About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN, WSJ reported on McCain's Al Qaeda question without noting error

April 09, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: CNN's The Situation Room and a Wall Street Journal article both noted that, during a Senate hearing, Sen. John McCain asked Gen. David H. Petraeus about whether Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQ-I) is a "major threat," without also noting that McCain went on to ask of Al Qaeda in Iraq: "Certainly not an obscure sect of -- of the Shiites all -- overall?" In fact, AQ-I is a Sunni Muslim, not Shiite, group.

77 Comments

The April 8 edition of CNN's The Situation Room and an April 9 Wall Street Journal article both noted that in an April 8 Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Sen. John McCain asked Multinational Force-Iraq Commanding Gen. David H. Petraeus about how much of a threat Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQ-I) poses, without also noting that McCain went on to ask of AQ-I: "Certainly not an obscure sect of -- of the Shiites all -- overall?" In fact, AQ-I is a Sunni Muslim, not Shiite, group. By contrast, an April 9 New York Times article noted that "Mr. McCain did seem to get momentarily tangled over Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia. ... Senator McCain was embarrassed last month when, on a trip to Jordan, he stated several times that the Iranians were training Iraqi Qaeda operatives in Iran and then sending them back into Iraq. After one of his traveling companions, Mr. [Sen. Joseph I.] Lieberman [I-CT], corrected him, Mr. McCain explained that he had meant to say that the Iranians, who are Shiites, were training other extremists."

During the hearing, McCain asked Petraeus: "Do you still view al Qaeda in Iraq as a major threat?" Petraeus replied: "It is still a major threat, though it is certainly not as major a threat as it was, say, 15 months ago." McCain then asked "Certainly not an obscure sect of -- of the Shiites all -- overall --" prompting Petraeus to reply "No," as McCain went on to finish his question: "or Sunnis or anybody else?"

On the April 8 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, congressional correspondent Dana Bash said that McCain "led the witness, too, especially to make the crux of his argument for staying in Iraq." Bash then aired a video clip of the hearing in which McCain's comments were cropped, stopping after the "not" in McCain's follow-up question, "Certainly not an obscure sect of -- of the Shiites all -- overall --." Rather than noting McCain's error, Bash said, "Now, McCain also got some help from his two Senate wingmen on this issue, Joe Lieberman and Lindsey Graham [R-SC]."

This is not the first time CNN has cropped video in a manner that obscures a McCain error about Al Qaeda. As Media Matters for America noted, on the March 18 Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer reported on McCain's false claim that Iranian operatives are "taking Al Qaeda into Iran, training them and sending them back," and falsely asserted that McCain "quickly corrected [it] after some prodding from his Senate colleague, Joe Lieberman." During the report Blitzer aired a spliced video of McCain's misstatement immediately followed by McCain correcting himself. The misleading video gave no indication that during the press conference, McCain twice falsely claimed that Iranian operatives are training members of Al Qaeda or that time elapsed between both misstatements and McCain's correction, prompted by Lieberman.

The April 9 Wall Street Journal article headlined "Candidates Stay on Message At Iraq-War Hearings" referenced the McCain-Petraeus exchange about AQ-I without noting McCain's error: "Tuesday, Sen. McCain sought to bolster his view of the threat posed by the group, and he asked Gen. Petreaus [sic] about it. Gen. Petraeus said the group is 'still a major threat' but one less significant than it was a year ago."

From the 9 a.m. ET hour of the April 8 edition of CNN Newsroom:

McCAIN: There are numerous threats to security in Iraq and the future of Iraq. Do you still view Al Qaeda in Iraq as a major threat?

PETRAEUS: It is still a major threat, though it is certainly not as major a threat as it was, say, 15 months ago.

McCAIN: Certainly not an obscure sect of -- of the Shiites all -- overall --

PETRAEUS: No. No, sir.

McCAIN: -- or Sunnis or anybody else then? Al Qaeda continues to try to assert themselves in Mosul, is that correct?

PETRAEUS: It is, senator. As you saw on the chart, the area of operation of Al Qaeda has been greatly reduced in terms of controlling areas that it controlled as little as a year and a half ago. But clearly, Mosul and Ninawa province are areas that Al Qaeda is very much trying to hold on to. All roads lead through the traditional capital of the north.

McCAIN: They continue to be a significant threat?

PETRAEUS: They do. Yes, sir.

From the April 8 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

[video clip]

BASH: On the trail, McCain regularly applauds General Petraeus.

McCAIN: Thank God for General Petraeus, one of the great generals in American history.

BASH: But as rosy an Iraq picture McCain hopes to paint, he's trying to gain credibility with war-weary voters by acknowledging problems.

McCAIN: The thousand Iraqi army and police deserted or underperformed.

BASH: He gently questioned Petraeus about Iraqi military defections during battle in Basra.

McCAIN: Suffice to say it was a disappointment.

PETRAEUS: It was, although it's -- it is not over yet, senator.

BASH: He led the witness, too, especially to make the crux of his argument for staying in Iraq.

McCAIN: Do you still view Al Qaeda in Iraq as a major threat?

PETRAEUS: It is still a major threat, though it is certainly not as major a threat as it was, say, 15 months ago.

McCAIN: Certainly not.

[end video clip]

BASH: Now, McCain also got some help from his two Senate wingmen on this issue, Joe Lieberman [I-CT] and Lindsey Graham [R-SC]. They both used their question time, Wolf, with General Petraeus to really scold Democrats for not acknowledging progress in Iraq. But, you know, Wolf, that's also an argument that Senator McCain admits is harder to make as violence is on the upswing in Iraq.

WOLF BLITZER (anchor): What a day. And it's going to continue tomorrow as well.

From the April 9 Wall Street Journal article:

Both Democrats jumped on Sen. McCain's remarks praising the current strategy and condemning an early exit. The Arizona senator used some of his harshest criticism to date about proponents of early withdrawal, saying withdrawal now would "constitute a failure of political and moral leadership."

"I fundamentally disagree," Sen. Clinton said several hours later, calling it "irresponsible to continue the policy that has not produced results."

Among the common themes were questions about al Qaeda in Iraq. The issue of the terrorist group's role arose on the campaign trial in February. Tuesday, Sen. McCain sought to bolster his view of the threat posed by the group, and he asked Gen. Petreaus about it. Gen. Petraeus said the group is "still a major threat" but one less significant than it was a year ago.

Sen. Obama, speaking later in a different hearing, revisited the topic with a question about the U.S. definition of success in Iraq. He asked what the likelihood would be that al Qaeda in Iraq could "reconstitute itself" at a future date, perhaps after the U.S. had withdrawn. Gen. Petraeus responded that it was possible.

Sen Obama said, "It's fair to say that we're not going to completely eliminate al traces of al Qaeda in Iraq. That can't be our definition of success."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by thomp.steve9098 (April 09, 2008 2:01 pm ET)
         
      disgraceful reporting, the WSJ also failed to note Obama's confusing iraq with iran. the misinformation is diabolical
      Report Abuse
      • Author by therick (April 09, 2008 2:09 pm ET)
           
        It is most certainly "diabolical."  They are paid to REPORT FACTS, not just the ones they want us to hear/see.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by TadekKorn (April 10, 2008 1:17 am ET)
             
          Now that Rupert Murdoch owns the WSJ, its reporters need no longer be constrained by factual data.  It is now part of the great FOX (or FAUX or FOU) netwwork, a propaganda tool of the Republican Party.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Governor (April 09, 2008 2:22 pm ET)
           
        Great use of misplaced sarcasm there.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jeter2 (April 09, 2008 2:22 pm ET)
             
          Why is it misplaced?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by thomp.steve9098 (April 09, 2008 2:26 pm ET)
               
            duh, Jeters. It's misplaced because when Obama makes an error it's really no big deal. Just a run-of-the-mill mistake that anyone can make. But when Mccain makes a similar error, it beckons the onslaught of dementia
            Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (April 09, 2008 2:27 pm ET)
                 
              Well said Steve.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by BillJ-MN (April 09, 2008 2:39 pm ET)
                   
                Don't you think there's some added significance when McCain keeps making the same errors over and over?  Personally, I'd think that would be newsworthy about any presidential candidate.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by thomp.steve9098 (April 09, 2008 2:46 pm ET)
                     
                  If I thought that he didn't know the difference between shiite and sunni, and to which sect al qaeda belongs, then sure I'd be concerned.  However, I really don't think his mind's going, at least not yet. I think it's one of those things where his mouth is ahead of his brain.  When I speak, I often say "irregardless."  I know that's not a word, and never would put it on paper when writing something for work, but my tongue simply gets twisted and out it comes.  However, when it matters, as when I'm with clients, or more importantly, with the bosses, I'm more careful and don't say it.  I know, weak analogy, but best I could come up right now.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by BillJ-MN (April 09, 2008 2:58 pm ET)
                       

                    I'm not assuming senility (but I'm not disregarding the idea, either) but I think when he keeps making the same fundamental errors on issues on which he should be knowledgeable, I get concerned that he either doesn't know the facts or is indifferent to them.  One or two slips of the tongue are very excusable.  I'm getting the impression that McCain's erroneous statements are beyond that.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by thomp.steve9098 (April 09, 2008 3:04 pm ET)
                         
                      actually Bill, my concerns are a little different but for similar reasons. I think he does no the facts, presently. However, he is getting up there in years and who the hell knows for sure whether he's losing, or will soon lose, his marbles a little. It happens to everyone. But like I said before, I don't believe his mistatements are anything other mixing up a few letters, and think his lengthy experience in foreign affairs counts in his favor, not just politically.  
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by mary59 (April 09, 2008 11:45 pm ET)
                           
                        This seems doubtful since he said several times that "Al Quaeda" fighters were getting training in Iran then going back into Iraq. He does not seem to know that Al Quaeda is a sunni sect that hates Iran (Shia)
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by achrispage6992 (April 09, 2008 2:59 pm ET)
                       
                    I am willing to give the benefit of the doubt to McCain right now, but I have to admit, the prior times this "gaffe" occurred they were fairly pronounced. He either lets his brain get out in front of his mouth like you say, he doesn't really know, or he is simply trying to persuade us that there all bad over there and it is too time consuming to get it right not to mention unecessary. If these "gaffes" go on without end, I think we all need to eliminate the reason you mentioned in favor of the fact he doesn't know or doesn't care.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by BillJ-MN (April 09, 2008 3:01 pm ET)
                         
                      I considered the possibilities of lack of knowledge or lack of concern.  I guess I didn't give consideration to the possibility he's deliberately creating a false impression.  I probably should at least acknowledge the possibility, but I'd hate to think it were true.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by achrispage6992 (April 09, 2008 3:07 pm ET)
                           
                        I'd hate to think that as well, but a fairly good argument could be made that our present renter of the White House has done just that.  
                        Report Abuse
                • Author by tommy (April 09, 2008 2:48 pm ET)
                     
                  I am far less concerned with word gaffes or stumbling over specifics than I am about candidates who out and out deceive and lie.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Governor (April 09, 2008 2:53 pm ET)
                       
                    And I think it’s important to really know the people you’d like to take military action against.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by BillJ-MN (April 09, 2008 2:59 pm ET)
                       
                    You're creating an either/or situation that I don't believe applies.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by tommy (April 09, 2008 3:14 pm ET)
                         
                      I am not saying either/or at all.  I simply said where my priorities lie as it relates to what candidates say, either intentionally or not.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Governor (April 09, 2008 3:19 pm ET)
                           
                        The current president proves that words gaffs, misspeak and lies are an indistinguishable quagmire.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by BillJ-MN (April 09, 2008 3:28 pm ET)
                           
                        I guess then that your preference is immaterial to the current discussion.  In the absence of that either/or scenario there's no reason not to evaluate McCain's repeatedly making the same errors on its own merits.  I think that's exactly what I was doing.
                        Report Abuse
            • Author by jeter2 (April 09, 2008 2:30 pm ET)
                 

              Thomp,

              I was pulling Gov's chain. He spends half his time asking Why? Why? Why?...you know like a six year old.

              I thought your post was spot on.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by thomp.steve9098 (April 09, 2008 2:32 pm ET)
                   
                I gotcha Jeters. I'm just trying to make Gov think I'm funny, but no luck so far.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Governor (April 09, 2008 2:35 pm ET)
                     
                  I have an affliction, I can only laugh when an elderly man causes a mushroom cloud over a foreign land.  Maybe the Media will help me laugh sometime soon.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by tommy (April 09, 2008 2:41 pm ET)
                   
                J, LOL!  You nailed that summary of Gov's role here.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Governor (April 09, 2008 3:12 pm ET)
                     

                  Hey, Tommy:

                   

                  http://www.theonion.com/content/node/36890

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by tommy (April 09, 2008 3:16 pm ET)
                       

                    Gov, The other day you told me to f&*k off.  Now you link to a cartoon bashing genitals.

                    And we are to take you serious here?  I just can't, sorry. 

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Governor (April 09, 2008 3:21 pm ET)
                         
                      "We"?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by tommy (April 09, 2008 3:27 pm ET)
                           
                        Ok, me.  If others want to do so, they are more than welcome.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Governor (April 09, 2008 3:29 pm ET)
                             
                          That's a relief.  Thanks for calling of your goons.
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by achrispage6992 (April 09, 2008 4:29 pm ET)
                             
                          I'd watch it Tommy, the linking to that cartoon could be seen as an invitation. Perhaps he really likes you, kind of like when as kids the little boy insults the cute girl, pulls her hair, etc.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by tommy (April 09, 2008 4:42 pm ET)
                               
                            Chris, Do you really think so?  (blush)  I should be so lucky, the Governor has an unrequited crush on me.  Oh my.....
                            Report Abuse
            • Author by Governor (April 09, 2008 2:31 pm ET)
                 
              The Media's job is to report facts and record truth.  They failed here, they fail often.  I'm not one to say 'oh well, ha ha, at least they do it all over the place.' 
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Governor (April 09, 2008 2:27 pm ET)
               
            Because I don't think it's funny.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (April 09, 2008 2:06 pm ET)
         
      "One of the great generals in American history".

      Working for one of the greatest presidents in American history.

      And hopefully no one will take me for one of those hateful ageists, but that's saying a lot since John rode with William Tecumseh Sherman when he was a young man.

      You've got to love these people.

      First they said that since the surge was working so well and things have settled down, we can't withdrawal troops.

      Now that things might flare up again, we can't withdrawal troops.

      Makes sense to me.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (April 09, 2008 2:08 pm ET)
           
        We just figured out the difference between Sunni and Shiite. We can't pull out now!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by therick (April 09, 2008 2:13 pm ET)
             

          Sunni, Shiite--both begin with an S,  Iraq, Iran--Both begin with an I,  Obama, Osama, hell there's only one letter difference.

          Geez, no wonder these people are so confused.

           

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jeter2 (April 09, 2008 2:22 pm ET)
               

            Good point.

            Hey my name is Mike. One of our son's names is Matt. My wife [as well as others] quite often calls me Matt I mean Mike or Mike-Matt or Matt-Mike.

            She does the same to our son.

            Obviously both McCain & Obama know what they meant. Both are gaffes, nothing more.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by worrierking (April 09, 2008 2:44 pm ET)
                 
              I've got three brothers and three sons. My mother used to go through the list until she got to my name and I find I'm doing it to my sons too.

              I do get my daughters name right most of the time on the first try.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jeter2 (April 09, 2008 2:56 pm ET)
                   

                I hear ya King, I mix up the names of our 3 sons & their names don't even begin with the same letter. Hell these days I forget more names than I remember ;-)

                The important thing is not to call your wife by the wrong name...at the wrong time :-O

                Report Abuse
    • Author by notanotherconservative2254 (April 09, 2008 2:25 pm ET)
         

      As an Obama supporter, I am worried that these hearing will remind the country that McCain wore the uniform, served his country with honor and distinction, and is proud to be an American.

       

      These are not great issues for my affirmative action candidate, Obama.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by BillJ-MN (April 09, 2008 2:32 pm ET)
           
        Don't worry NAC, when we get around to one-on-one campaigning and the debates, the intellectual power that placed McCain in the bottom 1% of his class at Annapolis will become obvious and people will realize that his military service ranks pretty low as a qualification.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by thomp.steve9098 (April 09, 2008 2:34 pm ET)
             
          aaah. bottom 1%, top 1%, we're really splitting hairs now
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dbeden4153 (April 09, 2008 2:50 pm ET)
               
            if 894th out of 899th is the top 1%, all these tax debates have been really, really silly.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by notanotherconservative2254 (April 09, 2008 2:51 pm ET)
             

          Again, the only problem is that people know that McCain is NOT in the  "bottom 1% of his clas" when it comes to being a proud and loyal American. 

          We Obama supporters need to change the subject before we have to confront the fact that Obama has almost zero accomplishments post-graduation.  (After all, this guy had so much time on his hands that he was able to two books - clearly, he needed something to do just to keep himself busy.)

          Go Obama! 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by thomp.steve9098 (April 09, 2008 2:53 pm ET)
               

            I can't believe Obama has yet to give you an advisory role for his campaign. For McCain's sake, I hope you keep your advice to this board alone

            Report Abuse
          • Author by dbeden4153 (April 09, 2008 2:57 pm ET)
               

            NAC, by your logic, McCain hasn't done anything, ever (he's written or co-written 5 books, not to mention contributing to several more.)

            You really need a new shtick, this one is wearing thin. 

            Report Abuse
            • Author by nerzog (April 09, 2008 3:05 pm ET)
                 
              NOTANOTHERTROGLODYTE is, for lack of a better term, a lying GOP troll. Facts will not phase him.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by achrispage6992 (April 09, 2008 3:05 pm ET)
                 
              Not to mention that he is so filled with honor that he deems it necessary to call his wife a horrible name http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/08/new-book-mccain-once-phys_n_95595.html. If true this man really needs some help. There is no excuse for such a thing.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by notanotherconservative2254 (April 09, 2008 3:19 pm ET)
                   

                Cliff Schecter?

                 

                Never heard of him.  Must not be very important.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by BillJ-MN (April 09, 2008 3:30 pm ET)
                     

                  Attack the messenger when you can't attack the message?

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by dbeden4153 (April 09, 2008 3:33 pm ET)
                     

                  ok, now you're officially making stupid arguments.

                  Like I said, OFFICIALLY. 

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Governor (April 09, 2008 3:33 pm ET)
                     
                  Your Obama button fell off.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by achrispage6992 (April 09, 2008 3:40 pm ET)
                     
                  Do you codone such behavior if in fact it happenned? At least be intellectually honest with yourself and admit that if McCain did these things he at least deserves to be taken to task on his character. Are you so blinded by your own partisanship that you won't even acknowledge abhorrent behavior?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by notanotherconservative2254 (April 09, 2008 3:43 pm ET)
                       

                    The only "abhorrent behavior" I can see is when hacks write crazy screeds and partisan hacks cite the crazy screeds AND ACTUALLY THINK NORMAL PEOPLE ARE GOING TO LISTEN TO THEM!!!

                     

                    Oh, and of course, GO OBAMA!!!

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by worrierking (April 09, 2008 3:48 pm ET)
                         
                      As a McCain supporter, I'm willing to give Schecter a pass on this. And I hope that my candidate, John McCain's past history and infidelities don't hurt his chances at the presidency.

                      I'm worried if these things are looked at more closely, Senator Obama's marital commitment to his first and only wife might make my candidate, John McCain look bad because of his treatment of women in the past.

                      Oh, and go MCain!
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by Governor (April 09, 2008 3:54 pm ET)
                         

                      Republican hacks at that:

                       

                      http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/news/the_beat/?p=16

                       

                      Go Crazy!!!

                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by achrispage6992 (April 09, 2008 4:36 pm ET)
                         

                      Are you o.k? Can you answer a question in a cogent manner without taking this interaction to a infantile level? Calm down, and at least try to engage in an adult discussion.

                      Now then, by your answer I assume you feel that if McCain did those things it isn't bad behavior. Do you not see the inherent flaw in that? do you calll our wife those kinds of names? If not would you codone people who do? I don't want some kind of useless name calling argument with you. I'd rather discuss this like adults. Shall we?

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Governor (April 09, 2008 4:39 pm ET)
                           

                        Are you o.k? Can you answer a question in a cogent manner without taking this interaction to a infantile level? Calm down, and at least try to engage in an adult discussion.

                         

                        I hope you realize that you've just replied this to yourself.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by achrispage6992 (April 09, 2008 4:46 pm ET)
                             
                          Gee thanks. I appreciate your insight and I bet my daddy could beat up your daddy.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Governor (April 09, 2008 4:50 pm ET)
                               
                            Sorry, missed the thread chain, that's all.  From your post/s, it was/is unclear who you're commenting at/to.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by achrispage6992 (April 09, 2008 4:52 pm ET)
                                 
                              Damn Govenor, you have really confused me. I posted the same reply to him again. Please stop.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by Governor (April 09, 2008 4:58 pm ET)
                                   
                                The real problem is that NAC's off to the Obama rally and can't reply.
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by achrispage6992 (April 09, 2008 5:08 pm ET)
                                     
                                  I guess. Perhaps he'll stay there or become overwhelmed and try to rush the stage for a hug and he will be taken to the state hospital where he belongs. Then we'll only have to hear from him about one hour each day during his leisure time.
                                  Report Abuse
                        • Author by achrispage6992 (April 09, 2008 4:50 pm ET)
                             
                          You know what I just realized that I did just that and unfortunately I took your post as an somekind of insult. I replied as such and for that I am sorry. I could have swore I replied to NAC. Again, I'm sorry and thanks.
                          Report Abuse
                    • Author by achrispage6992 (April 09, 2008 4:51 pm ET)
                         

                      Are you o.k? Can you answer a question in a cogent manner without taking this interaction to a infantile level? Calm down, and at least try to engage in an adult discussion.

                      Now then, by your answer I assume you feel that if McCain did those things it isn't bad behavior. Do you not see the inherent flaw in that? do you calll our wife those kinds of names? If not would you codone people who do? I don't want some kind of useless name calling argument with you. I'd rather discuss this like adults. Shall we or you can continue down this road of just plain wierdness.

                      Report Abuse
          • Author by BillJ-MN (April 09, 2008 8:36 pm ET)
               

            ...people know that McCain is NOT in the  "bottom 1% of his clas" when it comes to being a proud and loyal American. - NAC

            And yet he still falls short of Obama and Clinton in that category.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (April 09, 2008 4:05 pm ET)
         

      I appreciate that my candidate might have some trouble concerning his infatuation with an alien earth girl, his pencil thin mustash, wardrobe and manner are defintly not mainstream USA. And don't ask him about about green cards.But just look at the way he kicked Mongo into the 31st century. Please give him your support.

      Go Ming!!

      Ankth you. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MoonbatYouBet (April 09, 2008 5:28 pm ET)
         
      McCain is not senile or suffering early onset Alzheimer's or any other such nonsense.  However he is also not making a mistake here.  This routine of continuously trying to put forward the idea that Iraq is just crawling with al-Qaeda, and not just any al-Qaeda, but the exact same one that perpetrated 9/11, is a tactic.  The American public is tired of a seemingly pointless war with no end in sight, but if he can get enough people to believe that it's about terrorism and a real threat to the US he can attempt to dispell that.  This is exactly the same as all that time Bush and Cheney spent creating the image of a connection between Iraq and 9/11 in the run up to the war and in the post-war quagmire. 
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bambo53 (April 10, 2008 3:49 am ET)
         

      Wonderful.

      McCain doesn't know who he's fighting... but he wants to fight & kill somebody... for 100 years?

       I'd rather have health care

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (April 10, 2008 12:25 pm ET)
           

        Bambo, before one of the McCainiacs corrects you, let me; McCain doesn't want our troops to be in Iraq for 100 years, he's just "fine" with it.

        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.