About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Quinn suggests we "broom the Muslims out of the military," says internment "worked" during WWII

November 06, 2009 4:15 pm ET

From the November 6 edition of Clear Channel's The War Room with Quinn and Rose:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DAWUSS (November 06, 2009 4:17 pm ET)
      4  
      [http://i570.photobucket.com/albums/ss143/katiem215/0015btaw.gif]
      Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (November 06, 2009 5:05 pm ET)
        2  
        That this scumbag Jim Quinn can say something so pathetically racist...

        If I knew that an all out boycott of this jerk's show would make a difference, I'd say lets go for it!

        Was Mr. Quinn so up in arms about scooping up all the wacky fanatical Christians out of the Army after Tim McVeigh?? I seriously doubt it... and this proves his racism and worthless nature to this country!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Samurai Cowboy (November 06, 2009 5:59 pm ET)
          1  
          Since his audience is very small, I doubt boycotting would do any good. But people might want to start complaing to Sirius/XM about him as he broadcasts there.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (November 06, 2009 4:24 pm ET)
      4  
      Can we get rid of all the Evangelical wackos while we're sweeping? Just asking.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by proudconservative (November 06, 2009 5:16 pm ET)
          9
        When they start mowing down fellow soldiers while screaming, "may Jesus be praised", well then sweep away.

        I agree that unwarranted discrimination isn't acceptable but much of the profiling that needs to be done is limited by PC. Would any of us stay on a plane while a fellow passenger chanted, allah akbar?

        The preconception of mistrust lay with the muslim community and until they step up and clear their own ranks, they need to accept the suspicion. In WW II, the Japanese did stand up and proved their allegiance by serving as double agents, interpreters and fighting in the European theater. And America noticed and recognized the sacrifice that many had accepted because of the horrid acts committed by those from their homeland.

        The difference with radical islamic followers is that their religion demands blind allegiance without regard to honor, honesty, decency or just plain murdering innocent 'infidels'. When muslims stand up and demand these radicals be ostracized and actually fight against them and their reprehensible actions, then it will be easier to assume the best of their intentions. If they remain silent and inactive in policing their ranks, then don't be upset when people walk off of a plane in which you just invoked the name of allah.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (November 06, 2009 5:35 pm ET)
          1  
          You are ignorant.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (November 06, 2009 5:37 pm ET)
          1  
          And you're not a conservative, either. If you were a conservative, you'd understand that what this man is proposing is a) un-Constitutional and b) un-American. You're just a hate-filled bigot, not a conservative.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by proudconservative (November 06, 2009 5:45 pm ET)
              5
            binky,

            Thanks for your personality analysis, I'll make sure my handlers get to see it.(And by the by, you in no way reflected any hate filled bigotry yourself in your posting. Nope, nada, zippo. Your generalizations were just spot on!)

            Is using discrimination always hateful? Why can't we use reason and intellect to survey a scene or individual and say, "Danger Will Robinson?" and respond accordingly? If I do or say nothing to remove myself from group that has defined itself by their reprehensible actions, is it not reasonable that people might make the same evaluations of me? So answer the question, "Would you stay on a plane with someone invoking allah?"
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (November 06, 2009 5:53 pm ET)
              3  
              Nope, I don't post hate filled bigotry. My disdain for phony conservatives like you and your heroes are based upon your actions and your comments, not who you are.

              You are the one who posts generalizations, i.e., anyone who disagrees with your decidedly non-conservative viewpoints is a "lefty" or a "lib."

              And, yes, I'd stay on a plane with someone invoking allah, just like I'd stay on a plane with someone invoking the name of my own God. Unlike you, apparently, I don't spend my whole life worried about what COULD happen. I have enough sense to be able to recognize danger and I don't spend my time looking for it around every corner. You have a sad life.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by proudconservative (November 06, 2009 6:19 pm ET)
                  3
                Lefty or lib should be considered terms of endearment, but at least you know where I stand in any debate here. I speak often of liberalism and liberals as leftys, but that is a political perspective which is quickly shown in political scientific form. And usually when I ask others to define themselves they tend to harp about conservatives and never really admit of their political positioning.

                As far as the plane ride, what is it like being the only citizen of this great land to not think about 9-11 sitting next to a guy on a plane getting ready to take off while he's asking for allah's help? (Are you also the only American to get diarrhea and NOT think about finding a bathroom either?) Or what is it like to go walking down the street in Chicago or DC in the middle of the night? Or to never have to worry about the group of pagan motorcycle riders approaching your or your family in a darkened alley? Why, because you NEVER worry about what COULD happen and act without regard to safety! Oh, it must be just dandy to never worry about anything, lucky you! :>

                We all make all kinds of value judgments based on reason with experience (ie discrimination) and you shouldn't consider yourself closed minded or bigoted, just using God given common sense.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by worrierking (November 06, 2009 7:23 pm ET)
                  1  
                  What do you have against our cities, other religions, and bikers?

                  I've sat beside many people on planes who prayed to their God because they're terrified of flying.

                  And most of us, who've lived in major cities take offense at you rubes who assume that it's like walking in Baghdad.

                  And if you're walking down the street and a bunch of bikers are coming at you or your family, you must have done something to deserve their "scrutiny" unless they think you're someone else.

                  I've never heard of a case in which a biker gang terrorized a family out of the blue, for no reason.

                  All you've done here is played to all the stereotypes of the typical bedwetting wingnut.

                  These are all based on reason and experience, not on imagined monsters.



                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by proudconservative (November 06, 2009 7:36 pm ET)
                      2
                    titanofterror,

                    So if I am under 'scrutiny', are they being too discriminatory?

                    My point had to do with using common sense in judging our surroundings, where we place ourselves and the behavior of people around us.

                    As far as the plane experience, when someone asks the Lord for help, I believe that is interpreted much differently than someone invoking allah. It's been a long time, maybe going back to the civil war era, for a plane passenger to commandeer an airplane and fly it into a skyscaper while saying the Lord's Prayer. Just an observation.

                    By the by, pretty insightful of you to see the sarcasm in the hyperbole of my arguments. Wow, and here I thought roaming gangs of bikers were always attacking innocent families, scrutinized or not!
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by jmille426471 (November 09, 2009 7:57 am ET)
                         
                      It's too bad that some people hold such little value for constitutional rights that they are ready to throw them out the window the moment something bad happens. I know, it takes a little bit of character to think rationally and not turn into a frightened animal when something horrible happens. But if the constitution can't survive something like 9/11, much less something like this, It won't last long.

                      I'm sure you're familiar with this quote; "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." You see, our founding fathers also had much to be afraid of, but somehow managed to give us the rights we have now. Let's prove ourselves worthy of those rights by not discriminating against all muslims because of what one muslim did. Ok?
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by captfoster2 (November 07, 2009 3:23 am ET)
                     
                  Well PC...

                  Your wrong again...

                  I'm an ardent liberal... and if I were on a plane and the guy next to me was invoking Allah... I'd respect his moment, wait for him to finish, and then speak to him as an equal human being, perhaps taking the time to get to know his religion through his eyes... so that he knows that at least one American gives a damn enough to try and get to know him and his religion instead of assuming he had something to do with 9/11 or would potentially cause another one (which was an entirely different set of people that would not be the guy sitting next to me...

                  And that my friend is the big difference between you close minded conservatives and us open minded liberals!

                  You fear what you do not understand, we embrace that which we do not know, learn from it, accept it, and do our best to include and adapt so that that kind of stuff does not happen again!

                  So you go on living your life remembering the evil of 9/11 as if every Muslim was part of it... and I'll go on remembering 9/11 knowing that those who did it are dead!
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (November 06, 2009 5:55 pm ET)
              2  
              "If I do or say nothing to remove myself from group that has defined itself by their reprehensible actions, is it not reasonable that people might make the same evaluations of me?"

              Wow . . . . just WOW! I will repeat, you are ignorant.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by jonesjax2374 (November 06, 2009 6:01 pm ET)
                 
              Well you can't exactly step OFF a plane, can you? I've seen scarier things than peopel praying on planes. Anyway, you can't pick and choose freedom of religion. Muslims no; Flying Spaghetti Monsters yes, etc. Everyone is in the pool or out. This guy should have been discharged long ago though, based on his behavior.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by proudconservative (November 06, 2009 6:21 pm ET)
                  1
                Yes jones I agree, he should have been drummed out of the military a long time ago. Any thoughts on why he wasn't?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by jonesjax2374 (November 06, 2009 6:32 pm ET)
                     
                  Well THAT is the main story here. I dont have enough information yet. I've heard many theories: Army wants Muslims, etc. But if they gave him more leeway than they do gay officers, believe me, I'll comment. I naively thought you got kicked out of the Army fairly easily if you went aroudn talking about suicide bombing. Silly me. I am curious to see what develops.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jonesjax2374 (November 06, 2009 7:51 pm ET)
                       
                    Now my main feeling is that it wasn't political correctness that kept the lunatic in; it was the Army wanting their money's worth. They paid for him; they owned him. I wouldn't believe people who said they'd PAY ME BACK for medical education either.
                    Report Abuse
        • Author by Publius39 (November 06, 2009 6:08 pm ET)
          1  
          So does Christianity my friend. All major religions ask for blind allegiance. A good majority of mainstream muslims condemn violent behavior from radical fundamentalist, but most of these bigots never admit that. As for remaining silent, why don't you ask Christians to stand up and condemn KKK groups, anti-abortion attacks, and hate crimes against gays, then you can speak on the situation on level ground.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by blueline99 (November 06, 2009 6:51 pm ET)
          1  
          The Japanese-Americans (many of my family included) proved they were American by being part of the military and supporing the war effort, but that didn't prevent them from losing their homes and farms and everything they owned to go to internment camps for 3 years.

          It wasn't until the war was over were they released and reparations didn't come until 40 years later...

          The Japanese-American internment is meant to be a lesson of what we should never allow to happen again in this country... yet there are idiots out there who are calling for it.

          There were only 110,000 Japanese Americans interned... those in Hawaii were not... there are over a million Muslim-Americans... what do you think this country should do?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Boxer1979 (November 06, 2009 8:09 pm ET)
          1  
          In WW II, the Japanese did stand up and proved their allegiance by serving as double agents, interpreters and fighting in the European theater. And America noticed and recognized the sacrifice that many had accepted because of the horrid acts committed by those from their homeland.

          So put Japanese citizens in internment camps, then release them when they work with the american government, then bomb their homeland in return. WOW!

          [http://arikia.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/facepalm1.jpg]
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Boxer1979 (November 06, 2009 8:10 pm ET)
             
          In WW II, the Japanese did stand up and proved their allegiance by serving as double agents, interpreters and fighting in the European theater. And America noticed and recognized the sacrifice that many had accepted because of the horrid acts committed by those from their homeland.

          So put Japanese citizens in internment camps, then release them when they work with the american government, then bomb their homeland in return. WOW!

          [http://arikia.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/facepalm1.jpg]
          Report Abuse
        • Author by captfoster2 (November 07, 2009 3:12 am ET)
          1  
          proudconservative

          You have no sense what so ever as it pertains to history!

          Your interpretation of history is to say the least, pathetic.

          I'm curious as to your knowledge about the Spanish Inquisition and its absolutist ways that either you followed the strict wording of the Bible or you were tortured and/or put to death?

          Or the Puritans here in the states with their burning to the steak any women who tried to think for herself...

          Or the Mormons and how they dealt with non-believers?

          I won't even ask about Pat Robertson and his twisted 700 Club or any of the various Christian fundamentalists over the years in this country who have demanded a strict adherence to the Bible or its leaders crazy interpretations...

          Do not waste our time with some hate filled rhetoric against Muslims just because you can't find it in your heart to find compassion or any vague form of understanding to a religion you obviously detest!

          If your brand of conservatism is what it is... I have no use for it and as far as I'm concerned this country would be better off without it!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mwjarv (November 06, 2009 4:26 pm ET)
      5  
      I love how these people forget the actions of their own idols. In 1988 Ronald Regan issued a full apology for the internment camps. The legislation stated that government actions were based on "race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership". About $1.6 billion in reparations were later disbursed by the U.S. government to every surviving internee. Try reading something before making these idiotic statements. FCC anyone?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Sharpe (November 06, 2009 4:37 pm ET)
        4 2
        Reagan also was a proponent of nuclear non-proliferation which repugs hate. Conservatives just take up their causes when its convenient - reagan, the bible, the economy or the constitution. The constitution doesn't want religion being taught in the classroom, we will go with the bible for that one. Fighting environmentalists is not really supported in the bible or constitution, but what about the economy? Healthcare would certainly be supported by Jesus but reagan hated those commies and this is socialism.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by captfoster2 (November 06, 2009 5:09 pm ET)
          1  
          Sharpe,

          I'm torn between giving you a thumbs up or down and replying to your thoughts... perhaps I'm not reading your post correctly.

          Could you write out your post a bit more clearly so I can tell what exactly it is you are trying to say... it reads like it is all over the place.

          Some of what you say makes sense, while some does not.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Sharpe (November 06, 2009 5:57 pm ET)
            4  
            Sorry, I am saying that conservatives these days far too often cite whatever they can use to back up their opinion even if something else directly and/or more vehemently contradicts the exact same opinion. I see medicare as a perfect example - reagan, the best republican leader ever or soome Im told said medicare would destroy the US and take us down the road to communism but its apparent that not only do republicans now support medicare but manipulate it in order to deny America of universal healthcare by threatening that it could be taken away. Global warming is another good example. You would think "good christian Americans" would support environmental policies because it is protecting the earth which was "created by God" and because pollution destroys America but they resort to the idea that fighting global warming would destroy the economy or just deny it all together while not supporting any sort of environmentalist policy on the basis that it would hurt the economy not caring at all about what the bible might say about this. Creationism or intelligent design is a direct assault on the constitution which republicans so proudly say they love by completely contradicting the establishment clause and the ruling of the courts so they use the bible in order to support teaching creationism in school ignoring what the constitution says about it. Im just saying they often pick and choose what to cite while defending themselves while ignoring other constantly cited resources that directly contradict the same ideas. Hope that clarifies it for you.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by proudconservative (November 06, 2009 6:02 pm ET)
          5
        Reagan did exactly the correct thing and commented as you said....

        Yes, the Nation was then at war, struggling for its survival and it's not for us today to pass judgment upon those who may have made mistakes while engaged in that great struggle. Yet we must recognize that the internment of Japanese-Americans was just that: a mistake. For throughout the war, Japanese-Americans in the tens of thousands remained utterly loyal to the United States. Indeed, scores of Japanese-Americans volunteered for our Armed Forces, many stepping forward in the internment camps themselves. The 442d Regimental Combat Team, made up entirely of Japanese-Americans, served with immense distinction to defend this nation, their nation. Yet back at home, the soldier's families were being denied the very freedom for which so many of the soldiers themselves were laying down their lives.


        So I guess tomorrow the recruitment offices will start filling up with young muslims wanting to join the 'all islam brigade' to fight in Afghanistan, huh? The injustice of the Americans who happened to be Japanese was responded to with a willingness to disprove the assumption of guilt with dramatic action as I highlighted in President Reagan's remarks. Their treatment was horrible but they recognized that by changing the attitude of the nation towards them, they would prove their innocence. Pardon me, but I haven't seen the same kind of vigor to prove allegiance from the muslim community.

        Until the muslims in this country start standing up against their own radical elements and fighting these acts and actors, it's hard to imagine that their loyalties lay with this country, their country.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Publius39 (November 06, 2009 6:13 pm ET)
          2  
          Until the muslims in this country start standing up against their own radical elements and fighting these acts and actors, it's hard to imagine that their loyalties lay with this country, their country.


          Because Muslims are the only ones who ever commit atrocities, massacres, or anything else that's violent. Until Christians denounce people who bomb abortion clinics, kill doctors that provide abortion services, and stop denying gays the right to marry, American loyalty is to be questioned by everyone.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by blueline99 (November 06, 2009 7:00 pm ET)
          1  
          there were 110,000 Japanese Americans interned in the mainland and 150,000 Japanese Americans in Hawaii that were not interned (because they made up almost half of the population)

          The 442nd wasn't formed until 1943... because the US Army didn't trust the Japanese Americans that were already in the Army Reserve out of Pearl Harbor.

          They asked all draft eligible Japanese Americans who were held in Internment camps if they would swear loyalty to the US. 25% said no.

          When the Army put together the 442nd... 10,000 volunteered from Hawaii only 1,200 volunteered from the Mainland.

          I guess the point of my post is that loyalty is a two way street. When the Japanese were treated like criminals, they behaved like criminals and a minority of them would no longer swear loyalty to the US, in order to be part of the draft. When an equal number were called to server from Hawaii... they rose to the occassion.

          So to say that the Japanese Americans stepped up and proved their loyalty... they did, but not as enthusiastically as history remembers... those who were treated with respect stood up... those who had a boot on their chest didn't.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by proudconservative (November 06, 2009 7:45 pm ET)
              3
            How have we now criminalized the behavior of muslims? Was there a plan to isolate them before or after 9-11 or previous twin tower bombing?

            I agree that the treatment of people of Japanese ancestry was inexcusable, but how come the acts of a few radical muslims are met with silence and inaction within their own community? This isn't just happening here but throughout the world, islamists attack the innocent and are intolerant of religion except their own?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by proudconservative (November 06, 2009 7:45 pm ET)
              3
            How have we now criminalized the behavior of muslims? Was there a plan to isolate them before or after 9-11 or previous twin tower bombing?

            I agree that the treatment of people of Japanese ancestry was inexcusable, but how come the acts of a few radical muslims are met with silence and inaction within their own community? This isn't just happening here but throughout the world, islamists attack the innocent and are intolerant of religion except their own?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by proudconservative (November 06, 2009 7:46 pm ET)
              3
            How have we now criminalized the behavior of muslims? Was there a plan to isolate them before or after 9-11 or previous twin tower bombing?

            I agree that the treatment of people of Japanese ancestry was inexcusable, but how come the acts of a few radical muslims are met with silence and inaction within their own community? This isn't just happening here but throughout the world, islamists attack the innocent and are intolerant of religion except their own?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by jonesjax2374 (November 06, 2009 9:10 pm ET)
                 
              But this wasn't met with silence. I heard immediately after this incident CAIR calling it deplorable - inexcusable. That IS the American Islam Community.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (November 06, 2009 4:27 pm ET)
      2  
      The military is an arm of the government. The government, by virtue of the First Amendment, cannot deny its members the free exercise of their religious beliefs.

      What these idiots are proposing is, in fact, disregard for the First Amendment, which is ironic because they are the ones always griping about the First Amendment when ANYONE questions their crapola.

      My suggestion? Read the Constitution, you might be surprised what's in it and what's not.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by opopop (November 06, 2009 4:40 pm ET)
        1  
        You know, if that is what they want, that is what they want, I just find something else funny about it.
        These people would always claim how America is the greatest country in the world, and its the land of the free, and didn't Glenn Beck even claim people went to America cause it has the best healthcare?
        Anyway, besides that, I noticed on RedState, comments left by people bad mouthing foreign countries, Europe mostly, or like Scotland over that Libyian terrorists release. One comment claimed to know the history of Scotland and its people and how they changed into wusses, (pretty sure Braveheart was the source for it).

        But sorry for gettin off my point, if this stuff Quinn suggests were to actually happen, guaranteed most of the world would look harshly on America being so discriminating, and so any negotiatins with U.S.A or talks mightn't be as friendly, but yet, far right conservatives can't see this racism, and so if it were to happen, and America were condemned, these nutjobs would bad mouth the rest of the world, how we're all weak and such, P.S I seen Ireland bad mouthed over not goin to Iraq on RedState aswell and cherry picked parts of my countrys history to bad mouth the Ireland of today. I wasn't happy to say the least.
        Sadly, the way these folks seem to have been hyped up recently, if Palin or some other Rush supported far right winger gets into power, safely put, America is F"cked!

        Sorry, rant over ha ha
        Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (November 06, 2009 4:49 pm ET)
         
      Internment didn't work during WW II, actually. First of all, it was locking the barn after the horse was stolen. Second, what we really needed right at the outbreak of World War 2 was people who could read and speak the Japanese language. Rather than reach out to those who had braved all the difficulties of moving to a foreign country, learning a new language, growing used to a new culture, and asking for their help, we locked them up instead. Flash forward fifty years, and we once more need people who speak a foreign language, Arabic in this case, and Mr. Quinn is once more advocating locking up the very people who could be of most help to us, and have either been born here or chosen this country over the land of their birth!

      Brilliant, right? Yeah. Very very very far right.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blueline99 (November 06, 2009 5:03 pm ET)
      2  
      In WWII, Japanese Americans formed a the 442nd... their motto was "Go For Broke" and they even made a movie about it.

      It's amazing how we interned the Japanese Americans in the mainland (My parents were both interned)... yet in Honolulu, there was no internment because the Japanese Americans there were too vital to the support of the military...

      Where was the biggest threat of espinoage and sabotage... in Hood River, Oregon (where my Grandfathers Apple Orchards were lost) or in Pearl Harbor?

      The notion that the internment worked is something so ridiculous and stupid it's hard to take anything else he says seriously.

      This is something that Michelle Malkin would say and if you are playing at that level then you are an idiot.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (November 06, 2009 5:04 pm ET)
      2  
      How about we intern all the Muslims in this country and raise the taxes of loud mouth right wing talk radio hacks to pay for it.

      Or maybe better yet, just intern all the loud mout right wing talk radio hacks.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (November 06, 2009 6:49 pm ET)
         
      By that line of reasoning, maybe we should get rid of the Irish in our military too.

      You're a disgrace to the rest of us narrowbacks.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (November 06, 2009 8:03 pm ET)
         
      Quinn suggests we "broom the Muslims out of the military," says internment "worked" during WWII

      How about we broom you up and put you in internment camps along with the other right-wing kooks!

      *Facepalm*
      Report Abuse
    • Author by teabaggers ♥ [wing]NUTS (November 07, 2009 1:08 am ET)
         
      im sure michelle malkin would agree.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by 1939NavyAddition (November 08, 2009 4:19 pm ET)
         
      During WWII, brave patriots of both Japanese and Germany descent served in the US Miliary with distinction.

      Those of Enemy Alien nationality who posed a threat were kept safely off the streets and out of the West Coast Red War Zone through relocation and internment. Although some acts of subversion occured, the policy was for the most part successful, protecting both the homeland and the enemy nationals.

      Worth considering some form today.
      Report Abuse