are worthy of health care."

Conservative media ran with "death panels." Numerous conservative media figures either adopted or promoted Palin's "death panel" term, or advanced or expressed support for her assertion, which is based on the widely debunked claim that the House health care reform bill would require end-of-life counseling.

Conservative media retreated to "de facto death panels." After the "death panel" attack had been debunked in the media more than 40 times, conservatives turned to claiming that the health care reform plans include "de facto death panels." For instance, in his August 17 New York Post column, Fox News contributor Dick Morris wrote: "The whole 'reform' scheme is one giant death panel in its own right."

"Death Book"

Towey: VHA manual pushing a "hurry-up-and-die message." Following false accusations that the Democrats' health care reform legislation would institute "death panels," former Bush administration official James Towey claimed in a Wall Street Journal op-ed that the Obama administration has revived a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) booklet on advanced planning directives that will "steer vulnerable individuals to conclude for themselves that life is not worth living," calling the booklet a "death book."

Conservative media ran with "death book." As with the death panel smear, conservative media have promoted Towey's false "death book" claim, ignoring facts that undermine his rhetoric. For instance, The Washington Times asserted that "the Death Book is instructive as a reflection on Obamacare priorities and perspectives and what the administration might view as a 'waste.' " [The Washington Times, 8/26/09]

"Death Care"

Conservatives use "Death care" term for voluntary end-of-life counseling provision. In an August 7 Facebook post promoting Palin's "death panel" attack, radio host Tammy Bruce asserted: "Palin Comes Through, Slams DeathCare."

Other conservative media figures have referred to Dems' health care plans as "death care." After a caller referred to the end-of-life counseling sessions as "death care," Rush Limbaugh stated: "I will be damned if it's going to become federally mandated law that the government tells every doctor -- not doctor, hires a bunch of counselors that has these death-care -- as you call it -- death-care discussions, end-of-life discussions." [The Rush Limbaugh Show, 7/30/09] Other conservative media figures have also advanced the "death care" term.

"Death Tax"

Luntz found "death tax" polls better than "estate tax" for conservatives. As Media Matters for America has noted, many conservatives refer to the estate tax as the "death tax," a name that, as Republican consultant Frank Luntz found, polls better for conservatives.

Several media figures have adopted term "death tax" for estate tax. Several media figures have used the term "death tax" while discussing the estate tax, which is the official name of the tax in the U.S. Code. For instance, Fox News' Molly Henneberg stated on April 1, "[I]f you're going to die, I guess next year's not the year to do it, as some people were thinking. You know, the death tax was supposed to go away next year. The death tax had been 55 percent last year, but then President George W. Bush's 2001 tax cuts had decreased it -- or had planned for it to decrease -- and it will decrease to 45 percent this year, and then eliminate it altogether next year. But it appears that will not happen now." [Fox News' America's Newsroom, 4/1/09]

"Party of Death"

Conservative Ramesh Ponnuru wrote the book "The Party of Death." In 2006, National Review senior editor Ramesh Ponnuru wrote a book titled, "The Party of Death: The Democrats, the Media, the Courts, and the Disregard for Human Life" (Regnery Publishing, April 2006). In a Q&A about the book, Ponnuru stated that "the Democratic party has become the party of unrestricted abortion, lethal research on human embryos, and euthanasia. The way I put it is that the party of death has largely taken over the Democratic party and has an outpost in the Republican party too." [National Review Online, 4/24/06]

Transcript

From the August 27 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

INGRAHAM: It only took a few hours after the death of Ted Kennedy for Democrats to begin using his death to guilt lawmakers and the public into supporting ObamaCare. Poll after poll shows us that the people don't want this massive government intrusion into our medical choices, yet Democrats don't seem to care -- slap the Kennedy name on the bill and fast-forward to the signing ceremony.

This is emotional manipulation of the rankest order. Democrats have tried this tactic before. Remember 2002? Remember when the funeral service for Minnesota Senator Paul Wellstone was under way and it turned into a raucous Democratic campaign rally for Walter Mondale? It was embarrassing and exploitative, and we know how that one turned out.

Now the Democrats are playing the death card again, wrapping their wildly unpopular health care bill in the sentimental gauze of Ted Kennedy's memory.

[...]

INGRAHAM: Ladies, look, this is a tough subject because, obviously, the country's remembering the contributions of Senator Kennedy. Whether you're Republican or Democrat, you honor the man's memory and what he tried to do for people -- whether you disagree with him or agree with him. But what's happening with the Democratic Party and the attempt to use his death to ram this bill through, I think is frankly disgusting. Andrea, your take?

TANTAROS: Well, that's absolutely right. I mean, last week, they played the God card. Now, as you said in your memo, they're playing the death card. And I think it is pretty pitiful when you have to invoke the memory of a deceased senator to get your bill through.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by The_Cat (August 28, 2009 11:46 am ET)
      4 2
      Actually, what is wildly unpopular is mostly fiction. The public doesn't want death panels, rationing, bureaucratic intrusion between doctor and patient, or for their grandparents to be unplugged to save money. This is the 'wildly unpopular' health reform you are referring to.

      Fortunately, none of that is in health reform legislation: it only exists in the conservative MSM, such as what you two females are involved in. I can't call you ladies, as you have proved you are not worthy of the compliment.

      As for playing the God card, I suspect you are upset only because you consider such actions to be the sole province of the conservatives who are renowned for this type of behavior. Truth is, I didn't hear anybody in the Obama administration use a 'God card'.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by obamaisasocialist (August 28, 2009 12:40 pm ET)
        1 8
        Regarding playing the God Card, wasn't it Obama who wined about people "bearing false wintness" with respect to obamacare? I don't now what he is compalining about. The only false witness statements i've heard have come from Nancy Pelosi and the Yes We Can Ensemble.

        By the way how can you beleive that government intrusion is not part of a government run health plan. "If there's a blue pill and a red pill, and the blue pill is half the price of the red pill and works just as well, why not pay half price for the thing that's going to make you well?" -- President Obama I have to think if my Doctor is recommending the red pill there are reasons for it. In any case, which pill I take is a private matter between me and my doctor and the governemnt needs to butt out.



        Report Abuse
        • Author by wookie (August 28, 2009 1:35 pm ET)
          5 1
          Bearing false witness? That's all you've got? It's a good thing he didn't declare Jesus Day, huh? As far as the rest of your rant, here is the operative phrase

          "and works just as well"
          Report Abuse
          • Author by obamaisasocialist (August 28, 2009 3:19 pm ET)
            1 3
            I trust my doctor to know how the pill will effect me better then I do a government employee and so should you. Bear in mind pills effect all of us differently. I dream of a day when a pill be judged by its content and not the color of its skin. I am proud my country and its excellent healthcare system which provides access to all, even those who have entered here illegaly. Obama's plan to "save" money by trying to micro-manage what pills the doctor prescribes to his patience will not improve the healthcare system.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by The_Cat (August 28, 2009 7:22 pm ET)
              1 1
              You should trust your doctor, otherwise the quality of your care will suffer. I'd be wary of new pills, however. Since the FDA began streamlining new drugs onto the market, there has been a huge jump in the number of medications recalled due to unfortunate side effects. Like death.

              The point of health coverage reform is more insurance for more people, first of all, and nonprofit competition for the for-profit insurance companies to help drive costs down. If costs are not brought under control soon, NO ONE will be able to afford insurance.

              It's not about the care you receive at all. It's only about how that care will be paid for.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by dbtexas (August 29, 2009 8:04 pm ET)
                 
              1I assume you are pushing for an end to Medicare and Medicaid too? I mean, after all, socialism is socialism. No hypocrisy please
              Report Abuse
        • Author by The_Cat (August 28, 2009 1:50 pm ET)
          5 1
          President Obama did in fact point out that some people discussing health coverage reform do indeed 'bear false witness'. A nice way of calling them liars, actually. Did he reference scripture? Yes, he did. America is, for the moment, predominantly Christian, so this was a reference most people, such as yourself, would understand.

          Please show me the lie that you are accusing Nancy Pelosi of?

          How can I believe government intrusion is not part of a government run health care plan? Because it is not a government health care plan. It is a government health coverage plan. Let me answer a question with a question: Do you believe your insurance company intrudes in your health care?

          If the red pill and the blue pill have exactly the same effect, yet one costs twice as much, I think you're right. Your doctor does have a reason for recommending the red pill. He's being paid kickbacks by the makers of the red pill. They write it off as 'advertising', he pockets the money, and you and I end up paying twice what other countries do for less health care. This is the system you are defending, obamaisasocialist.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by rebopine (August 28, 2009 5:05 pm ET)
            3 1
            Thank you, Thank you "The_cat". For some reason I still cannot post live to this site but you just said everything I was thinking regarding the above post.

            Also, thanks for pointing out that we're talking about government sponsored health insurance, not healthcare. I don't know why they can't get this through their thick skulls, but they can't seem to understand the differentiation.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by The_Cat (August 28, 2009 7:18 pm ET)
                1
              Glad to be of service, rebopine. If you are new here, your posts undergo scrutiny for a while before they post them to make sure you generally abide by the rules. After a few posts, they stop and your posts will appear right away. We all go through it.

              Casting it as health care lets the conservatives fear monger about rationing, government telling doctors what to do, and of course the old 'pulling the plug on granny' chestnut. Simply put, it's a strawman argument, which is one of the right's favorite tactics, even though it is a logical fallacy.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (August 28, 2009 10:58 pm ET)
                 
              Welcome to the site!
              Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (August 28, 2009 1:54 pm ET)
          3 1
          Right now for-profit health care insurance providers come between what you and your doctor think are the best options for your health care - it's not a private matter between you and your doctor.

          The fact that you think that having a for-profit bureaucrat between you and your doctor would be better than a government (not a for-profit entity) bureaucrat in that same position is evidence that you are not well informed.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by rebopine (August 28, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
          2 1
          You're just making things up now, so I'm not suprised by your moniker. I'm also not suprised that you are supporting the assertions of Ingraham and Tantaros because they are telling boldface lies to people who regularly shape thier worldviews on bolface lies.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by themidnightreview.com (August 28, 2009 5:40 pm ET)
          1 1
          I don't see my grandparents complaining about the health care provided through Medicare.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by my4cents (August 28, 2009 10:56 pm ET)
             
          obamaisasocialist?
          what is socialism and who is a socialist?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (August 29, 2009 5:51 pm ET)
             
          I really like your "nom d'blog" obamaisasocialist. Is he also a "A-RAB"? A "NAAH-zee"? Don't hold back. Be proud of what you believe.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (August 28, 2009 1:03 pm ET)
      5 1
      A good summary. I have noticed this trend for a long time. Like the way that people like Falwell wanted to save a brain dead woman or a zygote but felt our foriegn policy should be "blow them away in the name of the Lord". And why not slap Kennedy's name on something he considered his life's work?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rebopine (August 28, 2009 5:08 pm ET)
        3 1
        Thanks for reminding everyone how important Public Healthcare was to Sen. Kennedy. All day I've seen and read how the democrats are using Sen. Kennedy's death to push this bill through, do they not realize that this piece of legislation has been a goal of his for 40 years?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by my4cents (August 28, 2009 11:02 pm ET)
             
          MMFA, please disable the text box that enables ONE person to post with infinite handles.
          First sentence, agree 100%.
          Second sentence, are you for or against health care reform?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (August 28, 2009 3:23 pm ET)
      4 1
      The corporate talkers have tried their best to poison the debate, all in the interests of the health care industry, which pumps huge amounts of money and talking points into foundations, phony "grass-roots" groups and into shills like Glen Beck and Sean Hannity. It's all very sick.
      For a healthy perspective, here's a good read from the UK:
      http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/mary-dejevsky/mary--dejevsky-a-mean-streak-in-the-us-mainstream-1776795.html
      Report Abuse
    • Author by papa bear3 (August 28, 2009 3:39 pm ET)
      6 1
      where is Mort Sahl when we need him, "Liberals feel unworthy of their possessions. Conservatives feel they deserve everything they've stolen."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by goshzilla (August 28, 2009 4:17 pm ET)
      5 1
      Fox News has an interest in opposing the right to end your life once you reach a vegetative state. Who else would be left to watch their programing.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (August 28, 2009 4:29 pm ET)
      2 1
      You know what, waving the bloody shirt has been a popular political tool since Lincoln's assassination in 1865. Teddy Kennedy wanted Health Care Reform and I don't think he would mind in the least if it gets there over his dead body. So, please join me when I say proudly and loudly "Let's win this one for Teddy!"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fran2 (August 28, 2009 6:19 pm ET)
      1 1
      Call me naive; I really thought Americans would have been so fed up by now with those anachronisms we call "private health insurers" that the health care debate would rise above the usual red vs blue "culture wars" crap. I figured we would all be clamoring for a viable option to the avarice and blatant inhumanity of our current "health as points on a spreadsheet" model.

      Although it is true that a majority of Americans support a "public option," it is truly mind boggling how many of us are fighting like enraged badgers to defeat it.

      It's just another discouraging reminder of what corporate money, leased politicians, the gullible, and people still fighting the Viet Nam War can do when they come together in common cause. Yikes!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (August 28, 2009 10:31 pm ET)
      1 1
      the fox news viewers continue to be misinformed, and the poll showing the amount of people who believe this BS will continue to rise.

      and beck asks: "when will someone in the media expose all of the lies?" well glenny, all of your lies (and the rest of your network) has been exposed. you can thank us all later when youre stuck in the unemployment office later.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by the7sticks3363 (August 29, 2009 2:05 am ET)
         
      I've been reading about this, quote unquote, "culture of death" nonsense for years, and it originated with those anti-abortion activists who had a problem about Michael Schivo removing Terri Schivo's feeding tube and started that whole campaign to "Save Terri". Honestly, these people ought to rent Million Dollar Baby one of these days and see why some people need to have an assisted suicide. And when these people say "culture of death", are they talking about those goth kids who dress in black and listen to The Cure or something? Just askin'.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.