About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

During discussion of McCain "showing off his foreign policy credentials," Matthews panel ignored McCain's Al Qaeda-Iran gaffes

March 23, 2008 4:12 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: While discussing whether Sen. John McCain is "smart to make national security the centerpiece of his campaign," Chris Matthews highlighted McCain's recent Middle East trip and said McCain was "showing off his foreign policy credentials." But at no point did Matthews, or any of his guests, point out that, during his trip, McCain made the admittedly false claim that "Al Qaeda is going back into Iran and receiving training and are coming back into Iraq from Iran."

18 Comments

On the March 23 edition of his NBC-syndicated television show, Chris Matthews introduced a segment on whether Sen. John McCain is "smart to make national security the centerpiece of his campaign," by saying that McCain was recently in the Middle East "showing off his foreign policy credentials." But at no point during the segment -- indeed, during the entire show -- did Matthews, or any of his guests, point out that, during his trip, McCain repeatedly claimed Iran is training Al Qaeda. During a press conference in Amman, Jordan, McCain made the admittedly false claim that "it's common knowledge and has been reported in the media that ... Al Qaeda is going back into Iran and receiving training and are coming back into Iraq from Iran," a misstatement that, Washington Post reporters Cameron W. Barr and Michael D. Shear wrote, "threatened to undermine McCain's argument that his decades of foreign policy experience make him the natural choice to lead a country at war with terrorists." Matthews had teased the segment on McCain earlier in the show, stating, "When we come back: Is the Arizona hawk putting all his eggs in one basket? Is John McCain's unflinching toughness enough to get him to the White House?"

As Media Matters for America documented, McCain previously made the same claim to nationally syndicated radio host Hugh Hewitt during a March 17 interview and did so more than once during the March 18 press conference in Amman. It was only after Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), who travelled with McCain, whispered something in his ear, that McCain corrected himself, saying: "I'm sorry. The Iranians are training extremists, not Al Qaeda." U.S. officials have reportedly claimed Iran is training Shiite militants; Al Qaeda is a predominantly Sunni organization.

During the discussion, Chicago Tribune columnist Clarence Page said: "[W]hile Iraq is maybe problematic depending on how the surge is perceived, national security is something that is a strong suit for McCain. So go with your strength." But the panel -- which also included New York Times correspondent Elisabeth Bumiller, MSNBC chief Washington correspondent Norah O'Donnell, and New York Magazine contributing editor John Heilemann -- never discussed McCain's claims about Al Qaeda.

From the March 23 edition of the NBC-syndicated The Chris Matthews Show:

MATTHEWS: When we come back: Is the Arizona hawk putting all his eggs in one basket? Is John McCain's unflinching toughness enough to get him to the White House?

[...]

MATTHEWS: Welcome back. While the Democrats were still trying to sort things out this week, John McCain was in the Middle East showing off his foreign policy credentials. But he's sounding an awful lot like George Bush. Listen to the two of them, oceans apart, on Wednesday.

BUSH [video clip]: If we were to allow our enemies to prevail in Iraq, the violence that is now declining would accelerate and Iraq would descend into chaos.

McCAIN [video clip]: I believe that if we set a date for withdrawal, you will see chaos and genocide in the region.

MATTHEWS: The similarities haven't been lost on McCain's Democratic rivals. Here's Barack Obama on Thursday.

OBAMA [video clip]: No matter what the costs, no matter what the consequences, John McCain seems determined to carry out a third Bush term.

MATTHEWS: So is Obama onto something? Has he found McCain's Achilles heel? We asked the Matthews Meter, 12 of our regulars: "Assuming conditions in Iraq stay about the same, is McCain smart to make national security the centerpiece of his campaign?"

Our meter split right down the center on this one. Six say McCain's smart to do so, six say he's not. And Clarence and Nora, you're also split. Nora, you say no, he's not smart to make himself sort of a GI Joe candidate.

O'DONNELL: A whopping 76 percent in our latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll said they want a candidate who has policies different than President Bush. This country wants to move on from that and the economy is the issue. McCain needs to be talking about the economy.

MATTHEWS: Clarence, you disagree?

PAGE: Well, yeah, I do. I think the difference between, first of all, Iraq and national security as an issue in the public mind, and that while Iraq is maybe problematic depending on how the surge is perceived, national security is something that is a strong suit for McCain. So go with your strength. He's got to build his base as well as crossover.

MATTHEWS: So is this just a question -- it's what you do with what you've got? You have to do this.

BUMILLER: This is what he believes in. It happens -- this happens to be a case -- and also, he knows he has to talk more about the economy and they're gearing up some big program, but right now, he sounds an awful lot like Bush when he talks about the economy.

MATTHEWS: The cost of the strategy?

HEILEMANN: Well, I just think there's no political upside to talk about this. Everybody in America knows what John McCain's position is on the war, and they all know that he's a hawk generally in terms of foreign policy. How many Americans can name what John McCain's policy is on the mortgage crisis? None. Zero.

MATTHEWS: So, he needs to shift to the economy and separate himself.

HEILEMAN: Absolutely, 100 percent, as soon as possible.

MATTHEWS: OK. I'll be right back with scoops and predictions right out of the notebooks of these top reporters, "Tell me something I don't know!" Be right back.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by jjamele2880 (March 23, 2008 5:17 pm ET)
         

      "Matthews Meter?" Is that something like the "Keith Number" Olbermann pulls on us when discussing polls?  Do these guys have healthy egos or what?

      Of course, it doesn't matter than McCain doesn't get that all extremists are not Al Quaeda, after all, "most Americans don't know the difference between Sunni and Shi'ite."  Most Americans never anticipated the breach of the levys or the use of passenger jets to bring down buildings either.  

      Isn't it great that we don't expect more of our leaders than we do of ourselves or our neighbors or the average crowd down at the local drinking hole?  

      Report Abuse
    • Author by zamfir273114 (March 23, 2008 5:55 pm ET)
         
      I don't care who wins the Presidency so long as it isn't McCain. This man is a mental clone of G.W. Bush. I think if this country is stupid enough to vote for McCain, I will have to give up on hope for any progress as a nation.

      war...what is it good for?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (March 23, 2008 9:14 pm ET)
           

        ZAMFIR, WAR, what are they good for..ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

        You are refering to the new McBush slogan:

                            WAR----We Are Republicans. 

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (March 24, 2008 8:32 am ET)
           

        Never misunderestimate the stupidity of the...

        American electorate. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by zamfir273114 (March 23, 2008 5:58 pm ET)
         
      ...one more thing...

      ...I see the price of gasoline to reach about $9.00/Gallon during McCain's Presidency if indeed he is made President.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (March 23, 2008 8:09 pm ET)
           
        Funny you say that. There are places in California today selling gas at over $5 a gallon.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by steeve (March 23, 2008 9:36 pm ET)
             

          You'd think the healthy competition of the free market would put those $5 places out of business.

          With so many people who pretend to love pure capitalism running the country for decades, it's strange how few industries actually possess the ingredients of capitalism (full information, vigorous competition).

          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (March 23, 2008 10:02 pm ET)
               

            The key word being competition. Apparently this guy who was interviewed on TV doesn't have much in the way of competition where he was located, so he fixed the price and the one other station (which he also owned) followed suite.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by oscar the grouch (March 23, 2008 11:20 pm ET)
           
        And I see the price of fossil fuel approaching $9.00/ gallon if the Ds are elected President and retain majorities in Congress, due to Rangel's plan ofa $.50/gallon/year gas tax over the next decade to "encourage" conservation.  But that's all good, the money will be going to the Government instead of Oil Company shareholders.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 24, 2008 2:14 am ET)
             

          Wait, Oscar, I thought the Dems were pushing that Global Warming hoax to get people off of fossil fuels and implement complete government control of energy.The amount collected from gasoline taxes must be puny compared to this new scam.

          Now I'm confused. Which tactic are the loony liberals going to use to enslave us? Using both would seem pretty self-defeating.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (March 24, 2008 8:37 am ET)
             

          How many American people own stock in an oil company?

          Oh, never mind... 

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (March 24, 2008 8:35 am ET)
           

        This will be a plus...

        The media will then tell us he's the "conservation president." 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by blu2waz (March 23, 2008 11:39 pm ET)
         

         Matthews may not have commented sufficiently on his Saturday show, but on Hardball it was mentioned several times. 

         The opinion was offered and agreed to that the Dems were making campaign commercials showing McCain's senior moment/confusion.

         Matthews deserves a pass on this.  He's been pretty anti-war lately.

                                                        blu2waz

      Report Abuse
      • Author by BottleBlonde (March 24, 2008 10:56 am ET)
           

        No he doesn't deserve a pass.

        Good behavior on most occassions doesn't mean that one should get a pass on those occasions when one messes up.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by gg (March 24, 2008 3:29 am ET)
         
      BUSH [video clip]: If we were to allow our enemies to prevail in Iraq, the violence that is now declining would accelerate and Iraq would descend into CHAOS

      McCAIN [video clip]: I believe that if we set a date for withdrawal, you will see CHAOS and genocide in the region.

      What the hell do they think is happening now. 4,000 American soldiers dead; countless Iraqis dead, homeless, refuges; it is a war, i.e. by definition chaos.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SPAllen-Portland (March 24, 2008 8:53 am ET)
         

      Neither Matthews nor his guests pointed out McCain's gaff on AlQeada and Iran, Olbermann did so, hard, two nights in a row.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (March 24, 2008 8:59 am ET)
         

      There is now some reporting on Fox News and conservative websites...

      that McCain's gaffe was actually caused by his reading a liberal newspaper that morning.  As McCain was reading the liberal paper, and let's be fair, he was not feeling well--in fact, he tipped over into his oatmeal and almost suffered serious injury.  His handlers were johnny on the spot and pulled him out.  But the incident shook him.

      This was only an hour before his embarrassing gaffe in Jordan, according to Rush Limbaugh.com.  They are saying that the oxygen deprivation coupled with being disoriented after reading the liberal paper is what caused the gaffe. 

        

      Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (March 24, 2008 11:37 am ET)
           
        That being the case, our Prez cannot use that excuse because he can't, SORRY, he doesn't read the papers. At least our VP is, as a headline in the Pitsburgh newspaper reads, "Cheney Promotes MidEast Peace".  Now that is a headline. I hope Sen. McBush doesn't read that one, he'll become more confused, SORRY again, just confused. Sen. Lieberman may have a stroke but who cares.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.