About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Beck tries to tie Obama to 70 million deaths by putting his words in Mao's mouth

October 23, 2009 12:26 pm ET

From the October 23 edition of Premier Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by usp (October 23, 2009 12:30 pm ET)
      6  
      i think he just broke. he stopped making any sense at all.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (October 23, 2009 12:50 pm ET)
        5  
        His math's a bit shaky, too. Mao killed "about two-and-a-half million a year..." If Obama is trying to Mao us, he's about 2/3 million short, eleven months into his first year.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Conchobhar (October 23, 2009 12:52 pm ET)
          9  
          That should be "2.3 million short."

          4/3 of all people have trouble with fractions.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Übermensch (October 23, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
            7  
            just like:

            There are three types of people in this world, those who can count...and those who can't
            Report Abuse
            • Author by John Paradox (October 23, 2009 2:10 pm ET)
              5  
              There are 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary.....
              Report Abuse
            • Author by eweston8542983 (October 23, 2009 5:16 pm ET)
              3  
              I always prefered,"There are two kinds of people. Those who think there are two kinds of people, and those who don't."
              Report Abuse
      • Author by lewislaw7153 (October 23, 2009 3:02 pm ET)
        1  
        He's BOTSO alright, I agree!! And ya know what . .

        They're coming to take HIM away, ha-haaa!!

        They're coming to take HIM away, ho-ho, hee-hee, ha-haaa

        To the funny farm. Where life is beautiful all the time and HE'LL be
        happy to see those nice young men in their clean white coats and they're
        coming to take HIM away . .

        Ha-haaa!!!!!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by tman418 (October 24, 2009 2:29 am ET)
             
          What does "BOTSO" stand for?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by SoloPocono (October 24, 2009 4:17 am ET)
             
          hahaa, I HAVE that clip from Dr Demento!! AND-I've wished I knew more about putting videos to songs/word. God knows, it's absolutely PERFECT for King Beck!!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by noneyabidnis (October 23, 2009 12:41 pm ET)
      3  
      They think this is all one big game.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by SMTDL (October 23, 2009 12:50 pm ET)
        5  
        That is pathetic..joking about the deaths of millions of people ..for what?... to make a false connection to the President of the United States!!! How can anyone listen to this drivel!!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Conchobhar (October 23, 2009 12:54 pm ET)
          4  
          People? What people? We're talkin' Chicoms here!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by SoloPocono (October 24, 2009 4:24 am ET)
            1  
            "Chicoms"? And here I'm telling my kids that mom is now a Socialist, Fascist, Marxist, Communist, Chicago Mobster!!
            (which is an absolute complement considering what some of the local fanatic Beck zombies have called me...)
            ooops-nevermind-I see what you meant by above-lol, sorry!! It takes me a few minutes sometimes. Maybe it's NOT the dialysis..maybe my mind is going from watching Beck 5 times/week...? :0
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Major Tom (October 23, 2009 12:56 pm ET)
        6  
        Of course he sees it that way... Why else have the phone in his studio? Beck isn't really looking for corrections... He is looking for self aggrandizement. This is all a game to him...
        But not everyone on the right believes that... I read a story today that quoted Luntz as saying Roger Ailes should run for pres in 2012. Fox and it's cohorts are on full attack, to them it is not a game, it is a power play for sole rights to control the nation's flow of information.
        I'm angry... I was frusterated with the back and forth a few weeks ago, but I have devolved into full-on anger. I hate to admit that, but I'm losing faith in our society, and sizable faction of this country that is dreaming up military coups and attempting to defame anything or anyone remotely progressive... And the media is playing the role of defender of Fox and the lunatics... If you're the last sane man, does that make you insane?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by srichardson (October 23, 2009 1:49 pm ET)
          4  
          After this little shenanigan, Fox really should get rid of Beck. This is way beyond anything he's done before. I understand why you are angry, I'm angry as well. It is time that our liberal leaning talk show host like Olbermann and Maddow start called out Glenn Beck for what he is. I doubt that the majority of the country even realize how hateful and damaging this guy really is. Everytime Beck says something this insane, this nasty, this slanderous, those hosts need to put it on their show. Maybe then the majority of the country will get mad enough do something to get this guy off of our airwaves. This isn't playtime anymore. It's downright dangerous. Those wingnuts who are listening to the dumb%#& will be buying more guns, will be carrying those guns with the assumption that Obama and his team of henchmen will be coming for them soon enough.
          Maybe if Maddow and Olbermann pick up on this kind of hateful rhetoric, the rest of the so called left-leaning media will put it on their airwaves then the country as a whole will know the damage one man can do.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Major Tom (October 23, 2009 2:12 pm ET)
            2  
            The only solution is to educate the public on Beck, and/or marginalize Fox's influence over the media by the public shunning the network.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by SoloPocono (October 24, 2009 4:45 am ET)
              1  
              MSNBC and the others DO follow this dangerous rhetoric. As do some of the folks at CNN. I'm getting the feeling that they've been told to "chill" a bit.
              It's obvious how REALLY Dangerous this is getting-but trying to "educate" Becks Zombies is next to impossible. Believe me-I live in a small town where over 95% of the residents believe he's the next "Walter Cronkite", (despite what he babbled about Walter last night). Did you guys see or hear O'Reilly's show a week or so ago, when Beck "slipped" and called his viewers "Zombies"? They were talking about the Flu Vaccine.
              Dangerous? This guy is a terrifying Psycho-Sociopath with Rupert Murdoch, and Ailes behind him all the way--seeing how far they can push before one of tow things-or both, happens. 1. The WhiteHouse continues to after them, they continue to step up the dangerous rhetoric about Obama "taking away all our freedoms", until someone finds a way to knock Beck's insanity off the air-which is guaranteed to light the spark of the powder keg they've been building for months.
              OR/and 2. someone takes a shot at the President-in which case you KNOW people will rise up against Fox, and create a social/racial nightmare for years to come.
              OR, things will just keep slowly building until one or both of the above will occur.
              Any way you look at it, Fox is determined to play this out-as is their "Star". They're too obsessed with their own greed for power and wealth. And are amassing their followers to fight for them to keep it.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by neon desert (October 23, 2009 1:13 pm ET)
        6  
        When you're whole purpose for existence is to gain lots of money and name recognition, it IS a game.

        When you truly believe that capitalism (a term so often misused as a generalization of absolutely free trade) is the universal serum for all that ails society, consequences of ANY actions taken to achieve financial success are justified. Beckk's no different than limpaugh, hannitard, coulter, Fox News, et al in that they bear no guilt for receiving their outsized compensation for selling ignorance to the public. They're perfectly content. In fact, the more the country suffers from the ignorance of it's public, the better they do. They're just too dumb to recognize the pain. Ironically, these folks who cry about their "love of country" and tout their patriotism the loudest are the biggest detriment to the state of it. They just don't really understand how it all works, but are determined to foist their ignorance on the rest of society.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (October 23, 2009 2:02 pm ET)
        3  
        Beck thinks of this in the same terms of his old radio DJ days. It's about getting his name out there and being tops in the ratings. A man who would call a friend's wife on air and taunt her about her recent miscarriage has absolutely no soul. The people who believe this man have no brains.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by oldmaninblackforest (October 23, 2009 12:48 pm ET)
      1 9
      i think this is hilarious.... Does anyone think that it's OK for mao to be one of dunns favorite two philosophers she turns to.....?

      Am I wasting my time on this site??? I don't particularly want to change anyone's mind... I'm more interested in trying to understand how and why others have the opinions they do... I watched this GB segment twice and do not understand how this has ANYTHING to do with "putting HIS words in maos mouth???
      Report Abuse
      • Author by retiredinsf (October 23, 2009 1:05 pm ET)
        1 9
        "i think this is hilarious.... "

        You will see the folks who post on MMFA are indeed funny. Only thing is they are seriously trying to be serious!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (October 23, 2009 1:27 pm ET)
          6  
          You will see the folks who post on MMFA are indeed funny. Only thing is they are seriously trying to be serious!
          You haven't demonstrated the ability to understand any of the posts here yet. You probably shouldn't try to analyze them, either.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Conchobhar (October 23, 2009 1:40 pm ET)
            4  
            Spot on, Easy.

            Some of us (you, as a matter of fact, most effectively) are often humorously "trying to be serious."
            Report Abuse
            • Author by christopher howard (October 23, 2009 2:54 pm ET)
              5  
              "I watched this GB segment twice and do not understand how this has ANYTHING to do with "putting HIS words in maos mouth???"

              Then you have problems with listening comprehension. Beck & Co. conflate Beck with Obama multiple times throught the sarcastic device of "oh, Mao didn't want to kill millions, but he was just cleaning up the mess of the last regime." They were clearly refencing what has been said about Obama cleaning up Bush's mess.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by christopher howard (October 23, 2009 3:53 pm ET)
                3  
                "Beck & Co. conflate Mao with Obama multiple times throught the sarcastic device of..."

                I meant to say.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (October 23, 2009 1:10 pm ET)
        9  
        "Am I wasting my time on this site???"

        Not just yours.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by puppienrainbows (October 23, 2009 1:11 pm ET)
          14
        Mmfa does exactly what they excoriate the msm of doing, hoping and knowing the mmfa lemmings won't and don't listen to or watch the shows they are showcasing as examples of 'misinformation'.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (October 23, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
          4  
          Prove it, P&R(I).
          Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (October 23, 2009 1:52 pm ET)
          6  
          I know thats why they provide the transcripts and/or audio.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by SoloPocono (October 24, 2009 5:08 am ET)
          1  
          Sorry puppy that you've missed so many posts. I've seen quite a few here that watch the shows we showcase-including myself. Unfortunately though-I don't watch by choice. I'm kinda stuck in dialysis for 4 hours every afternoon-and the one large screen TV is ALWAYS on Fox. I requested more than a few times-even speaking to administration-if we could PLEASE watch something different. The response was "Find someplace else to take you on dialysis". I also have glaucoma and don't drive-the next nearest dialysis is a $200/day taxi fee. I've tried to ignore it-with headphones, books, iPod...with only 4 chairs in front of the TV-and everyone else in a trance watching-it's just not very pleasant. SO, instead, I began watching every day, recording it even, and coming home to research the FACTS to present to him. You know, because he's constantly PLEADING for someone to prove him wrong. After over 3 weeks of sending emails, and calling in to the radio show as well as Fox--funny, but he never mentioned the videos or official documents I sent proving many of his "theories" and "connections", WRONG.
          Since you and your other rt-wing buddies are here on MMFA, and obviously watch the shows-If you actually LISTEN to these clips, READ the articles and blogs--you already KNOW about all the lies.
          Perhaps you're just to "proud" and "Patriotic" to admit you've made a terrible mistake? I know MOST of us here would LOVE to be able to present you with the FACTS--if you'd only listen...
          Report Abuse
      • Author by peace4all (October 23, 2009 1:21 pm ET)
        6  
        this is an awesome thread. when you look at the resident wingnuts here they show you with there own words saying" uh-duh. i don get it. he did not put obamers wurds int moas mouth" which is great because at the end of the clip they are clearly putting things obama said into moas mouth.
        that's why you can't debate them. the wingnuts are so ignorant of reality they actually believe that they are the smart ones. lol
        Report Abuse
        • Author by oldmaninblackforest (October 23, 2009 1:36 pm ET)
            6
          beautiful, answers ALL my questions, well between you and "worrierking"... closed minded kool-aid drinkers. BTW "paece4all" I recently started looking at this site, Yesterday I believe... In any case peace be with you.....
          Report Abuse
      • Author by neon desert (October 23, 2009 1:24 pm ET)
        8  
        oldmaninblackforest:"I don't particularly want to change anyone's mind... "

        Interesting that you don't suffer the responsibility of your convictions enough to hope to sway others' opinions. Those of us who believe we see and speak truth really do hope to change other's minds, because the last 8 years of living in a country where truth is optional, a personal choice borne of clique politics, was a burden - and for some a tragedy - that we'd prefer not to endure again.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by oldmaninblackforest (October 23, 2009 1:51 pm ET)
          2 8
          I don't mind stating my beliefs. More accurately I don't think that my berating other folks and claiming to have all the answers all the time is particularly useful. I would welcome hearing your (most anyones) point of view and processing your point of view so I CAN be informed and make reasonable and rational decisions.

          Let me state an example... Health Care reform... I'm NOT oppose to health care reform. I'm 56 years old and not in the best of health I've paid over a $1000.00 per month for my wife and myself finally giving it up because it just didn't make sense to pay $12,000.00 a year. I did this for over 6 years (self employed).

          I don't have anything against the public option OR single payer. BUT I can't take ANY proposal seriously until TORT REFORM and AWARD CAPS are in place. Why would I cap CEOs or corporations but let trial lawyers reap HUGE salaries?

          If I mention this in the liberal blogs. like this one All I see is ridicule and plain meanness...
          Report Abuse
          • Author by peace4all (October 23, 2009 2:28 pm ET)
            6  
            well, the trouble is that lawsuits are by percentage a very small part of health care costs. and while it might be a valid thing to look at from a fairness issue, it is not very relevent to healthcare reform. the reason we need healthcare reform is so that people stop dying from a lack of medical coverage and so ordinary people don't lose everything they have worked for just because they get sick. the insurance companies are in the business to make money. at one time they were non-profit so costs were contained and people got the treatment they needed. now with the profit motive the insurance companies go to extremes to not have to pay out the coverage that has been paid for by the consumer. the public option is just that, an option. if you like your insurance fine, keep it. but if the insurance companies treat you unfairly then at least you have some recourse.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by oldmaninblackforest (October 23, 2009 3:49 pm ET)
                1
              OK the latest info from CBO is "Tort Reform Could Save $54 Billion, CBO Says" as reported by the left leaning WaPo just a few weeks ago.

              http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/09/AR2009100904271.html

              54 Billion is NOT chump change. $396 dollars PER taxpayer... Hmmm... not chump change. If you would like to save $396 (or reduce the deficit by 54 Billion) send me yours.

              My question... if it's "no big deal" why not add ONE page to the 1500+ page HR3200 (or whatever bill survives) for tort reform, for keeping the trial lawyers from reaping HUGE salaries (like the corporate crooks)?

              While we're at it let me buy health insurance (I'm uninsured) across state lines. I have TWO choices in Colorado tak about no options.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by The_Cat (October 26, 2009 11:08 am ET)
                1  
                Tort reform should be implemented, I agree. Any money saving measure should. The keystone of keeping costs down is a public option, however. By competing with a non-profit, the for-profit insurers will have two choices: Make their rates affordable or go out of business. Cutting top executive pay would be a good start. Tort reform and more comprehensive wellness care also help.

                As for buying insurance across state lines, that's exactly what the federal exchange is designed to create. If you're health coverage plan meets the minimum requirements, then it can be offered, nationwide, through the exchange. You'll have the freedom to pick from any available option, public or private.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by SoloPocono (October 24, 2009 5:34 am ET)
            1  
            oldman-I'm almost your age and had been an upper-middle-class healthcare professional for over 20yrs when I was in a horseback riding accident. I'm now a survivor of the insurances "pre-existing condition" scam. I had a severe spinal injury and required a minimum 6-9 months in Spinal rehab. I barely made it to 3. After just 10 days in traction, the business office called to let me know that my insurance was dropping me for a pre-ex cond. They tried to say it was my genetic disorder-something they'd been well aware of for over 20yrs., but was completely unrelated to my injury. A year later-I'd lost everything-home, car, marriage, and even residence of my children. 2 1/2months in spinal rehab isn't cheap. But I didn't heal correctly-as a result, I'm living on less than $700/month.
            BUT--see, "It will NEVER happen to ME!!". I can't tell you how many times I said that after caring for patients that had gone through the same thing. It did, and it can.
            If you'd like some stats on the results of tort reform-I have several studies done in Texas-which has Tort Reform. It's also the state with the highest rate of uninsured-and I'm not speaking of illegal aliens. The cost of health insurance has risen 300% since tort reform as has the cost of care. They are also having problems with "impaired physicians", and doctors who shouldn't be practicing-but can and do. Texas had a flood of well over 4000 Docs into the State-just within the first year. Unfortunately though-when there IS a case of gross negligence or malpractice-no attorney will represent them. The patients and their families are suffering. Do I agree that Something needs to be done? YES. But as Peace4all says-first and foremost we've GOT to do something about revamping our system, The insurance companies have become nothing but professional gamblers-using the citizens money to gamble and pay themselves off with. When in med school, I did exams and quality assurance for health insurance companies-and have seen things from their side also-BUT, that was almost 20yrs ago-when companies were just changing over, and health care was still the priority.
            Peace :)
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Major Tom (October 23, 2009 1:29 pm ET)
        9  
        Due to the policies of our founders and early presidents, how many Native American Indians were slaughtered? How many people died as a result of the Jefferson Davis, or Lincoln policies? Does this equate with intentionally killing millions? No, I admit, it's not a direct comparisson, but should we discount these deaths? Should we simply gloss over their impact on the murder of tens of thousands? Should we refrain from calling the men who owned slaves after the revolutionary war "founders?" Should we not quote them? No, that's ridiculous. Should we not study, or quote, machiavelli because he wrote on decieving the general public in the interests of consolidating power? Should we white wash the murders that occured by American Soldiers during the Vietnam war or in Iraq? Should we ignore and quarentine parts of history that contributed to wronging humanity in some way? Who should Anita Dunn refer to as her favorite philospher? Perhaps one of Glenn Beck's favorite philosophers, Cleon Skousen? Who has defended slavery, and called blacks pickininis(sp?)? Or perhaps just Adolf Hitler as Beck has read Mein Kampf. Or maybe just Saul Alinsky, who Beck says he hates, yet employs his tactics, and quotes on a daily basis... You guys seem so interested in the past beliefs and aquaintences of Obama administration officials, But you don't seem to give a damn about Beck's sordid past heavy drug use, and history of mocking other races and cultures...
        Do you really believe that Anita Dunn is in favor of killing millions of people? Or do you think she just appropriated MAO's political tactics, like Ralph Reed and Newt Gingrich have done in the past? Do you think it's a sign of fascism or totalitarianism if Rove recommended a MAO biography to GWBush? What is your issue with her quote, and why do you ignore her justification for using MAO, and why do you ignore her use of Mother Theresa as a "favorite" policical philospher?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Conchobhar (October 23, 2009 1:45 pm ET)
          7  
          If you're waiting for a reasoned response, Major Tom, fix yourself a b-i-i-g pot of coffee. You'll be up all night.

          Ground Control
          Report Abuse
        • Author by srichardson (October 23, 2009 1:59 pm ET)
          2  
          Because they are ignorant, that's why. No other explanation. Either ignorant or just evil.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by oldmaninblackforest (October 23, 2009 2:00 pm ET)
          2 4
          Points taken... No I don't think dunn is in favor of killing millions. I do think that she is "un-wise" to preach chairman maos philosophy to school children... I believe chairman mao SHOULD be studied in school (high school) government classes BUT the curriculum
          should at least MENTION the 70 million he was responsible for slaughtering.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (October 23, 2009 2:03 pm ET)
            3  
            She didn't. Listen to the ENTIRE tape, not just the truncated one provided by Beck.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by oldmaninblackforest (October 23, 2009 2:12 pm ET)
              1 7
              Actually I did hear the entire exchange, and you are right I've heard clips cup to make it more directed... This happens on BOTH sides of the political spectrum, including MSNBC, CNN, Fox Hannity, Oberman etc....

              BUT in this case

              What she didn't mention was one of the most interesting FACTS about chairman maos philosophy. "Just Kill 'em"... 70 million... What would you folks say if someone in the Bush admin (who I didn't much like) said hitler was one his/her favorite philosophers???? I don't get it... guess I'm just not that bright..
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Major Tom (October 23, 2009 2:18 pm ET)
                4  
                maybe because it's common knowledge. It's like saying, "don't mention hitler without mentioning WWII." As if, by High school, you have no idea what that is... And as for the kids that don't know, do you really think they were disecting her speech, or yawning through it?
                Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (October 23, 2009 2:49 pm ET)
                3  
                Hon, I don't CARE about MSNBC or CNN, my comments were directed to THIS particular truncated tape.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by Major Tom (October 23, 2009 2:15 pm ET)
            6  
            Seriously, listen or read the whole speech, there was no preaching. Her speech was on individualism, and bucking the trends, not becoming a collectivist and not justifing politics at any cost. You mock people at MMFA, but you don't seem to have all the facts, based on how you are framing this argument.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by oldmaninblackforest (October 23, 2009 4:11 pm ET)
                1
              Well that's why I'm here, to try and be open minded and hear YOUR facts...

              Honestly I find it interesting, seriously interesting that all of us can hear and see all the same "facts" and all have differing views. I suppose it's a perspective, probably based on our experiences and prejudices...

              I am retired "from real work" and most recently (still trying)I have been a horse rancher. I suffer from MD and it makes it a little hard, especially when it's been snowing heavily (like here).

              So one of the things I enjoyed about horses is trying to observe their behavior. With the bad weather I can't get out as much as I like so I've been trying to "observe" listen and read others thoughts. I didn't anticipate and have any idea how so many people can be so sure of themselves or the facts yet none agree.

              One thing about horses, they certainly aren't (generally) mean and disparaging to other horses. The name calling and rudeness on this particular site has been socking.

              One of the things I'm proud of is teaching my children to read, listen to, and at least try to comprehend all sides of an issue. politically I consider myself a libertarian. Pot should be legal, I have a peace sign tattoo on my right wrist, long hair and a beard that rivals old saint nick. I only wear jeans and tee shirts, never a suit or even a tie. I think if you met me on the street you would like me, most people do EVEN if we discuss politics...

              Perhaps this just isn't the right place for me to get educated or try and be open minded to others opinions (or facts if that's what you call them).
              Report Abuse
          • Author by pecst1 (October 23, 2009 3:02 pm ET)
            8  
            Well, as to wasting your time on this site, I'd say "at times". There's alot of snark thrown around and sometimes you just have to skim by it. Other times, I find truly thoughtful people. I guess it's like anything else, take some of it with a grain of salt.

            Here's the thing though. Beck is taking Dunn's remarks about Mao and ascribing the title of "commie" to her and then saying that she and Obama would have no problem with the slaughter of millions. Remember, Dunn also mentioned Mother Theresa, but Beck isn't calling Dunn a Catholic nun. What Dunn is speaking to is the study of political science. It's the study of who gets what, where, when etc. and kind of leaves out the "why". If you look at her allusion to Mao, she talks about fighting your own battles. Never in it does she say it's a communist battle.

            I don't know if you remember in the 80's when, in business circles, many were reading "The Art of War" by Sun Tzu? You didn't have to be a Taoist to follow some of the principles. Patton read Rommel's books on warfare, and used some of the strategies, but that didn't make Patton a Nazi. Thomas Jefferson read Voltaire to help create the Dec. of Independence and Voltaire believed Jews were thieves and murderers and wanted an enlightened monarchy to rule. Last I checked, Jefferson wasn't a monarchist.

            Beck is really insulting our intelligence with this stuff. The world and it's history and it's people are really so much larger than Glenn Beck can handle or wants it to be. That's why he's always talking about fear. That notion terrifies him.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by oldmaninblackforest (October 23, 2009 4:11 pm ET)
              1  
              points taken, thanks for the discussion instead of the attacks...
              Seems to me I use to actually know and believe what you've said. probably I've lost some of it in my old age...thanks
              Report Abuse
        • Author by jonesjax2374 (October 23, 2009 2:07 pm ET)
          4  
          Bravo Major Tom. At last, ground control.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by John Paradox (October 23, 2009 2:17 pm ET)
          3  
          Pickaninnies (Pickaninny, singular). Term used to refer to Negro Children.

          Interestingly, you're making a reference to (now deceased) former, and impeached, Arizona Governor Evan Meacham. Same guy who (ironically, correctly) overturned Arizona having a Martin Luther King Day. (Note: the overturning was because MLK Day was done by a previous Governor, rather than the Legislature, which did eventually vote to recognize MLK)
          Report Abuse
        • Author by tman418 (October 24, 2009 2:36 am ET)
          4  
          Hey Major Tom,

          I don't like the "thumbs up, thumbs down" feature, but I used it for the 1st time and it was on your post. I gave you a thumbs up, of course. Well spoken. I don't think Obama could have said it better.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by SMTDL (October 25, 2009 1:08 pm ET)
          1  
          Well Said Major Tom....Beck's spiel is typical of a political attack ..ignore everything contradictory to what is opined even when its overwhelming.If no one challenges or puts in perspective it gets passed off as fact or worst yet..real news!!Once believed,it's almost impossible to change the ever-narrowing minds that are so vocal in letting that be known!!
          Thanks for a good synopsis!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by srichardson (October 23, 2009 1:54 pm ET)
        6  
        The fact that you think this is hilarious goes a long way is showing your character. And the jerk isn't putting words in Mao's mouth, he's basically trying to say Obama is going to become a Mao and kill millions of Americans. It's nice to know you think that is funny.
        Our sense of humor is based on real humor, not sick humor.
        And obviously you can't even freakin read and comprehend what the title means if you don't get it's Obama's words, not Beckerheads. You're about as unamerican as they come if you can't see the danger in this.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by srichardson (October 23, 2009 2:02 pm ET)
          3  
          I need to clarify the above. Retired just made me so upset with his ridicule of the fact that it's ok to insinuate the president plans to kill millions of people. Beckerhead was using Obama's words to make it sound like Mao's, like it was OK to kill millions of people.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by oldmaninblackforest (October 23, 2009 2:03 pm ET)
          1 6
          Hmmm... well said ROFLOL... ROFLOL.. UnAmerican huh, because I'm interested in understanding what's being said here instead of being close minded, unable to examine my prejudices and perhaps change my mind. Well thank you for your help I'm beginning to understand.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by srichardson (October 23, 2009 2:25 pm ET)
            3  
            Reread the post. Did I say you were unamerican bc you want to "try to understand" why we think what we think? No, I didn't.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by oldmaninblackforest (October 23, 2009 3:06 pm ET)
                1
              This is the quote from YOUR post "You're about as unamerican as they come if you can't see the danger in this."

              FACT is I do not see the danger in this BUT thanks for trying to help me understand YOUR perspective. Seems to me it was a little satire, perhaps I'm wrong BUT I'm not so closed minded that I'm calling YOU unamerican because you don't support the 1st amendment (we do have that little document you know). I never said I agreed I just don't see how it's anything other than humor... mountain over a molehill... pathetic
              Report Abuse
          • Author by JoeSixpack (October 23, 2009 2:26 pm ET)
            3 1
            From what I can tell, you're only interested in rolling around on the floor laughing like an idiot. It's really hard to take you seriously with all that "ROFL" ridiculousness that you feel compelled to include in most of your posts. But hey, at least you're amusing yourself.

            "OMG ROFLOL libruls are teh sux0rz!!!!"

            Seriously, old man, isn't it about time for you to grow up?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by oldmaninblackforest (October 23, 2009 3:00 pm ET)
                7
              Very grown up I must say. ROFLOL hypocrite...
              Report Abuse
              • Author by JoeSixpack (October 23, 2009 3:25 pm ET)
                6 1
                Wow, you really are clueless. I was satirizing you, dolt. See those little quote marks?

                You've claimed that you're "just trying to understand." It must suck to fail so consistently.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by oldmaninblackforest (October 23, 2009 4:15 pm ET)
                     
                  Well if I offended you I'm sorry I don't see too good and I couldn't make sense of that was in the quotes, had to have my wife read it to me before I actually got it...

                  I still don't get the insults, I must really be too old....
                  Report Abuse
      • Author by Ruby (October 23, 2009 2:39 pm ET)
        3  
        Dunn said that Mao and Mother Theresa were the two philosophers she turns to most in order to make a specific, particular point. She then went on to make that point which was, essentially, to fight your own battles.

        And besides, as I've pointed out many times before on this site, just because I might say that Socrates is one of my "Favorite philosophers", that doesn't mean that I approve of the fact that he had sex with teenage boys. You can appreciate someone's philosophies without condoning all of their actions.

        In addition, Dunn made these statements at her son's graduation, which just happened to be attended by a Fox News Anchor (Wallace). Her comments were not a matter of public record, but one of Fox's "news" people (not an opinion commentator) made sure to get it recorded and onto Beck's show. To me, that kinda makes it personal.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by manofmystique (October 23, 2009 4:27 pm ET)
      3  
      This is sickening and un-nerving. You tell me race has nothing to do with this.
      Isn't it amazing that he keeps his job? Beck gets away with it because the President is black. DO NOT TRY TO TELL ME OTHERWISE.
      It is time for white people to stop trying to tell black people race has nothing to do with this ridiculous criticism of this President. The only reason why this is allowed and acceptable- and the only reason nothing is done about it is because their target is a black man.
      I am convinced that Fox News, [Klan]nity, Beck and Bum-Rush Limbaugh is running out of patience with each and everyday Obama sits in the Oval Office. They are also upset that all the attacks and criticism on this President hasn't led to Obama's downfall yet. I also believe they are stepping up their effort hoping their outrageous attacks will lead to Obama's assassination. You can not put it past them. This is pure hate and evil coming from the mouth of these people.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by oldmaninblackforest (October 23, 2009 4:35 pm ET)
          1
        YOU are a racist... pure and simple...

        Jimmy Carter (white) was the worst president in my lifetime. Barak Obama is TRYING to take the title. It's not race it IDEAS Barak and Jimmy are TWINS....

        Report Abuse
      • Author by retiredinsf (October 23, 2009 5:38 pm ET)
          3
        It appears manofmystique just played the "race card"?

        If the glove don't fit, you must acquit.......
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Franco (October 25, 2009 7:26 pm ET)
         
      Does anyone know if Marx ever said anything remotely similar to "we have to wipe out 20%" like they claim?

      Also, not because I'm trying to defend Mao but just because facts matter, I'm sure there were terrible famine and crimes in Maoist China, but not 70 million deaths.
      From sources quoted on Wikipedia: Death Toll Median Average Estimates of 14 Sources = 45.75 - 52.5 million people
      Report Abuse