O'Donnell asked why not let McCaskill give a "red meat" speech at the DNC -- McCaskill did, but MSNBC didn't cover
SUMMARY: Norah O'Donnell asked Mike Barnicle, regarding the Democratic National Convention, "[W]hy not position a senator, like Claire McCaskill, up there for five minutes and let her throw some red meat out to the crowd?" In fact, McCaskill did speak on the first night of the convention and did repeatedly criticize Sen. John McCain and President Bush, but MSNBC didn't air her speech during its live coverage.
During MSNBC's August 26 coverage of the Democratic National Convention, NBC News chief Washington correspondent Norah O'Donnell asserted that during the upcoming Republican National Convention, "[t]he Republicans ... are going to use from Day One through Day Four to hammer [Sen.] Barack Obama" and asked MSNBC political analyst Mike Barnicle of the first night of the Democratic National Convention, "[W]hy not position a senator, like Claire McCaskill [D-MO], up there for five minutes and let her throw some red meat out to the crowd?" In fact, McCaskill did speak on the first night of the Democratic National Convention, and in that speech, McCaskill repeatedly criticized both Sen. John McCain and President Bush. However, MSNBC did not air the speech during its live coverage of the convention.
During her speech, McCaskill asserted:
For eight years we have watched our government take care of the powerful, the few and the extremely wealthy. We have seen our dream put at risk by George Bush's Washington. John McCain is running for four more years of the same old politics and exact same failed policies that we had under George Bush. They did tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, they're doing everything Big Oil asks for, and look where we are.
Come on, America. Let's call on our common sense and stay focused on what's important. We cannot choose that path again. That's a risk the American people cannot afford to take. I have seen Barack Obama in the Senate, and I've been by his side on the campaign trail. I know he will bring the change we need in Washington.
I saw him take on both parties to help pass the farthest-reaching ethics reform since Watergate. That's the change we need. I saw him run a campaign that hasn't taken a dime from federal lobbyists and PACs. That's the change we need. I know that this son of a single mom will stand up for the dreams of our daughters. And I know that John McCain won't.
There is only one candidate in this race who has fought for equal pay for equal work by America's women. That candidate is Barack Obama. There is only one candidate offering real tax relief for the middle class, health care that is affordable and accessible and protection of Social Security today, tomorrow and forever. That candidate is Barack Obama.
It all depends on how clearly you see America -- how clearly you see the best of America. John McCain has been in Washington for almost 30 years. Maybe that's why he has a campaign run by Washington lobbyists and thinks the fundamentals of the economy are strong. In Missouri we have a ringside seat to the real America, and I can assure you it looks much different.
From the 7 p.m. hour of MSNBC's coverage of the Democratic National Convention on August 26:
O'DONNELL: The Republicans, Mike, are going to use from Day One through Day Four to hammer Barack Obama.
BARNICLE: Oh, I'm sure they will, but I -- you know, I very rarely disagree with James Carville, but I do disagree with him on this issue for a couple of reasons.
First of all, I don't think that on the emotion of last night, with Ted Kennedy appearing and Michelle Obama appearing for a specific reason, to introduce herself to the country, you can't interrupt that kind of emotional flow with, "By the way, John McCain's a bad guy."
O'DONNELL: Well, why not position a senator, like Claire McCaskill, up there for five minutes and let her throw some red meat out to the crowd?
BARNICLE: Let me ask you this or let me state what I'm about to --
O'DONNELL: No, no. I'm leading the panel.
BARNICLE: Let me ask you this, because you have a specific expertise in my probably largely minority view here of what happened last night. Something happened last night that I think down the road will be more important than Ted Kennedy's speech, more important than Mrs. Obama's speech, perhaps even more important than Barack Obama's speech. And it's when one little girl said, "Hi, Daddy." And it humanized him, like that. Boom.















If its gone south, then they are not the democrats this country needs.
You telling me that a deomcrat will elect another republican term so we can trash this country even more?
I don't think so, and I think any dem worth his salt will see that what Hillary is saying is the correct thing to do.
Swallow your pride, Obama won the primary....go to the booths on election day and VOTE for OBAMA.
You go vote for mccain, and you are gonna get what you asked for, more of the same.
O'Donnell has got to be the dimmest bulb in the pack over there.
The funniest moment tonight, though, belongs to Andrea Mitchell, who tried to urge a 79 year-old Hillary supporter that maybe she was not going to support Obama. She kept asking her why she wasn't supporting him, and the woman kept answering back to her that she was!
Anyone else notice last night how Olbermann smacked down Matthews with a hand gesture, right after he stepped on Luke Russert's opening lines?
Let's see if Larry King going to host another " opposition party " representavives during the republican convention .
NOpe. Ol' Larry will be on vacation all next week, and his favorite guest host Pat Sajak will have just one guest - Jeff Christie. (I just made that up, but it would not surprise me one bit.)
King said last night that he will have Dems on hand to respond to the Repugs. The question now is, will they be pit bulls or lap dogs?
Norah, you blonde roots are beginning to show.
Sorry about that but my keyboard has not been equipped with the Politically Correct function. So don't blame me.
"Norah, you blonde roots are beginning to show. "
Lay offa Norah, lads. She and Tweety gave great comic relief, a coupla months ago, when they took Hillary to task for her "cackle." The two of them were just one shy of a gaggle. Also, (PC ALERT:) you've got to admit, she's easy on the orbs.
O'DONNELL ABU!
We recorded the whole thing on CNN and were specifically waiting to hear Claire speak. We missed it, twice! I went through the recording again and noticed her speaking in the background while the CNN pundits were chattering ad nauseam about how the Democrats weren't attacking enough and didn't have a message. I was so irritated.
Claire McCaskill rarely speaks (she is too busy working) and she is a great voice for the party. It was really frustrating. We didn't record Fox (for obvious reasons), but I would be willing to guess they were busy trying to split the party by goading the Clinton supporters.
Please Digg, Buzz or otherwise pass this story along and blog and comment about this problem all over the place.
Wow. These people are astoundingly poor at their jobs.
August 27, 2008 --
ANIMOSITY among MSNBC anchors has reached a mile-high peak at the Democratic National Convention in Denver, with on-air squabbling between such big egos as Joe Scarborough, Keith Olbermann, Chris Matthews and David Shuster.
Scarborough, who served in Congress as a Republican representative from Florida, seems to be particularly touchy being the only host who isn't openly pro-Democratic.
Yesterday, after Shuster referred to "your party, the Republican Party," Scarborough went off, sparking a seven-minute exchange.
"I will let you know that 'my party,' my party loathes me much more than your party, the Democratic Party, loathes me," Scarborough seethed. "What about your party? What's your party, David Shuster? David, what's your party?"
"I have no party. I'm a complete independent," Shuster replied.
"Oh, I feel so comforted by the fact that you're independent. I bet everyone at MSNBC has 'independent' on their voting cards," said Scarborough.
Scarborough declined to talk to Page Six, but sources say he and NBC anchor Tom Brokaw disagree with MSNBC's decision to position itself as the channel for George W. Bush-haters.
At a forum on Sunday, when Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell called MSNBC "the official network of the Obama campaign," Brokaw said, "I think Keith has gone too far. I think Chris has gone too far."
Insiders say Olbermann is pushing to have Brokaw banned from the network and is also refusing to have centrist Time magazine columnist Mike Murphy on his show.
"The idea of anyone trying to ban Tom Brokaw is ludicrous," said one MSNBC-er. Brokaw was on MSNBC for an hour yesterday afternoon. Murphy, who was bumped from Olbermann's show on Monday night, told us, "They told me technical problems and I have no reason not to believe them."
source ny post
Really? Using Page 6 of the NY Post as a source?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uqk3NlOry7g
They've got some experience with making crap up about Olbermann et al. "Keith apparently has threatened to quit if he doesn't get the [Meet the Press] job."
At this point, the only thing missing from the MSNBC set near Union Station in Denver is a pig's head mounted on a stick. Never in the history of television has a news network gone into meltdown on the sort of grand scale that has been on display this week at NBC News. Things have gone from bad to worse during MSNBC's coverage of the Democratic National Convention in Denver - and the week is only half over. With the meek and ineffectual Brian Williams, Tom Brokaw, Andrea Mitchell and Chuck Todd busying themselves with coverage over at the big network, the biguns and littleuns at MSNBC have divided into two warring camps. Keith Olbermann now leads a savage band of far-left kooks posing as reporters and news analysts (David Shuster, Rachel Maddow, etc.) while a disorganized rabble of establishment types (Chris Matthews, Joe Scarborough, etc.) scrambling to stave off defections to Olbermann's tribe and protect their own hides. Krazy Keith seems perfectly prepared to burn the whole set down rather than let one dissenting voice make air to criticize or challenge the Obama Informercial that Olbermann is attempting to orchestrate. You can find the video clips on this site and all over the internet as Olbermann interrupts Scarborough, Scarborough mocks Keith on his morning show, Olbermann accuses Matthews of stealing other people's ideas, Matthews snarls at Olbermann, Shuster goes after Joe and so the world turns on the soap opera that has become "Your Place for Pettiness". Is this the honoring of Tim Russert's memory that NBC executives like Jeff Zucker, Steve Capus and Phil Griffin had in mind for this year's convention. Class acts all. Maybe for "Election Night 2008", Keith can pound Matthews over the head with a white board while shouting "Florida, Florida, Florida!"
www.olbermannwatch.com
I tried watching on the cable news channels, and it was unwatchable. It was nothing but pundits takes on what they felt the speeches REALLY said.
I switched to watching CSPAN, and their coverage has been great. It's nice to actually hear the speeches instead of seeing the same pundits we always see on cable news giving us their spin.
We've been watching on Cspan - they're carrying everything except the network chatter. I'm a huge MSNBC fan, but we wanted to see the speeches and many of them have been really good. The network anchors just don't seem to be able to shut up for 5 minutes, none of them!