Rush: "I don't think" Obama "cares about Afghanistan"; claims Obama's Dover visit was a "photo op"
November 01, 2009 11:07 am ET
From the November 1 broadcast of Fox Broadcasting's Fox News Sunday:

Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts|
|
||
![]() |
||
Limbaugh = human piece of garbage.
Fixed.
But he cared...
He is a Man ready for War as long as Poor Whites, Blacks & Hispanics do the Grind.
"We Support The Troops" These words are easy to say when you are sitting in America Safe & Secure.
But when you are in Afghanistan being Shot at these words are not quite so Pure.
Speak truth to power.
Mr. News
Ask yourself, how can it get worse than El-Rushbo first thing in the morning?
Rush is still living in "Miami Vice" times.....
Facts, El Fathead.
~
A Marine Mom
Mr. Limbaugh? Where were you when President Bush took a giant wrong turn in the 'war on terror' by diverting our forces from Afghanistan to Iraq? Oh, that's right. You were cheering him on, and saying anyone who was opposed to this war of opportunity was an unpatriotic marxist communist fascist yada yada yada.
As for photo ops, why are we still fighting?!
What you believe is irrelevant, unless we are talking about theology. What you can prove, you don't want to reveal, because the facts, and history, are not on your side.
Given that Bush didn't visit Afghanistan until six years into the war there, and Obama visited before he was even elected, who really cared about Afghanistan? And, what do you imagine victory in Afghanistan will look like? Filled with white people, a Mao-Mart on every corner, parking lots full of SUVs? Dare to be honest, Rush.
Democrats may seem soft on defense, but that is a misperception created by you and yours to deflect from the fact that the right-wing is made up primarily of chickenhawks.
One of the reasons I have Mother Jones on my RSS feed is their daily (Mon-Fri) post: We're Still at War: Photo of the Day for [date].
Stepping slightly off-topic, do any of the 'older' (middle age and above) readers/commenters remember when the News (ABC, NBC, CBS, etc.) used to have reports on events outside the United States. I'm not referring to when an American is killed in a plane crash in France or such, but actual News Stories about what's happening in other countries that aren't of immediate interest to US residents? I remember the names of some of the leaders from the 1960's better than I know the names of leaders of countries today, since I never hear anything (exc. Putin, unshirted) on the TV or Radio about them, I had to create a World News section on Yahoo (MyYahoo) to get information about what other countries are doing.
Of course, this is one of the reasons why the younger Americans know nothing about other nations (e.g. where is Afghanistan on an unmarked world map?), along with the No Child Left Educated push of the Neocons.
And then came Ronald Reagan.
He sold this war to his followers from the beginning. And he has refused to confront the price that others have paid for the misadventure he triumphed.
People like him never experience the nightmare that they promote. They just climb on the bodies to make themselves appear taller.
And "I don't think (Obama) cares about Afghanistan." I don't think Bush cared about Afghanistan. Can I be interviewed now on Fox? Clearly as an American citizen, my voice is just as legit, right?
Oh I thought it was the thing to do as a Commander in Chief. He lited the ban to honor families decision if they wanted their son or daughter photographed then thy could do that. Bush never went to Dover Air Force Base. Did Wallance bring that up? NOOOOO!
Plus if Bush did the things he should have done 6 years ago the war in Afghanistan would be over. Instead he dithered away from that to move to a war with a country that did nothing to us.
Soulless bombastic bimbo is too nice a description of Rush, but it'll have to do.
Randy
At a time when they're (private defense contractors) trying to pressure and intimidate the Commander in Chief (our President) into making a snap decision about Afghanistan troop levels, and they're publicly doing this via press releases and interviews and even public speeches (Gates and McCrystal), from the U.S. Senate and House floors no less...
And this private citizen rush limbaugh takes center stage on News Corp's (and the RNC's) broadcast arm Fox 'News' Channel, and he publicly cries out across the cable spectrum on your television, that the Commander in Chief doesn't care about the fact that he inherited U.S. Troops in Afghanistan (put there by George W. Bush according to a strategy of his and Dick Cheney's and donald rumsfeld etc.), and that their lives are now not only his responsibility (which they are of course), but that rush expresses his disapproval, worse his malicious disrespect...
A private citizen has this much power on our Public Airwaves Radio and Television, that he scolds the Commander in Chief about U.S. Troops in Afghanistan on television...
A private person in the employ of privately owned and programmed media corporations, he has that kind of publicly challenging power to damn someone on the Public Airwaves Radio and Television, he has this power on the Public Airwaves...
But you don't.
You can't give your political opinion about this issue of National Policy on broadcast television, you have no opportunity to defend your own political opinion against rush limbaugh's destructive and slanderous insults agianst our President, but rush has this precious privately-controlled power of a public resource the Public Airwaves Radio and Television...
Why?
Why isn't there anybody demanding EQUAL TIME in this matter on the Public Airwaves, or even REPLY TIME for being personally attacked on the Public Airwaves, and demanding the same political power that rush limbaugh has on our public resource Public Airwaves Radio and Television.
It's not right.
I don't know who it is that forfeited our regulatory EQUAL TIME and REPLY TIME provisions of FCC Regulations over our PUBLIC AIRWAVES RADIO TELEVISION, forfeited to rupert murdoch and several other politically-minded private broadcasters using our property to their private advantage... I don't know why they did that, only that it has to be undone, soon.
MMfA, you could have just stopped right there.
I could have given a better more interesting interview than Chris Wallace.
Almost everything Rush said bore out of ignorance, stupidity and hate, which means most of what Rush said was nonsense. For example: Why didn't Chris defend the President of the United States when Rush said Obama is a radical and he don't really care about the American troops fighting the war in afghanistan? And why didn't Chris ask Rush to tell the world why he would vote Palin for President? Rush had the nerve to say Sarah Palin is ready to be President of the United States. Who on earth with an once of brain thinks Palin is ready to be President? Such a statement should have follow up questions, like did you actually watch Palin campaign during the 2009 election? Now tell us what makes you think Sarah Palin is qualified to be commander and chief? Hell, I want to know what kind of idiotic answer would Rush give.
The President is black, why don't we see a more diverse perspective and opinions on TV? Opinions and perspectives that would be fair and balanced.
White people will let other white people get away without really being challenged (for the most part), unlike real inteligent black people (not uncle-toms) who knows BS when they see it.