O'Reilly on 14 percent of poll respondents who think Fox News is "mostly liberal": "Those people are in crackhouses"
November 02, 2009 9:23 pm ET
From the November 2 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:


Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts
Contrary to media hype, Sarah Palin is very unpopular|
|
||
![]() |
||
Who could possibly think Fox is mostly liberal?? There has to be something wrong with that poll.
The craziest of the the craziest wingnuts. They want fox to be handing out guns and telling their viewers to go out and get the "communists", "acorn activists" and "liberal elitists".
It's scary to think ANYONE could find fox liberal.
The 14% are hard-right conservatives and knuckleheads who just wanted to "have a little fun" with the pollsters.
I think you know which crack I'm talking about.
I doubt that it will make them any more rational or any less likely to swallow any of what faux feeds them, but it would be nice for them to recognize what faux is : a GOP talking point platform. The next step for wingnuts anonymous will then be to recognize the lies and misinformation spouted daily.
On yesterday’s Fox O’Reilly Factor show O’Reilly revealed the results of a Pew Research Center survey of Fox viewers. Apparently 33% of Fox viewers are actually Democrats – confirming my theory (see below) that many opponents of Fox watch it, and that any claims (explicit or implicit) that high ratings give credence to Fox’s warped political views are nonsense.
Interestingly, O’Reilly reported only the Democrat numbers. By doing so, he gave (deliberately, I imagine) the impression that the remaining 64% are those supportive of Fox views. Of course, like most of what Fox opines, that is rubbish. Suspecting that many of the 64% were likely to be Independents who are as appalled at Fox’s malignancy as any Democrat, I checked the Pew report.
It turns out that Independents make up 22%, Others 6% and, hilariously, Republicans only 39%. In other words, 61% of Fox viewers are people highly unlikely to watch Fox for its “truths” about the political debate. That’s more than the half I earlier surmised.
O’Reilly quickly recognised that this was going to be difficult to explain away. So he spent much of the programme on a revisionist explanation of what sort of a channel Fox really is. It turns out it’s an “entertainment” channel, not one apparently devoted to serious presentation of issues. And to make that palatable to those who thought that Fox was ever serious, it turns out that the other cables are only entertainment channels too. According to Fox no-one does serious political reporting and discussion. .
Brilliant! Fox gets to save its bacon (or thinks it does) by pretending the other cables are pigs too. Vintage Fox.
Here’s what I said earlier:
I actually agree with Bill'O. LOL!