About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox runs "Abortion: growing ... growing ... gone" fetus graphic during health care segment

July 20, 2009 12:19 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Fox News aired an anti-choice graphic sourced to the American Life League featuring a fetus and the words, "Abortion: growing ... growing ... gone," during a segment asking if "health care reform" will result in federally funded abortions.

120 Comments

During the July 20 edition of America's Newsroom, Fox News aired an anti-choice graphic featuring a fetus and the words, "Abortion: growing ... growing ... gone," during a segment asking if "health care reform" will result in federally funded abortions. Fox News sourced the graphic to the American Life League (ALL), which describes itself as the "largest grassroots Catholic pro-life education organization in the United States." The "growing ... growing ... gone" graphic was used for ALL's 2008 National Pro-Life T-shirt Day.

Co-host Megyn Kelly provided no explanation for Fox News' promotion of the anti-choice graphic.

foxabortion2

foxabortion1

From the American Life League:

tshirt

tshirt2

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by magnolialover (July 20, 2009 12:22 pm ET)
      6 2
      That's all class right there.

      Why couldn't federal funds be used for a legal medical procedure? This is what we should be asking. There's no reason to NOT use federal funds for such a thing.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (July 20, 2009 12:25 pm ET)
      5 1
      It's a legal medical procedure.

      And, before the wingnuts show up. No "babies are killed" by abortion.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pointofview (July 20, 2009 12:38 pm ET)
        2 13
        Babies are killed by EVERY ABORTION.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (July 20, 2009 12:40 pm ET)
          6 2
          And we're off!

          If the "baby" can survive outside of the womb, I'd agree with you, but since they cannot in the case of abortion (performed before the fetus is viable and able to live on its own outside the woman's body), you're wrong as per usual.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pointofview (July 20, 2009 2:04 pm ET)
            1 12
            That is not what Easy idiot said. In any event, the entire POINT of an abortion is to kill a baby.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Victor Colorado (July 20, 2009 2:11 pm ET)
              4  
              How old are babies?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (July 20, 2009 2:50 pm ET)
              3 1
              No, it is not the entire point of an abortion.

              The point of an abortion is to abort a non viable fetus from the womb of a mother.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Joe_Bagadonuts (July 20, 2009 10:23 pm ET)
                1 1
                A person is a person no matter how young or old. A baby is a baby from the time of conception. I used to be pro-abort which was very convenient for my past promiscuous life style until one evening I took a night off from chasing skirts and just by chance watched the documentary, "The Miracle of Life." Until then I had no ideal of the truth that takes place in a pregnant woman's womb. This new knowledge created such a deep guilt in me for my attitude towards unborn babies and their mothers that I broke down and cried. I believe the best way to stop abortions is to educate people to the truth that a baby is a baby at the time of conception, the horror's of what takes place during an abortion, and the physical and mental health problems that commonly engulf the mom's who abort. Abortion is truly infanticide for birth control. I was once called a hypocrite because I don't possess the same passion for the executions that take place in our prisons. Fine. Then don't call me pro-life, call me Pro-Birth instead but I'm still a hypocrite in something somewhere. We're all hypocrites. IC XC NIKA
                Report Abuse
                • Author by open_mind (July 21, 2009 8:58 am ET)
                  1 1
                  That's all well and good. An acorn is not an oak tree and a fetus is not a baby. You are welcome to think of them that way if you like, that does not mean you are entitled to your own facts.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (July 21, 2009 12:42 pm ET)
                  1 1
                  A baby is a baby from the time of conception.
                  That's your opinion. You are free to have it. It's not mine.

                  Don't like abortion, don't have one.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by open_mind (July 21, 2009 12:04 am ET)
              2 1
              You have just demonstrated you do not understand the most basic biology.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by egb (July 21, 2009 3:19 am ET)
              1
            A one day old baby cannot live on its own outside the womb.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (July 21, 2009 10:23 am ET)
              1  
              "On its own" meant without anything like an incubator or respirator, I'm quite sure. Nobody's talking about being able to get your own food or anything like that.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by seeryer (July 20, 2009 12:58 pm ET)
          4  
          POV,
          Do you celebrate birthdays or conception days in your family? Did you know that there were less abortions in each year of Bill Clinton's presidency than in any year of the Reagan or Bush I administrations? Who would have ever thought that sex education and condom distribution would lead to less pregnancies and in turn, less abortions. Your side will never get that though. The fact is less abortions are performed when policies promoted by the left are at the forefront.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pointofview (July 20, 2009 2:05 pm ET)
               
            I have no issue with sex ed or condom distribution. We need more of both.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (July 20, 2009 3:28 pm ET)
              3  
              You still didn't answer his question. Here it is again:
              Do you celebrate birthdays or conception days in your family?


              I have a firm policy of only asking one question of a con at a time. They are slippery folk. They will pick and choose which of the questions to address (usually in a sideways fashion) and ignore the most cogent ones.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by kilgore.trout4511165 (July 20, 2009 7:08 pm ET)
                3 1
                I celebrate my "birthday" every year on the anniversary of my birth, just as I celebrate my wedding anniversary every year on the day I married my wife rather than the day we fell in love. What's your point?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (July 20, 2009 8:00 pm ET)
                  3 1
                  I wasn't asking you. I was asking POV. Thanks anyway.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by seeryer (July 20, 2009 4:24 pm ET)
                 
              So you vote Democrat then right?
              Report Abuse
        • Author by mk3872 (July 20, 2009 1:07 pm ET)
          4  
          ... of course, completely ignoring the fact that supposed "fair & balanced" "news" channel Fox News is nothing more than right-wing advocacy ...
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Leftym0m79 (July 20, 2009 1:13 pm ET)
          3  
          Most abortions are performed before 11 weeks. Do you know what a fetus actually looks like at 9 weeks?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (July 20, 2009 1:34 pm ET)
            5  
            Here is the thing with folks like POV. They don't like abortion, OK, I get it. They also proclaim to be good Christians, and OK, I get that as well.

            Here is what I don't get. According to Christian mythology, god will judge all who come before him when they die right? Now, if POV and others are doing what they believe to be god's will, and living a godly life, why worry about people having abortions, or providing abortions. If folks like POV are correct, then they will ascend to heaven, and sit at the right hand of the father. And the rest of us heathens will go to the fiery pit of doom.

            Also, whether or not they know, they're pro choice. They choose to not have abortions. While I would also consider myself pro choice, I choose to believe that I would not consider abortion a viable practice for my wife if she were to get pregnant, and I would not have considered it a viable option if I had gotten one of my past girlfriend's pregnant in my earlier years, but I will fight to ensure that a woman can always have that choice, if she so chooses.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (July 20, 2009 2:22 pm ET)
              2  
              If folks like POV are correct, then they will ascend to heaven, and sit at the right hand of the father.

              What's more, the "babies" will also ascend to heaven.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by proudconservative (July 20, 2009 1:42 pm ET)
              13
            Just hideous isn't it? Imagine, in a short time it might end up looking like anyone of these!

            So please, abort early and often, the Chy-kahga way!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (July 20, 2009 1:47 pm ET)
              4  
              Which goes to prove, once again, you're not really funny at all, and why conservatives should just skip the comedy bit.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by proudconservative (July 20, 2009 2:12 pm ET)
                2 12
                Again, it proves that lefties just don't get it. I guess our president should pick a humor czar quickly and start a humor stimulus program!
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Victor Colorado (July 20, 2009 2:20 pm ET)
                  4  
                  Again, if you laugh long and loud enough at your own jokes, then you don't need a humor stimulus program.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by magnolialover (July 20, 2009 2:52 pm ET)
                  6  
                  No, I guess I don't get it.

                  Apparently you think it's OK to abort a baby if you think it's going to look like Al Franken?
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (July 20, 2009 1:57 pm ET)
          4  
          Babies are killed by EVERY ABORTION.
          Nope. You'r turn.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by jjamele2880 (July 20, 2009 10:19 pm ET)
          2 1
          Assuming that you are sincere in your belief that "babies are killed with every abortion," what exactly are you doing to stop it?

          I am being completely serious - if you believe that you are living in a nation in which millions of BABIES are MURDERED every year, how can you possibly be going about your life as if nothing is happening? Do you sleep at night? Do you spend your days desperately trying to keep women from using reproductive health services? Are you attempting to disrupt the procedure that you must refer to as "Murder?"

          Because honestly, if you are not doing any of those things- if your activism on behalf of unborn "babies" starts and stops with posts on a website, you are far worse than the people you condemn. You are a pious poser, who screams "murder" in between flipping channels or trying to decide which movie to catch this weekend.

          But maybe I misjudge- so please, let us know: What are you doing to stop the "murder?"
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (July 21, 2009 12:53 am ET)
               
            Because honestly, if you are not doing any of those things- if your activism on behalf of unborn "babies" starts and stops with posts on a website, you are far worse than the people you condemn.
            That's always been my point. The pro-fetus crowd's actions speak louder than words. They know deep down that a fetus is not the same as a born human being. Where's the pro-fetus John Brown?
            Report Abuse
      • Author by egb (July 21, 2009 3:18 am ET)
          1
        Babies are killed by abortion. They
        are alive and will become adults unless they are killed.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jjamele2880 (July 21, 2009 7:51 am ET)
          1  
          Same question to you- what are you doing to stop the "murder" of babies?

          If I believed that I lived in a nation in which innocent people were being murdered on a mass scale, I would do something about it other than drop a few lines into a website response page. So what are YOU doing to stop this incredible injustice?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (July 21, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
             
          Babies are killed by abortion.
          Nope. Next.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by dave (July 20, 2009 12:27 pm ET)
        4
      WITH?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (July 20, 2009 12:40 pm ET)
        5 1
        It's called Fox running conservative propoganda, somehow passing that off as "news".
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (July 20, 2009 12:47 pm ET)
          3  
          This thread should be fun. Two wingnut posts so far. One fails a quiz even after being given the answer beforehand, and the other has to ask to have the item explained.

          Open up the stoopid spigot.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by magnolialover (July 20, 2009 12:56 pm ET)
            4  
            Now all we need is the new guy who's been around lately come in a follow up with just a "?" as he's been doing on a lot of threads, sometimes more than once after someone explains it all.

            It's amazing really.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (July 20, 2009 1:46 pm ET)
              3  
              Ha ! I think that was Richardsimmons or something similar.Several posts that were essentially "?", "what" or "I don't understand the topic", then he finally mustered up a complete sentence to complain about the lack of intelligent discussion here.

              You have to appreciate him, in a way, for being concise and saving people some time going through the comments. Many of the conservative posters here need 10 or 20 posts, sometimes of several paragraphs each, to say "?" or "I don't understand.".

              Report Abuse
              • Author by magnolialover (July 20, 2009 2:02 pm ET)
                3  
                I'm pretty sure he/she was the one that kept posting:

                "Reich?"

                As in they're weren't sure how to read that one.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Victor Colorado (July 20, 2009 2:07 pm ET)
                  4  
                  He's also a double-major student at the Alanis Morissette College for Ironic Studies.
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by Leftym0m79 (July 20, 2009 12:46 pm ET)
      4  
      An abortion mandate?! Reproductive health care is basic health care. These are the same people that bemoan sex education, but then are shocked when their children have sex and end up with an std because they didn't understand the consequences of their actions or how to properly protect themselves.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (July 20, 2009 12:53 pm ET)
        2  
        I know there is a large group of Americans who are concerned about overpopulation and it's related problems.I wonder why we don't see them protesting the use of their taxes to pay for pre-natal care and childbirth services.

        Oh yeah, these are legal medical services, and reasonable adults understand that we don't get to monitor every penny of our taxes according to our personal moral or religious beliefs.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Victor Colorado (July 20, 2009 2:59 pm ET)
      4  
      [http://www.now.org/store/images/items/bt-aad.gif]

      I wonder why Fox News didn't use this graphic?

      (Oh, yeah; hell would have froze over. Forget I asked)
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (July 20, 2009 3:08 pm ET)
        4 1
        EXACTLY!

        This is the point I was trying to make up above. Nobody is forcing anyone to get abortions for crying out loud. I wouldn't suggest to anyone that I know to get one. I wouldn't suggest it to my wife if she were to get pregnant (even though we hate kids).

        For the people like POV so dead set against abortion, just don't have one, and try to influence the people in your sphere, or your life to not have one (if they're thinking about having one).

        Coming on here and saying that you're killing babies just makes me laugh, because that's about the furthest thing from the truth there ever was. Great shock value, but not even remotely true.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (July 20, 2009 3:23 pm ET)
      6 1
      Kinda makes one wonder just how fast Megyn would go and get an abortion on the off chance that she gets unexpectedly pregnant...
      whether by her husband or someone that isn't or is assaulted or that suddenly her husband decides that she needs to be pregnant 15 more times, or name your scenario?

      To be sure, you can probably bet the bank that she would go get one, even if it were made illegal. So why argue against that right?

      I find it hilariously frustrating that some of these Fox-Noise Blondie types would be so willing to work toward their very rights being taken away that were fought for the last 130 years or so by other women (several of which were conservative)?

      Of course, no matter what happens... abortion is legal and will remain so.

      Lets face it... the Republicans owned all three branches of the government for 5 years from 2001-2006 and could have easily passed laws or amendments to make abortion illegal... they did not... because for them abortion is an issue that they can keep using to get the weak minded to vote them into power and still never do anything about it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (July 20, 2009 3:51 pm ET)
        4  
        I concur with your last paragraph - the anti-abortion wackos can't understand that they're being USED.



        Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (July 20, 2009 3:46 pm ET)
      4 2
      I now encourage every single woman that see this. In fact, I would tell everyone that gives a damn about women's rights (like I am for my wife and daughters sake) to read the book --->

      "The War on Choice - The Right-Wing Attack on Women's Rights and How to Fight Back" by Gloria Feldt

      For those of you that may be rude about or want to say something derogatory about the book, author, or concept... don't waste your time, as I plan on flagging it immediately!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pointofview (July 20, 2009 4:46 pm ET)
        2 10
        I will attack the concept. There is no war on choice, only war on life. Abortion is murder, and your threat to immediately flag any comment that does not agree with you tells us all we need to know about you.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Victor Colorado (July 20, 2009 4:53 pm ET)
          4  
          I was trying to understand where you're coming from up thread but you didn't reply.... I'm trying to figure out your definition of "babies". What's your age range for a human "baby"?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pointofview (July 20, 2009 5:03 pm ET)
            1 7
            For me it is easy. Life begins at conception. Ask people who have lost a child at 6 months into a pregnancy if they mourn the death, and think they have lost a family member.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Victor Colorado (July 20, 2009 5:33 pm ET)
              4  
              I asked you what you age range for a human "baby", not when life begins.

              [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/86/Sperm-egg.jpg/299px-Sperm-egg.jpg]

              Is this a baby? Does the morning after pill murder a baby in your view?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by pointofview (July 20, 2009 5:43 pm ET)
                2 5
                and I answered you. Life begins at conception.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (July 20, 2009 6:12 pm ET)
                3  
                Give it up, Victor. I tried to get Pointy to answer some equally simple questions recently. He seems to have a lot of trouble focusing.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Victor Colorado (July 20, 2009 6:46 pm ET)
                  4  
                  Yeah, if trying to gain a simple understanding of his use of the term "baby" can't be had, it's safe to say his definition of "murdered" will also not be provided, so I'll stop here.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (July 20, 2009 5:40 pm ET)
              5  
              You're destroying your own argument. That's someone who wants a child. You're demonstrating that the value of the child relies on the will of the mother.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by pointofview (July 20, 2009 5:47 pm ET)
                  6
                Not at all barbie. You can want a baby or not, want your neighbor or not, but you can not kill based on your "wishes"
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (July 20, 2009 6:13 pm ET)
                  3  
                  Are you a vegetarian, Pointy?
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Brabantio (July 20, 2009 7:52 pm ET)
                  4  
                  And you're comparing a fetus within a woman's body to a sentient being that lives next door. A fetus is not a legal entity.

                  You're the one who used the example of someone mourning a miscarriage. If we were talking about forced abortions, you would have a point.

                  Do you think "barbie" enhances your argument?
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by Leftym0m79 (July 20, 2009 6:57 pm ET)
              4 1
              But do you also expect a woman to carry a dead baby to term? Or for that matter follow through with the pregnancy if it endangered her own life? What about ectopic pregnancies? You have your beliefs we have ours, the only difference is that we understand that the word choice, means just that, the freedom to choose whether or not to terminate the pregnancy, keep it and/or give it up for adoption.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by my4cents (July 20, 2009 8:44 pm ET)
                 
              Your belief is as well founded in reality as my belief that earth formed 6001 years ago.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by (July 21, 2009 4:20 pm ET)
                 
              Why conception? An egg is released each month from the ovaries and it is alive. If not fertilized, it dies. Is it child neglect if a woman fails to get her egg fertilized? If you believe an egg becomes human at conception this must mean the soul is delivered in the Male contribution to reproduction.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by John Paradox (July 20, 2009 4:39 pm ET)
      2  
      The idea of women NOT being pregnant?

      Next thing you know, we'll be letting them wear SHOES!!!1!one
      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnrod10 (July 20, 2009 4:54 pm ET)
      1 4
      Here is a question I havent heard anyone address yet: At what age should an abortion be legal? 1st trimester, 2nd trimester, all the way to delivery? What about after delivery? 1 day after birth? 3 days? What if the child is delivered premature?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pointofview (July 20, 2009 5:08 pm ET)
        1 5
        According to easy to refute wingnuts....the idiot that he is....he will tell you a woman never carries a baby. She has a lump of cells inside her, and then at birth...there is a baby. So for him, abortion is fine until the lump of cells is fully delivered.

        Most sane people dont see it that way.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (July 20, 2009 5:44 pm ET)
          3  
          I don't believe he said that. The point would be that it's not a "baby" until it's born. That doesn't mean that a fetus doesn't deserve protection at some stage.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (July 20, 2009 8:03 pm ET)
          2 1
          Most sane people dont see it that way.
          Actually, all sane people see it that way.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (July 20, 2009 5:43 pm ET)
        3  
        In my personal opinion, first trimester. Has anyone ever told you they think abortion should be legal all the way to delivery without a health concern? Has anyone ever suggested that babies should be killed for any reason?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by johnrod10 (July 20, 2009 6:12 pm ET)
            4
          Question 1: No. But I havent asked everyone.
          Question 2: Dont comprehend.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (July 20, 2009 7:55 pm ET)
            3  
            Well, how many people have you asked? If you get a couple of hundred answers, do you expect you'll ever hear someone say they think elective abortion should go to nine months? If not, why keep asking?

            What don't you comprehend? You said "3 days" after birth. What makes you think anyone would support killing a 3 day-old baby?
            Report Abuse
        • Author by pointofview (July 20, 2009 9:30 pm ET)
            1
          "In my personal opinion, first trimester. Has anyone ever told you they think abortion should be legal all the way to delivery without a health concern? Has anyone ever suggested that babies should be killed for any reason?" Brabantio

          Most here will not acknowledge protecting "babies" at an point until birth, or address the lack of health concerns as you do, so i am glad to see you address those.

          Looks like scott j's post however would never consider the things you mentioned. And Easy says abortion NEVER kills a baby, so we know where he stands.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (July 20, 2009 11:38 pm ET)
            1  
            Like I said above, the argument that a fetus is not a baby does not imply that there's never any protection for the fetus. It's just addressing the emotional usage of "baby". You're trying to connect two separate issues, one of protection and another of labeling.

            I'm thrilled that you appreciate my specifics, but in my experience my opinion is pretty close to those of other liberals here. I've never seen anyone so much as hint that elective abortion should go all the way to the due date, despite your assertion otherwise.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (July 20, 2009 7:48 pm ET)
        6 2
        Here is a question I havent heard anyone address yet: At what age should an abortion be legal? 1st trimester, 2nd trimester, all the way to delivery? What about after delivery? 1 day after birth? 3 days? What if the child is delivered premature?


        The problem with "questions" like yours is you're actually NOT looking for an honest answer.

        You know d*mn good and well that NO ONE has an abortion AFTER delivery, nor days AFTER delivery, so PLEASE STOP with your pathetic way of trying to make a point!

        And since you're so into asking questions, what if you're 11 year old daughter was raped by your uncle and she became pregnant? Are you going to make your young child continue her pregnancy, as a result of a rape by your uncle? Are you going to ask YOUR child to carry YOUR uncle's baby to term?

        So I'll ask YOU at what age should abortion be legal?

        See the problem is YOU can't comprehend that abortion is a deeply personal INDIVIDUAL/FAMILY decision, period!! Folks don't need YOUR opinion on what medicine to take or what surgery to have , so you can d*mn well bet, they don't need YOUR opinion on abortion!

        You don't like abortion, DON'T HAVE ONE!!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pointofview (July 20, 2009 9:23 pm ET)
          1 3
          Wow pearl, you old folks get real touchy when asked a simple question.

          Why is it that your view you needs to be the one respected, and not those of others? What gives you the right to preach to anther poster who is asking very valid questions? You are in no position to make life and death decisions for others, and that is exactly what abortion is.

          You are so offended that one even mentions abortion after delivery, but that is exactly how a partial birth abortion works....hence the term partial birth.

          I dont care what lies you tell yourself to go to sleep at night.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by my4cents (July 20, 2009 9:33 pm ET)
            1  
            In fact, it theoretically impossible to have an abortion any time after delivery.

            People who can type are literate. People who type just because they can are fools.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pointofview (July 20, 2009 9:38 pm ET)
              1 1
              Hence the term partial birth......thats how a partial birth abortion works. Part of the baby is delivered, and then the abortion occurs.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by my4cents (July 20, 2009 9:48 pm ET)
                1  
                So, according to you, partial birth (abortion) = abortion after 'delivery'?
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Brabantio (July 20, 2009 11:44 pm ET)
                2  
                Do you have an example of a "partial birth" abortion taking place three days after birth?

                Without an answer to that, I eagerly await your clarification for the phrase "valid questions".
                Report Abuse
          • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (July 20, 2009 10:12 pm ET)
            6  
            Why is it that your view you needs to be the one respected, and not those of others? What gives you the right to preach to anther poster who is asking very valid questions? You are in no position to make life and death decisions for others, and that is exactly what abortion is.


            LOL I notice your happy little butt didn't bother to answer the question either!

            Good grief POV!!! NO ONE has EVER had an abortion AFTER a baby is born! I know that and you should know it. It was a flat out stupid question so I'm not sure why you're trying to defend it or link it to what you call 'partial birth abortion' which is not even a medical term. Everyone knows that killing a 3 day old child is called murder and you will go to prison.


            WHY is this sooo freaking hard for you to comprehend?

            Someone choosing abortion should have absolutely NOTHING to do with YOU UNLESS it's your wife or girlfriend. It's a personal decision. Get it? Only YOU and YOUR family get to make the decision, NO ONE else!

            Try living in the REAL world where families make hard, painful, difficult decisions about life and death EACH and EVERY day!! They don't need MY opinion and they d*mn well don't need yours either.

            And POV, really, it's extremely juvenile to harp on the 'old folks' crap. One day, IF you're lucky, you might live to be old too. By them I can only hope you've matured enough to realize how blessed you are to get old.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Leftym0m79 (July 20, 2009 10:40 pm ET)
            1 1
            I ask again...But do you also expect a woman to carry a dead baby to term? Or for that matter follow through with the pregnancy if it endangered her own life? What about ectopic pregnancies? You have your beliefs we have ours, the only difference is that we understand that the word choice, means just that, the freedom to choose whether or not to terminate the pregnancy, keep it and/or give it up for adoption.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (July 20, 2009 11:53 pm ET)
            1  
            If you want to get technical about it, I think you would say that it's an abortion during delivery. After delivery would mean that the birth was completed. Besides, as it is so much fun to point out, the context here is days after delivery, not seconds.

            What you should realize is that the suggestion that anyone would support killing a three day-old baby is incredibly offensive. It's sort of like saying "the only reason you voted against Obama is you want the black race to be put back into slavery". It's just that ridiculously stupid and inflammatory. Do you understand?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pointofview (July 21, 2009 8:17 am ET)
                1
              And that is EXACTLY the point I am making Brabanito. The abortion may be seconds after birth, it may be during birth. But then again, it may be a day before birth, a week, or a month. How can anyone say that this second it is not a human life, but the next second it is. Thats my point. Lefty mom can not be serious about making a woman carry a dead baby to term. The baby has died. It happens, and it is tragic. Thats why I have said over and over that life begins a conception, and it is not up to us to decide when to end it.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Brabantio (July 21, 2009 10:37 am ET)
                2  
                You weren't responding to Leftymom there. You were talking to Pearlene.

                Let's examine your logic here. How is it that a 19 year-old can't legally have sex with a 17 year-old, but he could with an 18 year-old? What if it's a few minutes before midnight on the day before her 18th birthday? It's illegal, while a few minutes later it would be legal.

                By that logic, sex is illegal completely. No matter where you move the line, there's still a line where there's an hour, a minute, a second's worth of difference. 21st birthday? Same situation. 30th? The line remains.

                The same concept applies here. You can go backwards from the second-trimester mark and say "well today it's a legal entity, but yesterday it wasn't?" You can take that all the way back to conception, but it's logically bereft. You can have arbitrary distinctions of time without any questions as to their legitimacy.

                Besides, the whole point behind "partial-birth abortion" is that it's a medical concern. It doesn't make any sense to talk about killing a baby after it's born, since any medical issue would have been resolved by then.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by pointofview (July 21, 2009 11:19 am ET)
                    1
                  The difference in what you have presented, and the abortion question is strong however. While a law may be broken by drinking 5 mins before your birthday, a life is not lost.

                  It is the dishonesty of many on the pro choice side that is a problem. There is a simple refusal to acknowledge that any abortion takes a life. I know these are touch cases with personal consequences for the families involved. But tough situations do not in and of themselves justify killing a baby. It is really that simple.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by vhw28672478 (July 21, 2009 11:22 am ET)
                    1  
                    you are wrong pro life are terrorist
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by Brabantio (July 21, 2009 11:28 am ET)
                    1  
                    I didn't mention drinking. Legally, what I'm talking about would be rape.

                    Your definition of "life" and "baby" relies on your personal perspective. There's nothing objective there, so there's nothing by which to assert control over everyone. It would be like "my religion says this, so it should be a law that affects all of you". That's not how it works. There simply is no secular argument against abortion. Society has the right to regulate life. You can have your opinion all day long that it's wrong to "kill a baby", but there is no argument that justifies forcing that view on society as a whole.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (July 21, 2009 7:30 pm ET)
                         
                      Brab, I made the same mistake recently. Tried to make an analogy that would help Pointy see the logic outside of the emotional effects of his ideology, and he got hung up on the irrelevant details of the analogy.

                      Analogies work to clarify and simplify issues for most people. Those who have trouble with the abstract get confused by them, thinking the subject has been changed.
                      Report Abuse
              • Author by Ruby (July 21, 2009 2:22 pm ET)
                1  
                POV, your argument does exactly the same thing. You are also making the statement that at this second, it is not a human life, but the next second it is (you believe life begins at conception). What gives you the authority to make that call but yet, no one else could possible say something different?

                Additionally, I inquired above about when exactly you think "conception" is. Conception is a process.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (July 21, 2009 7:22 pm ET)
            1  
            Wow pearl, you old folks get real touchy when asked a simple question. (Pointlessview)

            Yeah, she should just dodge them and move on to a new line of BS like you do. Are you a vegetarian, POinty?
            Report Abuse
        • Author by johnrod10 (July 21, 2009 7:28 am ET)
            2
          What the mother wants is inconsequential. Once a child is conceived, there is no valid reason to kill him/her.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (July 21, 2009 8:00 am ET)
            1  
            That rather broad statement would seem to include rape, incest and the health of the mother.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (July 21, 2009 7:31 pm ET)
                 
              It also begs the question that a fertilized egg is a child. Two failures in one sentence, pretty impressive.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by johnrod10 (July 22, 2009 6:53 am ET)
                 
              It includes all 3.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Brabantio (July 22, 2009 7:55 am ET)
                   
                So even the health of the mother is supposed to play second fiddle to the fetus? Really?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by johnrod10 (July 22, 2009 12:06 pm ET)
                     
                  Yes
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by johnrod10 (July 22, 2009 12:15 pm ET)
                       
                    Its not a question of fiddles. The question is this: Do we believe what the Declaration of Independence says?

                    "We hold these truths to be self evident, that ALL men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights".

                    In the case of a mother's health, every effort should be made to save both the mother and the child.
                    Now, do you believe that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with these rights? Or do you believe that these rights only belong to the children that were lucky enough to have parents that wanted them?
                    Report Abuse
    • Author by coldteablues19577325 (July 20, 2009 7:23 pm ET)
      3  
      And here's what I don't understand. How is it fair to take away choice? At this time, women have the right to choose (a VERY good thing) to either abort or give birth. If the pro-lifers have their way, that choice will be removed which I certainly don't view as good thing!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by oscar the grouch (July 20, 2009 8:25 pm ET)
        1 1
        And sometimes when we make choices, we have to pay for them, whether it be a monetary amount or some other way.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by my4cents (July 20, 2009 9:37 pm ET)
          1  
          I agree.
          The cost a woman pays for aborting is a lot more than one can imagine.
          The monetary amount that the woman, her family, or the government pays is a mere pittance.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (July 20, 2009 7:58 pm ET)
      2  
      IF the health care bill will cover federally funded abortions, what other elective procedures will be covered?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (July 20, 2009 8:05 pm ET)
        1  
        Abortions are elective in the same vein as other elective procedures. Carying a fetus to term has a lot of risks for the mother that having a mole on your face or a strange nose do not.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (July 20, 2009 8:18 pm ET)
          1  
          It's supposed to be "aren't in the same vein". :(
          Report Abuse
          • Author by oscar the grouch (July 20, 2009 8:23 pm ET)
            1 1
            Depending on the strange nose or location of the mole, it might have a bad effect on one's self-esteem. A lot of women go through the risks of carrying a "fetus" to term everyday and survive, so why is it an un-necessary risk. I see some person or group pushing the issue in the future at some cost to the system.
            (Good to see you are still visiting the site, even though your posts are very infrequent).
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (July 21, 2009 12:59 am ET)
                 
              A lot of women go through the risks of carrying a "fetus" to term everyday and survive, so why is it an un-necessary risk.
              Some people have cancer, meditate, and get better. So what? Some people drive head on into a bridge abutment at 60 MPH and live. Pregnancy and conditions that bring rise to other elective procedures are not equivalent.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by LIBERTY OR DEATH (July 20, 2009 11:53 pm ET)
        3
      Every successful abortion kills an unborn entity, a full-fledged member of the human community.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (July 21, 2009 10:44 am ET)
        1  
        That's pretty odd. A woman can get an abortion without anyone in their family knowing about it. They don't have to know that she was ever even pregnant. How can a fetus be a "full-fledged member of the human community" if their absence isn't recognized by anyone besides the woman?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (July 21, 2009 12:47 pm ET)
           
        Every successful abortion kills an unborn entity, a full-fledged member of the human community.
        Um...no. Next.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Korsa (July 21, 2009 5:55 am ET)
      1  
      That was...I don't know, to me that was pretty pathetic. Pretty low-class, if you ask me. At the very least, if they were going to do that, they could've also had some ads aired there for the pro-choice supporters. But, that would be too fair wouldn't it?

      Is this just another way to "get back" at the Democrats? It seems like the mainstream media is often trying to not only punish President Obama, but the Democrats especially, for electing him into office.

      Has something like this ever happened on mainstream media before?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hatmaker510 (July 21, 2009 7:09 pm ET)
         
      Abortion is a legal medical procedure. It is not up to politicians to decide what is or is not health care - especially considering they would be making restrictive laws based solely on their opinion and religious beliefs. Consider this: If politicians are given that power and they exclude abortion today, what will they they decide to exclude next? How do you know it won't affect you?
      Exactly how is it right for the religious beliefs of some to be used to create laws that affect all?
      I am so sick of anti-choicers trying to shove their opinions/beliefs onto women - including perfect strangers! It is not your decision to turn women into incubators against their will. Apparently this can't be said enough: Abortion is a legal medical procedure between a woman and her doctor. It is her decision (and her partner if she chooses) to carry a pregnancy to term or not. Pay more attention to how you live your live and stop trying to control other people! How many babies have you adopted? What are you doing to help real babies once they are born?
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.