About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Beck's latest conspiracy involves government, OnStar, and the "possibility" of "martial law"

October 22, 2009 11:55 am ET

From the October 22 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by srichardson (October 22, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
      7  
      What in the world is wrong with this guy? New technology is now considered one step toward big brother overtaking the country! The man is a freakin' nut.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (October 22, 2009 12:15 pm ET)
        6  
        If he's that paranoid he should get rid of his cell phone, Blackberry, etc.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (October 22, 2009 12:30 pm ET)
          4  
          Exactly...because those things aren't allowed to patients in a mental institution. I agree with the poster above...Beck is a freakin' nut.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (October 22, 2009 1:22 pm ET)
            5  
            There is a well-documented history of mental illness in Glenn Beck's family. Other family members (his mother and a sibling) committed suicide; his mental illness appears to be manifesting itself in paranoia.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (October 22, 2009 3:42 pm ET)
          2  
          He should also get rid of any metal fillings in his teeth, a well known transmitter of information to the government.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by jmariemo (October 22, 2009 12:34 pm ET)
        7  
        I thought Republicans loved giving up liberties for safety?
        (The Patriot Act? The Iraq War? AIG Bailout? I could go on...)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (October 22, 2009 12:38 pm ET)
          4  
          Don't look to your right for consistency. These guys contradict themselves from moment ot moment for the sake of ideological expediency. While we liberals are far from perfect, the Republican Party is a joke to any rational thinking person.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jmariemo (October 22, 2009 2:10 pm ET)
            4  
            Agreed. I understand the hypocrisy in my own liberal persuasions (I believe in community, but lack faith when it comes down to the "individual"), but I cannot understand how neo-conservatives' heads do not explode from information overload and cognitive dissonance.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (October 22, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
      19  
      "This is OnStar, we have received a signal that your airbag has deployed. Would you like us to send the police out and shoot you for violating curfew?"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Victor Colorado (October 22, 2009 12:05 pm ET)
      3  
      At some point soon, this paranoid freak is gonna turn on his armed guard and, in retaliation, his paid protector will put him out of his misery.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (October 22, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
        3  
        At the rate he's losing sponsors, that might be a good career move.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by robyn20094113 (October 23, 2009 1:18 am ET)
          2  
          I don't think he will be gaining any new sponsor with GM or On Star, ha I wonder if that's what he was hoping for from Coke?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by fishgirl26 (October 22, 2009 12:23 pm ET)
      5  
      Really??? OnStar?? Oh boy, he's really tipped. I really get tired of hearing this guy say "I'm not saying it's happening but...." It just feeds the madness that is Beck. Someone get this guy a straight jacket. I predict implosion soon.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by achorn316 (October 22, 2009 12:23 pm ET)
      5  
      Descent. Into. Madness.

      Now Beck's car is plotting against him.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by robyn20094113 (October 23, 2009 12:58 am ET)
        1  
        That's why he starts his show with "Come on follow me." He doesn't want to go into that big, deep, black hole of madness alone.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (October 22, 2009 12:25 pm ET)
      6  
      This man is peddling paranoid reactions to make people do and think stupid things! This man is definitely:

      [http://www.anthony-thomas.com/shop/images/uploads/Products/FancyMixedNuts.jpg]
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tuersm3856 (October 22, 2009 12:25 pm ET)
        15
      Yeah, what a kooky conspiracy theory! History shows that governments always use technology to the benefit of it's citizens. Government loves you!

      Oh sure, several hundred million people in the last century were murdered by their governments, but that's because those people were racist counter-revolutionary troublemakers. We have them in this country too, and many innocent people will be caught up in the carnage, but I think we're going to have to get rid of a lot of people in this country. Government works every day to get into a position where they can do that for us. Isn't that so kind and loving of them?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (October 22, 2009 12:33 pm ET)
        3  
        If you have that big a problem with government of any sort, might I suggest that you relocate to where there is none (Somalia)?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Old_Benjamin (October 22, 2009 12:41 pm ET)
        6 2
        Or...

        Yeah, what a kooky conspiracy theory! History shows that corporations always use technology to the benefit of it's cutomers. Corporations love you!

        Oh sure, several hundred million people in the last century were murdered by corporations, but that's because those people were racist counter-revolutionary troublemakers. We have them in this country too, and many innocent people will be caught up in the carnage, but I think we're going to have to get rid of a lot of people in this country. Corporations work every day to get into a position where they can do that for us. Isn't that so kind and loving of them?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (October 22, 2009 2:09 pm ET)
          4  
          "Yeah, what a kooky conspiracy theory! History shows that corporations always use technology to the benefit of it's cutomers. Corporations love you!"


          Well, with all the tax breaks Bubble Boy Bush gave them, I would think so . . .

          Report Abuse
        • Author by tuersm3856 (October 22, 2009 3:39 pm ET)
            1
          Exactly! Corporations have bought out our governments...so when something horrible happens like Nazi Germany or the Red Terror, history will blame the government...not the international corporate interests that propped up these governments.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (October 22, 2009 12:43 pm ET)
        4  
        Why do you people keep implying that Americans will be killed. You are supporting a delusional notion that Barack Obama is secretly plotting to overturn the Constitution and impose a Socialist/Marxist/Communist totalitarian state...and that dissenters will be killed. This borders on insanity...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mjh (October 22, 2009 2:47 pm ET)
          3  
          Doesn't border on insanity, Irony -- it trips right over the edge.

          The reason wingnut screamers like Becky keep implying Americans will be killed is simple: in order to keep their sheeple listeners/viewers in line, they have to keep them scared.

          Scared of what, you ask? Hell, anything -- whether its the "Red Menace" of the 50s, hippies and campus radicals in the 60s, communists in the 80s, or, more recently, Muslims, immigrants, Mexicans, and other brown people, they have to be made afraid of SOMEBODY.

          And, when all else fails, make 'em afraid of the scary black Muslim immigrant Socialist in the White House . . .

          Report Abuse
        • Author by tuersm3856 (October 22, 2009 3:47 pm ET)
            2
          The idea of political dissenters being killed is insane? That's borderline Holocaust denial!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by congero6189599 (October 22, 2009 4:09 pm ET)
            1  
            Beck is shilling for those corporations.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Conchobhar (October 22, 2009 5:10 pm ET)
            4  
            Go away, and don't come back until you've read a couple of books. Start with basic Logic, and then 20th Century History. The Holocaust was a case of genocide. Political dissent had nothing to do with it.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by benjr (October 23, 2009 10:43 am ET)
            1  
            The general point of political dissenters being killed is not insane. What is insane is trying to suggest that Pres. Obama's administration will kill political dissenters, or that somehow America will become totalitarian under him. By the way, the Holocaust had nothing to do with political dissent. I've posted this before, but it is highly insulting to try to equate what happened to the Jews in Nazi Germany to anything that this administration is doing. As a member of the Jewish faith, I'm asking you to stop.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (October 22, 2009 12:53 pm ET)
        7  
        several hundred million people in the last century were murdered by their governments


        Thank god we thwarted Hitler's attempt to furnish every new Beetle with OnStar.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (October 22, 2009 2:03 pm ET)
        2  
        You should have taken more than a cursory glance at History. Had you looked a little longer, it would also have shown you that governments have never really needed fancy technology to murder their own people in great numbers. It's always been a relatively low-tech undertaking.

        They don't need On-Star to round us up.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jmariemo (October 22, 2009 2:18 pm ET)
          2  
          Maybe, Obama is rounding up MMFA members to join his secret communist militia? I bet the Daily Kos and that Huffington chick are in on this too...
          Someone should sell that to Fox with a 'TM' after it. (I want the royalties, Glenn Beck!)
          Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (October 22, 2009 2:12 pm ET)
        3  
        Paranoid much, tuersm?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by srichardson (October 22, 2009 3:47 pm ET)
        3  
        Oh my, there is actually someone out there that believes this crap!! I choose to not spend my day worrying constantly about what Obama's government is up to now. Are they putting little bugs in our cell phones, in our cars... Live a little and stop worrying.
        And who in the heck started spying on the American public anyway? BUSH. So don't even go there Beck and his loons.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by tuersm3856 (October 22, 2009 3:49 pm ET)
          2  
          ...and I've said that Bush and his people need to go to prison.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by srichardson (October 22, 2009 5:47 pm ET)
            1  
            ....and I respect you for that. But my question to you is who were you referring to when you said we need to get rid of a lot of people? The militia or the illegal aliens? The people like Beck and Limbaugh who are promoting hate and in the process of this building an "army" of Obama haters who one day may do something stupid and drastic to remedy their problem? Maybe I am misunderstanding your previous blog.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 23, 2009 5:41 pm ET)
        1  
        Yeah, tuersm, you tell 'em. Damn OnStar always tracking me and talking to me in my head. Look OUT!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jbraskin4786 (October 22, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
      3  
      Does OnStar advertise on Fox?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (October 22, 2009 12:49 pm ET)
      7  
      Customer & Glenn Beck listener: "Hello, OnStar? I want to cancel my service immediately."

      OnStar: "May I ask what the reason is?"

      Customer: "Because I'm afraid we're going the way of the Weimar Republic."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (October 22, 2009 12:52 pm ET)
      3  
      Would someone please buy a new tinfoil hat for old Glennie, his has a huge hole in it

      Report Abuse
    • Author by inkslave (October 22, 2009 12:56 pm ET)
      4  
      Maybe I missed the big announcement that Glenn Beck is a raving moron.

      Or that he makes his sizable living pandering to a fringe element that's still waiting for the black helicopters.

      And where was all this deficit worry when Boosh was running things for eight years, and letting the banks and insurance companies run themselves into the ground?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (October 22, 2009 1:00 pm ET)
      4  
      Glenn is just worried that if he goes back to drinking and driving, the On Star system on his Escalade will be able to pull him over. For my part, the tracking systems have always made me feel a bit weird. But then the auto industry has always been a bit too big brother for me. They have been able to tell if people drove rental cars over dirt roads or you were speeding for many years. (Speeding-no, dirt roads in a park-yes.) Ford used to spy on his employees and fire the "immoral" ones. But, I would rather trust the government rather than a private company.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by robyn20094113 (October 23, 2009 1:21 am ET)
        1  
        Oh, oh Glen forgets, the Wise Men used "On Star" to locate his, precious, baby Jesus.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (October 22, 2009 1:11 pm ET)
      3  
      "The Founders" didn't go for OnStar? Is that why it took so long to develop this technology?

      I particularly love how the right wing nutz cry about the US Government deficit - which they just discovered on January 20, 2009 - yet they don't want the Bush tax cuts to be recinded.

      Huh?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Jurgan (October 22, 2009 1:43 pm ET)
        4  
        Oh, but tax cuts always increase revenues! Haven't you heard?

        Well, except for those lower class tax cuts. Then you're "giving money to people who don't work."
        Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (October 22, 2009 1:13 pm ET)
      4  
      Well, this little rant ought to bring the advertisers charging back to sign up. Starting with GM.

      Right!

      Right?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MagCynic (October 22, 2009 1:16 pm ET)
        7
      Oh, come on, people. You can't think it's a good idea for the government to be able to stop your car.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Ruby (October 22, 2009 1:23 pm ET)
        4  
        The government isn't able to stop your car.

        OnStar is not the government.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MagCynic (October 22, 2009 1:32 pm ET)
            9
          So the you're telling me the government won't order OnStar to stop a potential suspect?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by PurpleState (October 22, 2009 1:52 pm ET)
            4  
            The police could, I suppose.

            But not the government.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Victor Colorado (October 22, 2009 1:53 pm ET)
            6  
            How can you sit there and give credence to a conspiracy theory stolen from Dwight Schrute!?!

            Dwight Schrute from The Office!!!

            Which is on NBC!!!

            NBC's Headquarters displays Communist art!!!
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Ruby (October 22, 2009 1:55 pm ET)
            7  
            If the police are involved in a high speed chase and the car they're chasing has OnStar, then yes, I would think they'd probably utilize that technology in order to avoid potential damage to property and human life.

            So the police can get OnStar to stop the car, or they can chase the car, ram it, law down spike strips, etc.

            And furthermore, it's not like the police can just ORDER OnStar to stop random cars whenever they feel like it.

            And if you don't like it then here's a nifty idea: don't buy a car with OnStar.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by srichardson (October 22, 2009 3:52 pm ET)
              4  
              Why are people so darn paranoid that they cannot see the good in anything? Honestly, On Star isn't going to just start randomly stopping cars in the middle of the highway to try to kill you. Duh, duh, duh. How are we suppose to respond to these people? I'm almost at a loss of words.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by progressiveright (October 23, 2009 2:05 am ET)
            1  
            To get a private company of any type to do something like that legally requires a warrant. That is unless you are the Bush administration.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (October 22, 2009 1:24 pm ET)
        4  
        Ever hear of 'spike strips'? They're used regularly in Southern Arizona (and other areas, I'm simply familiar with reporting on local events) to stop those disease-spreading, welfare-sucking illegal aliens.

        /snark
        Report Abuse
      • Author by achorn316 (October 22, 2009 1:27 pm ET)
        2  
        .... they can't.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (October 22, 2009 4:13 pm ET)
        2  
        You just jump from thread to thread regurgitating Becks talking points. I haven't read an original post from you. SAD!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (October 23, 2009 5:44 pm ET)
           
        "Oh, come on, people. You can't think it's a good idea for the government to be able to stop your car." - Mag

        You mean the police? In a chase, they are already able to run me off the road. I would rather they just make the car stop then chase it through traffic and run it off the road. What are you advocating here?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by chuckyP (October 22, 2009 1:42 pm ET)
      2  
      Worried about OnStar but for the Patriot Act. Sounds a little off to me yet he has millions of listners that is a little scarry
      Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (October 22, 2009 1:47 pm ET)
      7  
      From crickets to foamy rants...

      I doubt many had the stomach to listen to the enirety of this latest rant from The Mormonster, but it ends with: "So why would we trust them with listening and tracking devices? Why would we do that?"

      Hmmm...

      So why then, Herr Beck, when the Dick & Duhhbya show tapped into every single byte transmitted electronically with-fricken-in this country, why did we not hear this same fountain of froth from you?

      Chirp... chirp...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Tiredog (October 22, 2009 2:21 pm ET)
        4  
        Beck: "Do you believe that this government has your children's best interests at heart?"

        Yeah, a helluva lot more than the previous misadministration ever did.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by srichardson (October 22, 2009 3:55 pm ET)
          2  
          Yeah, the previous administration just couldn't wait for them to turn 18 so they could send them to war. As long as they weren't there own kids or relatives going they were fine with sending young children (and at 18 no kid should be in a war zone) over to die for their cause.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by kathy5 (October 22, 2009 2:09 pm ET)
      2  
      Okay - once again it has been confirmed - Beck is a nuttie as a fruitcake.

      Where was the outrage with Bush and the "Patriot Act"?

      Beck is so transparent it's not even funny - oh, and did I say disgusting? Yeah, he's all that and a bag of chips alright.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Margededum (October 22, 2009 2:16 pm ET)
      2  
      Beck really really has a mental problem. In fact I think most of those wild crap spredders on Fox are also effected. If not they wouldn't 1) be on Fox 2) spew the nonense they do.

      This man is going to cause some really really horrible act by a listener of his. My nephews, whom I thought were intelligent listen to him and think people are picking on him. So if they have their head up his butt, what in the world do some of the real nuts out there think..

      It has gotten so, you are afraid to listen to real news, because you are sure some one egged on by Fox news is going to commit a reprehensible act.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by noneyabidnis (October 22, 2009 2:59 pm ET)
      2  
      The 340,000 dollars Glenn bases his entire premise on is an extremely misleading (if not completely inaccurate) point.

      Further, he makes it sound as though we are all going to get a bill in the mail one day for 340,000 dollars and if it's not paid, martial law will ensure.

      If what he was conveying had even a small sliver of truth in it, then yeah, I'd be somewhat concerned. But, since his "facts" have no basis in the real world, and are at best "extremely misleading", I can only sit back and laugh at him.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nMckinnus0035 (October 22, 2009 3:21 pm ET)
      2  
      In soviet russia car drives you!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by albertsenj (October 24, 2009 2:05 am ET)
      1  
      I've read that Beck has been losing sponsors. Any truth to the rumor that he is deliberately trying to impress folks that he has gone over the edge - angling to get a new sponsor - Chock Full o'Nuts?
      Report Abuse