About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Offended Beck claims Obama "used the troops coming home in coffins as a photo-op"

October 29, 2009 12:00 pm ET

From the October 29 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by epkklk851 (October 29, 2009 12:10 pm ET)
      13  
      Let's see the President of the United States turned out to give a final salute to the men or women who gave their all for their country on his orders as the Commander in Chief. Am I offended? No, I think the President, whoever he or she may be, should see the coffins come home at least once. Sometimes their orders ask so much. And George Bush only gave up golfing towards the end of it all. He is on film talking about the war effort and then inviting people to watch his swing. That was offensive. And another thing, he may have given up golf, but he didn't give up mountain biking, which closed down all or part of Quantico every time he went, and he didn't give up his vacations, which amount to a full third of the time he spent in office, and he kept his hours at the office short, too. That offended me.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (October 29, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
        5  
        First thing that popped into my mind, when I saw the CoC had done this, was that Beck and his ilk would have this reaction.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by epkklk851 (October 29, 2009 12:23 pm ET)
          5  
          I was very impressed with the President's salute, but yes, I too can see how it would wind up someone like Beck. And yes, I am sure that he would complain if the President didn't show up. Maybe I should go to the Tomb of the Unknowns on Veteran's Day. I went to the ceremony on Memorial Day a view years back. It is a really big deal.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (October 29, 2009 1:02 pm ET)
          6  
          That was the second thing that popped into my mind. The first was how proud I am of our President.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Conchobhar (October 29, 2009 1:08 pm ET)
            4  
            That's why you're the king.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by pezzimiztix (October 29, 2009 1:48 pm ET)
              10
            you're proud of the president? what does it tell you when he bashes the war in iraq by saying the real war is in afghanistan that WE MUST WIN. then, his appointed general, says we need this to win and your president that you're so proud of takes his time and offering the mind-numbing excuse of 'taking my time because i will always think before sending troops into harms way." what about the troops already there? i guess they're not that important. let's see, he rams stimulus (tons of earmarks - which he lied about), gitmo, and now forcing health care without reading a line of it, BUT NOW he wants to take his time while americans die in increasing numbers SINCE they asked for more support?
            again, you are proud of a man like this??????
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (October 29, 2009 2:34 pm ET)
              6  
              You just posted a load of sludge.

              Wow . . . do you EVER listen to or read ANYTHING objective or do you just watch Fox and listen to hate talk radio? If you simply did a little research, you'd find that NONE of what you posted is true. It's called talking points.

              BTW, you do understand that Presidents set policy, it is up to Congress to legislate it. Presidents don't WRITE law, Congress does. It doesn't matter if he reads the health care bill at this point or not. Try reading the Constitution.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by mjh (October 29, 2009 2:34 pm ET)
              6  
              "what does it tell you when he bashes the war in iraq by saying the real war is in afghanistan that WE MUST WIN. then, his appointed general, says we need this to win and your president that you're so proud of takes his time and offering the mind-numbing excuse of 'taking my time because i will always think before sending troops into harms way." what about the troops already there? i guess they're not that important." -- pez dispenser



              Well pez, what did it tell YOU when his predecessor refused to supply proper body armor for the troops in that all-important war in Iraq -- or when he sat on the decision to surge troops there for four months??

              Report Abuse
            • Author by mescal (October 29, 2009 6:58 pm ET)
              4  
              Well, Pez, the truth be told, the numbness that your mind is clearly suffering from has nothing to do with anything that President Obama has said. It has far more to do with the number of empty reich wing talking points that you've forced yourself to memorize.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by bewildered (October 29, 2009 12:25 pm ET)
        7  
        Bush didn't give up golf either. Here's the link to a Huffington Post article:

        http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/16/bush-lied-about-giving-up_n_102138.html
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dimes (October 29, 2009 12:14 pm ET)
      5  
      If the President hadn't done this, would Beck be complaining about his absence?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Tiredog (October 29, 2009 12:20 pm ET)
        6  
        "If the President hadn't done this, would Beck be complaining about his absence?"

        Absolutely.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by marco21 (October 29, 2009 12:22 pm ET)
          9  
          These are the same folks who whined over the President's choice of mustard, after all.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by epkklk851 (October 29, 2009 12:26 pm ET)
            6  
            Yes, I once talked to a lady who complained because I brought Kosher hotdogs to a picnic and she made the same complaint that Sean did-"This is America." What if I like Dijon Mustard on my Kosher hotdog? It's good.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Conchobhar (October 29, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
              5  
              "This is America, Land of the Free, Home of the Brave," where you're free to eat yellow mustard on your hot dog and ketchup on your hamburger. If you're brave enough to let your own taste buds direct your choice, you're obviously un-American.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by John Paradox (October 29, 2009 7:39 pm ET)
                1  
                you're free to eat yellow mustard on your hot dog and ketchup on your hamburger.


                As long as it's not Heinz (2004 Kerry-bashing reference)
                Report Abuse
            • Author by tbone (October 29, 2009 12:44 pm ET)
              2  
              Give me liberty or give me death. Except when it comes to mustard.

              Question: If I choose Dijon or I choose "French's", do I still hate America? Is Catsup the only honorable alternative?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by epkklk851 (October 29, 2009 12:52 pm ET)
                5  
                Either way, it's French, and French is bad! Zut alorhs! Les Americaines sont tres bizzares quelquefois!
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Conchobhar (October 29, 2009 1:12 pm ET)
                  3  
                  Good grief, woman! You not only understand French, you use it! This borders on sabotage! Why not just sing the Internationale?
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by Conchobhar (October 29, 2009 12:32 pm ET)
            7  
            They were also ok with turning an aircraft carrier around, using a fighter jet as a limo, and delaying sailors' & marines' liberties and reunions with their families, so they could be used as background props in Bush's "Mission Accomplished" photo op.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by Indy (October 29, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
      4  
      This sad little clown psychopath is so predictable with his cut and paste outrage. Showing respect for the fallen should be off limits but leave to this creep to offend the families and friends of these brave soldiers for ratings.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (October 29, 2009 3:58 pm ET)
        1  
        "This sad little clown psychopath is so predictable with his cut and paste outrage"Nice imagery, I like that. It works for Gretchen Carlson, too.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Oklad (October 29, 2009 12:36 pm ET)
      4  
      Glenn Beck should be broadcasting from Death Valley. After all it is the lowest elevation in the hemisphere.
      .
      .
      Report Abuse
      • Author by angesam (October 29, 2009 12:47 pm ET)
        4  
        There is no reasoning with the right. They are all so sad. It is a great thing the Commander in Chief has done. I couldn't be prouder of our country and our leader.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by srichardson (October 29, 2009 12:42 pm ET)
      2  
      He's so darn ignorant and such a hypocrite. Who gives a crap if this nutjob is offended by Obama paying respects to fallen soldiers? I seriously doubt the President thought, "What will Beck think?" What has this piece of crap ever done for his country that he has ANY right to complain about anybody? Not a darn good thing! I find it offensive that this piece of crap feels like he has any place to say anything about any fallen soldier. People like Beck talk about patriotism but do nothing to back up that talk. He makes millions of dollars by injecting stupidity into the American public. What a worthless mooncalf (O'Reilly's word of the day yesterday!)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (October 29, 2009 12:43 pm ET)
      3  
      Your use of occasion of these brave troops final return home for political purposes is disgustingly disrespectful, Beck. This is one of your lowest points.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (October 29, 2009 12:53 pm ET)
      3  
      I would bet, that most, if not all of the families whose fallen came home last night were more than OK with the POTUS coming out to salute these heroes one last time.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by angryofmayfair61 (October 29, 2009 1:15 pm ET)
          10
        I would suggest that the families of our fallen soldiers would be questioning why POTUS has not made any decision on sending the troups that his hand-picked general requested over 2 months ago.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (October 29, 2009 1:39 pm ET)
          6  
          Because the families of the soldiers and the soldiers themselves know that generals don't make policy, they carry out orders.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (October 29, 2009 1:43 pm ET)
          8  
          I don't think that most families would question it at all if they understood the context - I think you're totally wrong. Now, if all they get is YOUR version of the story, then yeah, they might feel that way. And that's why the White House and MMFA is trying to get that biased portrait that you and FoxNews paints exposed for what it is - something that hurts the national debate we SHOULD be having on issues and replacing it with false talking points.

          Here are the facts. There are no troops available for an immediate deployment to Afghanistan. President Bush chose to invade Iraq, and that extensive deployment really depleted the mission-ready troops we are going to have for years to come.

          We won't have any substantial troops until about 9 months from now. So, the decision doesn't have to be made immediately. If Obama waited until next Spring, then yeah, logistically, that much of a delay might push back any potential deployment a little while, since we can't just send tens of thousands of troops with a moment's notice. However, waiting from September to November will have no effect whatsoever on those troops shipping out next summer. None.

          Now, on the other hand, having a plan that is decided upon after careful consideration IS a good thing that all Americans should applaud.

          If the families were made aware of the facts above, if FoxNews lost its credibility as they should, or if they stopped pushing false talking points, or if they simply went out of business, if we didn't have to deal with this nonsense, America would be a better place.

          Those people who continue to push for FoxNews, et al right to push these false talking points are unpatriotic. They don't want the best for America. They don't want a fair debate of the topics under discussion. They can't win a fair debate, and so they use this nonsense!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (October 29, 2009 2:27 pm ET)
          5  
          Do you think they were questioning the fact that the previous administration sat on troop requests for EIGHT MONTHS prior to the inauguration of Mr. Obama? Shortly after taking office, Mr. Obama granted the request that Mr. Bush ignored for 8 months.

          You really should research the crap you're hearing on Fox and hate talk radio. They're lying to you . . . they have an agenda to push and ratings to achieve, they don't have time to tell you the truth. [I know that The Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes has denied this is true, but then Stephen Hayes is a charter member of the PNAC [and therefore NOT a true conservatives] . . . his "truth" is suspect.]
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Oklad (October 29, 2009 3:11 pm ET)
            6  
            " they have an agenda to push and ratings to achieve."

            SpongeBob SquarePants has higher ratings than Fox but nobody looks to him for foreign policy..:)
            .
            Report Abuse
            • Author by srichardson (October 29, 2009 4:13 pm ET)
              3  
              Fox viewers would probably learn more if they did turn to Sponge Bob.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (October 29, 2009 4:59 pm ET)
              4  
              Reruns of Smallville on The CW have higher ratings than they do, but that fact seems to just slip by the ratings rooters.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by The_Cat (October 30, 2009 2:10 pm ET)
              1  
              Hey Oklad! Don't give Beck any ideas, now! ;)
              Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (October 29, 2009 4:26 pm ET)
          2  
          his hand-picked general requested over 2 months ago

          Since the dawn of warfare, generals have always wanted more troops. It justifies their existence. Make a note of it.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by fishgirl26 (October 29, 2009 1:05 pm ET)
      7  
      I have a theory as to why the president went to Dover last night. I don't feel that it was for publicity at all. I think he wanted to FEEL what that was like. To SEE for HIMSELF the cost. When thinking of what to do he wants to SEE the result. People like Beck don't think that deeply.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Cheney2012 (October 29, 2009 1:35 pm ET)
        1 12
        George Bush met with families, went to Walter Reed and did many things to FEEL to cost of the war. He knew darn well about the cost of the war. Much more so than a wet-behind-the-ears statist could ever claim to know

        The difference is Mr. Bush didn't feel the need to make a media event out of what he was doing...i.e. it wasn't all about him
        Report Abuse
        • Author by all your eyes (October 29, 2009 1:47 pm ET)
          2 1
          That you would join Mr. Beck in impugning the President, the Commander in Chief, for visiting the returning coffins of American servicemen, shows what an unpatriotic, shrill partisan you are.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by srichardson (October 29, 2009 1:49 pm ET)
          6  
          Yeah, Bush is a real hero. If Bush would've taken some time to actually "think" about the war instead of acting on feelings then maybe President Obama wouldn't have to be making the tough decisions now.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by John Paradox (October 29, 2009 9:27 pm ET)
            1  
            Speaking of 'think before act', here's a cartoon from Steve Benson, Arizona Republic:

            [http://i.azcentral.com/i/3/0/0/PHP4AE9003ED9003.jpg]
            Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (October 29, 2009 1:50 pm ET)
          6  
          George Bush also checked under his desk and in the drawers for weapons of mass destruction as our young men and women were dying.

          And yes, he did make a media event out of the search.

          Every president should be required to confront the results of his decisions. This one did just that early this morning in Delaware.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by fishgirl26 (October 29, 2009 2:13 pm ET)
          5  
          GWB never went to see those coffins return home. He met with families...big deal...he went to Walter Reed..only when it was falling apart. He had NO idea..he and Cheney were both draft dodgers. They felt fine sending someone else's kids off to war. He spent alot of time hiding at his ranch.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (October 29, 2009 2:19 pm ET)
          7  
          Give me a break. Don't make Bush out to be a hero. He's not and never has been. He is the one who chose to unnecessarily invade a country which had not attacked us, had not threatened to attack us and had no means to attack us. In the past, leaders of countries which prosecuted unprovoked invasions were considered war criminals and were tried as such.

          Bush is directly responsible for the unnecessary deaths of over 4000 of our best and brightest and untold thousands of innocent Iraqi citizens. [Don't give me the "well, Congress" excuse, either. Congress outlined two specific criteria in the AUMF and Bush LIED in his letter confirming that those criteria were met. Both are available for viewing online.] Don't paint him out to be a compassionate leader. He is not and was not.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by lewislaw7153 (October 29, 2009 2:20 pm ET)
          5  
          DUH, are you serious . .

          How about MISSION ACCOMPLISHED . .
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (October 29, 2009 2:42 pm ET)
          3  
          "George Bush met with families, went to Walter Reed and did many things to FEEL to cost of the war. He knew darn well about the cost of the war. Much more so than a wet-behind-the-ears statist could ever claim to know" -- CheneySentencedIn2012


          Yeah, Dumbya knew so much -- attributable to his extensive war experience in Vietnam.

          Oh, wait . . .


          "The difference is Mr. Bush didn't feel the need to make a media event out of what he was doing...i.e. it wasn't all about him"


          Yeah -- sure it wasn't:

          [http://roadkillrefugee.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/mission-accomplished.png]
          Report Abuse
        • Author by MaineiacMan (October 29, 2009 3:39 pm ET)
            2
          As unpopular as that comment is on this site, thanks for making it.
          If President Obama wanted a moment of solemn reflection, or new perspective he could have done the trip to Dover without a cameraman. In fact, I think he's stupid for having his picture taken there. He'd have been smarter to do it without the photoshoot and then leak to the press that he was present as the coffin's of fallen solders arrived. I think that would have been more dignified and Presidential. He didnt though, everything is about him and he does everything for image...i.e. doctors in white robes in the Rose Garden
          Report Abuse
        • Author by jonesjax2374 (October 29, 2009 3:53 pm ET)
          2  
          I dont think ex-President Cheney multiple draft dodger thought much about the cost of war. I'm sure he thought abuot the profit side.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (October 29, 2009 4:29 pm ET)
          3  
          it wasn't all about him

          Well, we do know about Dubya mocking the woman who was going to be executed and petitioned for a reprieve.

          The only thing he cared about was getting revenge on Saddam for trying to kill his daddy. That's it.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Boxer1979 (October 29, 2009 5:16 pm ET)
          2  
          You are a troll who knows nothing. Go Away!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by robyn20094113 (October 29, 2009 11:14 pm ET)
          1  
          It is amazing that Bush could even face any of the soldiers, he met at Walter Reed, considering it's deplorable conditions. And he did nothing about it. That's the thanks they got for fighting his unnecessary war.
          Bush, wouldn't want to make a media event out of it, he was hiding in shame.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by jbraskin4786 (October 29, 2009 1:35 pm ET)
      5  
      We all knew this was going to happen. But let's remember as well that President Obama, with this one salute did more to pay honor to our troops who were lost in action than George W. Bush did in eight years.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pezzimiztix (October 29, 2009 1:54 pm ET)
        7
      you can tell when the left is trying desperately to face the truth. there is no finer example of this than the posts listed below - the bush comments surface again. the fact is, the public hears obama saying the real war on terror is in afghanistan and it MUST be won. fine. his appointed general requests more troops to succeed. obama takes his time to ensure 'best decision'? what info does he have that the GENERAL doesn't that could influence his decision? and all the while he leaves the TROOPS HE ALREADY committed to fend for themselves. he rushes to close gitmo, rams stimulus (which he didn't read), now health care - but now all of a sudden he wants to take his time when americans are dying? can anyone in here please explain this logic to me. thanks.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (October 29, 2009 2:42 pm ET)
        4  
        Sorry, but you are full of it. If you can only post talking points, you have no legitimacy.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by abetteramerica (October 29, 2009 2:55 pm ET)
        4  
        Its called big picture thinking. When you have a government in Afghanistan that a chunk of their population doesn't trust due to various issues, a nuclear Pakistan which is also under attack, persistent attacks in Iraq and added issues with Iran... a full comprehensible strategy is needed. And just appeasing the instant gratification needs of our society with a chunk of troops that are over worked without a clear goal or even a stable afghan government to work with, would that not cause more harm?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by epkklk851 (October 29, 2009 4:04 pm ET)
          3  
          Currently, we are also increasing our presence in Pakistan. Yesterday, a woman's market was bombed with our Secretary of State in the country. Her press corps slept in ConExes on the embassay compound. This area is dangerous and unstable, we must be very, very careful because a lot of people could die, here and there.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (October 29, 2009 4:33 pm ET)
        3  
        can anyone in here please explain this logic to me

        Did you even think for one second about our soldiers in Afghanistan prior to last November's elections?

        I. Don't. Think. So.

        Also, Gitmo hasn't closed yet, the stimulus had to be "rammed" because we were on the brink of a depression, and health care has been an issue since the 1950's.

        You're welcome.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Boxer1979 (October 29, 2009 5:21 pm ET)
        2  
        Um, there are already over a 100,000 troops there already. 68,000 are American troops. Keep in mind President Obama sent an additional 17,000 troops to Afghanistan a little under a month after he took office. DO RESEARCH PEZZY!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mescal (October 29, 2009 7:08 pm ET)
        2  
        Pez, since you are so committed to the idea of raising troop levels in Afghanistan, we congratulate you on your decision to enlist in the military and serve a few tours over there.

        Otherwise, you're just another squawking chickenhawk who is anxious to celebrate his own manhood by watching OTHERS fight and die for your 'ideals'.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Barry Bonds (October 29, 2009 1:55 pm ET)
      4  
      If you think about it Glenn Beck is an entertainer. He probably doesn't believe 70% of the stuff he says.

      With that understanding you have to feel sorry for the guy. He has to feel sick to his stomach everyday he has to make these kind of disgusting comments to keep his job.

      I actually feel a sadness for all of these guys, Rush Limbaugh especially because he has been doing this for 20 years. You know that has to do something to his mental state. I truly believe these are sad, sad, sad people.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MaineiacMan (October 29, 2009 2:02 pm ET)
          5
        Cudo's to President Obama for being there. Shame on President Obama for turning it into a photo shoot. He could have paid his respects 'in-private' but he had a cameraman there to shoot pictures....much like handing out white lab coats to doctors in the Roas Garden. God bless our soldiers who fight on, waiting for a clear direction and directive from the White House.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (October 29, 2009 4:35 pm ET)
          4  
          In case you missed it, there are photographers around the president every time he does anything even remotely in public and many times in private as well.

          Mission Accomplished with the codpiece on the aircraft carrier was a photo op. This wasn't.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by MaineiacMan (October 29, 2009 4:49 pm ET)
              1
            And the President has the power to have that moment without releasing a photo, Pres O. WANTED to release the photo. He turned it into a photo op. I think he would have been smarter to leak a statement to the media saying that he went to Dover at midnight to observe the arrival of our fallen soldiers WITHOUT the photo.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by MaineiacMan (October 29, 2009 9:29 pm ET)
              1
            In case you didnt notice, the President has the ability to have a moment go 'unphotographed' (especially in a controlled environment like the AFB in Dover at midnight). Even if it is the 'Official White House photographer', the President has the ability not to release a photo to the press. This President chooses to put his face in the media as much as possible, giving others the chance to say 'is it always about him'? He could have had that moment at midnight in Dover to himself if he chose to. He didnt. He treated it like a photo op., kind of sad. Just think, if Gibbs or someone leaked a statement to the media stating that the President was at Dover AFB to observe our fallen heros arriving and there was no public photo....wouldnt it seem more heartfelt and legit, more personal?
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (October 29, 2009 2:08 pm ET)
        5  
        I find it hard to feel sad for a guy who makes many millions of dollars spewing vicious and damaging disinformation. There is honest work he could be doing. Instead, he's one of Rupert's whores.

        Apologies to honest prostitutes, for whom I do feel sad.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (October 29, 2009 2:48 pm ET)
          2  
          "I find it hard to feel sad for a guy who makes many millions of dollars spewing vicious and damaging disinformation. There is honest work he could be doing. Instead, he's one of Rupert's whores."



          Agreed. I have no sympathy for a self-admitted "rodeo clown" who foments sedition against the lawfully elected US government [Beck], or a fat, drug-addicted pedophile shock jock who's on record as hoping the President fails [Limpballs] . . .
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Barry Bonds (October 29, 2009 5:46 pm ET)
          3  
          You're right.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (October 29, 2009 2:21 pm ET)
        3  
        One has to have a conscience to feel . . . based upon their actions, neither Rush nor Beck feel anything. They are narcissists. Narcissists don't feel anything for others, just themselves.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by aBeck in 10-O-C (October 29, 2009 3:29 pm ET)
        3  
        No disrespect to your laudable human compassion, Barry.

        Rush and Beck are sad examples of people because they do what they do knowing that it is wrong, but for political or financial ends and fame that is craven and cynical and immoral. They sleep and digest meals just fine. They are rich and famous by providing a service, or a cause if you will, for the sad,sad,sad,people who want to feel part of something important, like the kids who dress up in super-hero garb to fight crime in their bedrooms. Beck and Limbaugh fabricate all of the evil and enemies that these sad people require to wage their comic book battle for truth justice and the American way.
        They exhort these people to support a conservative agenda that exploits the weak for endless power and wealth. And that is why the wealthy and powerful love Rush and Beck.

        The next time you see the video of Rush's rapturous reception at the CPAC convention last year, look closely at his face. It is flush with an orgasmic excitement that is positively child-like...with recognition of his own glorious greatness....but a face devoid of human humility. He IS one of those kids in his super hero suit that has graduated from a comic book crusade in his bedroom, to a real- world adulation. It makes you wonder who would not sell their very soul to experience that same rock star celebrity. Glenn Beck? Michelle Malkin? They all sleep at night, just fine.
        And why not. They have wealth, fame, and influence ...and health insurance. What a country, huh?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Barry Bonds (October 29, 2009 5:46 pm ET)
          2  
          You're right.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by aBeck in 10-O-C (October 29, 2009 9:42 pm ET)
            1  
            No disrespect to your laudable human compassion, Barry.


            Seriously Barry.....would you believe that I wish I were more like you....if I could only pity the Becks and Limbaughs rather than detest them.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by lewislaw7153 (October 29, 2009 2:18 pm ET)
      3  
      "GEORGE BUSH DIDN'T GOLF DURING THE WAR"

      Is the WAR over, Becky?

      BUBBLE: "NOW WATCH THIS SWING"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DeirdreFlanagan6 (October 29, 2009 2:47 pm ET)
      2  
      How did Beck feel when he returned after his military service? Probably the same as O'Reilly, Levin, Hannity, Rove, Cheney and even the 'gone missing' GWB....he felt nuthin cause he's never served anyone but Glenn...just like all the others. Shame on all of them.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (October 29, 2009 5:23 pm ET)
      2  
      Offended Beck claims Obama "used the troops coming home in coffins as a photo-op"

      Just like your show offends the intelligent, because we all know it is a money-op.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hezaa (October 29, 2009 7:43 pm ET)
      1  
      Revisionist history much? Bush was constantly on his ranch and golfing during the war! Constantly! argh!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MaineiacMan (October 30, 2009 8:46 am ET)
          1
        For crying out loud there is an entire slideshow of Pres O. at Dover AFB at the Wall Street Journal's web site now. I was willing to give him a pass and call it poor judgement to release one picture but now there are more. He didnt do this as a matter of personal reflection or as a solemn salute to our fallen hero's. He used our fallen hero's as a prop in a photoshoot to look Presidential. EVERYTHING is a photo shoot to him.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by MaineiacMan (October 30, 2009 9:25 am ET)
          1
        Can we please stop the nonsense.

        It took Pres Bush 2 years and 9 months to play the same amount of golf (24 hours) that Pres Obama has played in the first 10 months of his Presidency. And you know what, that FACT doesnt matter to me as much as your lie matters to you.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mescal (October 30, 2009 5:24 pm ET)
          1  
          Well, can you address Dubya's bullsh*t claim that he gave up playing golf out of respect to those who had fought and died in Iraq? Turned out that he TEMPORARILY gave up golf due to a knee injury. As soon as his knee had healed, he went right back to playing golf, even doubling with his dad at a republican fund raising event.

          Did this Bush lie (one more among myriad lies) about playing golf while American soldiers died outrage you also?

          If not, then YOU HAVE NO POINT!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by thebigsheister (October 29, 2009 8:06 pm ET)
      1  
      Wait, there's no golf during wartime? Is masturbation still cool?
      Report Abuse