Memo to Rush: Continuing to call yourself "colorblind" doesn't make it so
October 29, 2009 3:47 pm ET
From the October 29 edition of Premiere Radio Network's The Rush Limbaugh Show:


Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts|
|
||
![]() |
||
I've rarely if ever heard a liberal claim to be colorblind. We may aspire to become colorblind, and that is a noble goal. But you don't typically hear a liberal claim "I am colorblind."
Ironically, the people who claim to be colorblind are, typically, those who are the most racist. Apparently they believe that claiming to be colorblind will innoculate them from accusations of racism.
But what they don't realize is that, in reality, when they claim to be colorblind, they might as well have put on a shirt with big bold letters proudly proclaiming: "RACIST AND PROUD OF IT."
Liberals are more able to honestly assess their own shortcomings and see the big picture.
Conservatives simply lie to try to cover their arse.
However, what separates us from animals is our ability to override our primitive instincts using logic and higher intelligence. Otherwise, we'd be going around humping everything that moved and using each other as sources of food.
It's funny. I like to think of myself as a very open-minded individual, but even then, I have to actively remind myself that I am making assumptions or generalizations on occasion. They are never malicious, but they are little things I struggle with in my sub-conscious. I try to be aware of them as much as possible, but it's hard to overcome what 21 years of indoctrination and the media has done to a girl. As a result, I tend to dislike white people more than black people to compensate for what I feel is unequal racial treatment in this nation. I do not want any part of what I feel generations of bigotry have upheld as legitimate, but consequently I am being inadvertently racist.
It's mind-boggling to figure out how to actually be "colorblind", but the best way to progress is to openly talk about racism with one another. However, Rush's comments essentially suggest that racism does not exist, and therefore, there is no need to discuss it.
Yes, it's an uncomfortable subject, but the more people can talk about their feelings of inadequacy or inherent prejudices with eachother then the more people will realize that each race/religion/gender/nation/culture has a lot more in common than we could have ever imagined. We are all human. We are all connected. We must love and protect one another.
Does anyone else feel the same way? Or am I a lone wolf?
But, time is not on Rush's side. Plus, the Republicans 'racist' rants have turned people off. Seems like the game may be coming to an end for Rush, Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, FoxNews and Others. Republicans want to WIN, and now it seems like they can't use 'racist rants'. Uh, oh. LOL.
With respect, I would disagree on a small point. I hear you, but I think you're being a bit too literal about Limbaugh's use of the term "colorblind" when you say that humans are not "wired to be colorblind". Of course human beings notice physical differences: they notice differences in ratios of facial features and hair types and bone structure and all sorts of physical differences, but that has next to nothing to do with race. It's important to distinguish physical differences in general from the very specific notion of race. Race has as much to do with skin color as it does to do with qualities of hair and facial structure, and the category of race is and always has been highly historically and culturally arbitrary.
I would emphatically argue that there's no evidence whatsoever to suggest that the human race is somehow "wired" to be aware of race -- especially since race isn't even a biologically recognizable category among humans. Race is a category that emerged at a specific time and in a specific social and cultural context. People have been and always will be capable of being aware of physical differences, but it was a particular historical and social setting that gave rise to the notion of racial difference.
Now, with that said, I agree with you insofar as I understand your point to be that people born in a society with specific racial categories will be aware of those racial categories, since those are categories of identity. But I just want to voice my concern about the idea that people are "wired" to recognize "color" or race: there's nothing natural about claiming that the Irish are a race one century but not the next. Race is, however, a very real social thing -- as real as social constructs like law or language -- and for a person to claim that he or she is unaware of it is, I think, unrealistic.
`When _I_ use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, `it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less.'
`The question is,' said Alice, `whether you CAN make words mean so many different things.'
`The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, `which is to be master - - that's all.'
He is colorblind.
How are you going to see any color when your head is that far up your ass?
We should all celebrate our ethnicities and heritage and the things that makes us who we are. It's possible to embrace our differences and uniqueness without treating each others as inferiors because of those differences.
.