About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

On Maddow, Scahill says "ACORN got pennies compared to" war contracting firms linked to "murder," "child prostitution," "misconduct against American personnel"

September 26, 2009 12:08 am ET

From the September 25 edition of MSNBC's The Rachel Maddow Show:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

REPORT: ACORN OBSESSION: Beck, Hannity obsess over ACORN while virtually ignoring major corruption scandals

Williams tells Hannity ACORN story is "minuscule," asks why he doesn't "go after Blackwater," defense industry, Wall Street

Beck, dismissing Blackwater corruption, says "now let's talk about ACORN"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 26, 2009 12:25 am ET)
      9  
      No joke: A defender of military contractors and their child prostitution rings said on another thread that the reason for the discrepancy in reporting is that ACORN is "today's news".

      FALLS CHURCH, Va. – September 25, 2009 – The U.S. Department of State has selected DynCorp International (NYSE:DCP) as one of four awardees under the AFRICAP recompete...

      The period of performance is a base year plus four 1-year options beginning on September 11, 2009. During the performance period, the customer shall place orders with each company for a guaranteed minimum of $500,000, with a maximum ceiling value across all four IDIQ contracts of $1.5 billion over the life of the contracts. Each company has a contract ceiling of $375,000,000.

      Look! Over there! Acorn !
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jmille426471 (September 26, 2009 1:41 am ET)
        12  
        Hey, there's good corruption and bad corruption, and that depends entirely on who does it. Organizations that help poor people at the expense of big corporations, such as Acorn are by nature guilty of bad corruption, even if they're not guilty of any crime at all. But when giant profit-making corporations are corrupt, its noble corruption, particularly if they're using tax-payer money for criminal activities in the name of KEEPING US SAFE.

        Don't get it? You haven't been watching much fox news, then you would understand.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (September 26, 2009 5:30 am ET)
        13  
        No joke: A defender of military contractors and their child prostitution rings said on another thread that the reason for the discrepancy in reporting is that ACORN is "today's news".


        That statement may all be true, but the real reason the ACORN story is news for the right wing echo nut-jobs, is because they represent black America.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 26, 2009 1:32 pm ET)
          9  
          rw, I agree that's a large part of it but not all. ACORN also represents poor ("immoral" in the right wing view, regardless of how many GOP voters are poor themselves, but only because of taxes) America, and "Liberal America".

          It's race, class, and partisanship, but they don't like to say that out loud. That's why they're reduced to ridiculous defenses like insisting a contractor receiving contracts for billions of dollars today and implicated in very serious crimes is old news, while an organization not accused of any crimes, but caught in clumsy set-ups is a major story.

          The sad part is that they come here to brag and gloat at how they've been duped. Check out how many wingnut posts end with a victorious "ACORN has to go!" or " Fox reporting will dismantle this corrupt organization!".

          suckers.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (September 26, 2009 8:40 pm ET)
            7  
            ACORN has morphed into a way for racists to call black people the "n" word.

            http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/acorn-handy-substitute-n-word-912-ev
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 27, 2009 3:02 am ET)
              4  
              Thanks, Foghorn. That's an amazing video, for a number of reasons.

              * The crazy man who is angry about his Cliff Clavin accent ( Eh-Kahhhn is a frahhhd)

              *The crazy man saying that the people selling the flags "confessed" to being from ACORN( I didn't see this in the video) .As if it was a crime. I got similar thinking from the wingnuts insisting that Van Jones was unfit for office because he said, at some time in the past, that he was a communist.I 've seen plenty of self-described Republicans freely holding office, and I think they have that right.

              * Crazy man playing the victim, following around the outnumbered 10,000 to one black kids, getting in their faces, and crying that he got hit in the face. I didn't see that in the video, but if somebody can point it out, I'm open minded.

              * Crazy Man upset that alleged ACORN employees are at "our" demonstration, contradicting all of that BS about the non-partisan tea party rallies being for all Americans.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by National_Insecurity (September 27, 2009 2:48 pm ET)
            2  
            The Col. nails it: (let's give credit to Kevin Phillips for his fine book Theocracy) The poor are inherently immoral.

            It has more to do with class than race - which is why you'd think they'd like Obama, but they hate him as a symbol of class envy (how can a black guy go to Harvard Law School?).

            Neighbors of mine in the construction business are happy to exploit illegals while listening to Rush and FauxNews. They also happily flipped houses to buyers obtaining their loans with ACORN assistance. I guess that was OK.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 27, 2009 4:33 pm ET)
              2  
              Don't give me credit for that, NI, it's been pointed out by many others. The idea that poverty is the result of immorality is one of the great rationalizations of the right.

              It's pretty predictable to hear callers to righty radio talking about the bad choices and laziness that lead to poverty, sometimes within minutes of a call from a struggling conservative who's sure he's unemployed because his boss didn't get enough tax breaks, or illegal aliens took his job.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by LKL (September 28, 2009 10:01 am ET)
                1  
                My dad likes to call the poverty-as-the-result-of-immorality line of thinking a form of vulgar Calvinism - taking wealth as a sign of God's favor and vice-versa.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by pointofview (September 26, 2009 10:47 pm ET)
            12
          Again, what crap. It has nothing to do with race. Although it amusing to hear all you lefties cry race against any and all criticism of Obama. Maybe someday the loony left will learn that we can oppose Obama for reasons that have nothingggggg to do with race.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (September 26, 2009 11:25 pm ET)
            8 1
            Of course y'all can oppose him for reasons that have nothing to do with race. It's just that y'all choose not to. I guess finding ingenius ways to call him the n-word is more appealing to the reichwing base...
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pointofview (September 26, 2009 11:31 pm ET)
                10
              So please share with us these ingenius ways national or state leaders have used? Do you have any links to support this, or is this all part of your grand nazi fantasy.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by snoopy (September 27, 2009 12:22 am ET)
                7  
                Oh, I see you've chosen to redefine your parameters to a minimal subset all of a sudden. Wow, never expected you to do that... NOT!
                Report Abuse
              • Author by snoopy (September 27, 2009 12:25 am ET)
                6  
                BTW, your list. I'm looking forward in anticipation to your next ingenious spin of denial!
                Report Abuse
                • Author by pointofview (September 27, 2009 12:50 am ET)
                    10
                  LOL....thats great. An "aid" to a state senator. Thats impressive. an "aid"..., a state employee.. are you kidding me....kind of like your "low level acorn" flunkies. You lefties never ever run out of double standards and crap. That alone is impressive. At least you are committed to your line of BS.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by snoopy (September 27, 2009 12:58 am ET)
                    8  
                    Hoo boy, the spin machine is in full swing tonight! How convenient that you ignored the other 3 million + posts, but I expect that out of you. Your commitment to the brownshirt battalion has been impressive! I just love watching the queen of sheep accusing others of having your double standards!
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by pointofview (September 27, 2009 12:59 am ET)
                        5
                      Lets see you spin this as well.

                      http://www.nodnc.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=401
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 27, 2009 3:19 am ET)
                        5  
                        Beautiful list, Pointy. Cherry picking every pro-civil rights move by Republicans over the past half century is quite an argument.

                        Why don't you give a straight answer as to why ACORN is a bigger issue to you than the military contractors accused of much greater crimes?

                        Fail.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (September 27, 2009 8:51 pm ET)
                        3  
                        Lets see you spin this as well.

                        Oh boy, wonder how you're going to spin this!

                        If Republican party loves African Americans sooo much, WHY is the Republican party 89% White?

                        If Republicans care sooo much about African Americans, WHY are the NO, NA DA, ZERO Republican African Americans in Congress?

                        WHY was there ONLY 36 African American delegates at the 2008 Republican convention?

                        You would think that with all that Republicans love, African Americans would make up at 25% of the Republican party. But they only make up 2%.

                        You can site the history of the Republican party but "The party of Lincoln" acts NOTHING like the Republican party since 1965 till now.

                        After the 1964 presidential election, in which Republican Barry Goldwater appealed directly to the white Democrats of the South, the GOP began to consciously morph itself into the White Man’s Party in Dixie. Like the Dixie Democrats, the Republicans fashioned campaigns that essentially ran against African Americans.

                        African Americans are not stupid.

                        We know what code words like "welfare reform", "reverse discrimination" as well as the "states rights" cry of the confederate south mean.

                        We've been told, by Republicans, too dumb to realize how insulting it sounds, that we are being suckered by the Democratic party because the want to keep us on government assistance.

                        You can site old history till the cows come home but the actions of the Republican party and it's surrogates tell African Americans, all we need to know about the Republican party!
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by pointofview (September 27, 2009 1:00 am ET)
                        7
                      And this is good as well!!

                      The Racist History of the Democratic Party

                      http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/3554.html
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by snoopy (September 27, 2009 1:09 am ET)
                        5  
                        So what? The racists left the democratic party in the 60's, they are all yours now! Enjoy, because y'all sure love catering to them!

                        Racism in the Republican Party

                        Southern strategy

                        Racism In The Republican Party Part I

                        Ann Coulter ADMITS the Republican Party is full of Racists...
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by pointofview (September 27, 2009 1:21 am ET)
                            8
                          Nice how you focus only on the history I provided you, and ignore the present day leaders of your racist party and their remarks. Classic dodge.
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by pointofview (September 27, 2009 1:27 am ET)
                          1 7
                          The racists left the democratic party in the 60's, they are all yours now!


                          Lets see how accurate snoopy really is:

                          You cannot go to a 7-11 or Dunkin Donuts unless you have a slight Indian Accent."
                          -Senator Joe Biden

                          Mahatma Gandhi "ran a gas station down in Saint Louis."

                          -Senator Hillary Clinton


                          "Republicans bring out Colin Powell and J.C. Watts because they have no program, no policy. They have no love and no joy. They'd rather take pictures with black children than feed them." -- Donna Brazile, Al Gore's Campaign Manager for the 2000 election

                          "These laws [segregation] are still constitutional and I promise you that until they are removed from the ordinance books of Birmingham and the statute books of Alabama, they will be enforced in Birmingham to the utmost of my ability and by all lawful means."
                          US Senator Robert Byrd,

                          "Jews — that's J-E-W-S." -- Democratic state representative Bill McKinney on why his daughter Cynthia lost in 2002


                          "I want to go up to the closest white person and say: 'You can't understand this, it's a black thing' and then slap him, just for my mental health."

                          -- Charles Barron, a New York city councilman at a reparations rally, 2002

                          (I) "will not let the white boys win in this election."
                          -- Donna Brazile, Al Gore's Campaign Manager on the 2000 election

                          We have lost to the white racist press and to the racist reactionary Jewish misleaders." -- Former Rep. Gus Savage (D-Illinois) after his defeat 1992

                          "White folks was in caves while we was building empires... We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it." -- Rev. Al Sharpton in a 1994 speech at Kean College, NJ, cited in "Democrats Do the Dumbest Things

                          "The white race is the cancer of human history." -- Susan Sontag

                          Wow....good call there Snoopy. This is really to easy
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by pointofview (September 27, 2009 8:13 am ET)
                              4
                            Snoopy....paging snoopy....

                            Still trying to come up with a way to spin all the dem racist comments away??

                            Well, you tried hard little guy.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by snoopy (September 27, 2009 9:21 pm ET)
                              2  
                              Gee, I didn't know I was at your beck and call, massah! Fohgive me, I waz workin' today!

                              What was your beef again? A list of 11 comments, half were nothing more than facts. That's your response to 3 million posts showing racist republican e-mails, signs, death threats, etc. etc. etc.? A 0.002% comparison - hoo boy! Thanks for the ROTFLMAO, it was quite a long day today. I needed that!
                              Report Abuse
                      • Author by SMTDL (September 27, 2009 1:53 pm ET)
                        3  
                        This weak argument is still being used to describe Dixiecrats that became Republicans during the civil rights era!!!!There would be republican/conservative credibility on racism if the rather regualar racist words and actions from the right were condemned (even occasionally) by prominent Republicans.It just doesn't happen and everyone knows it and knows why!!The only racism the right will comment on is what they want to see as racism against white people(so called reverse racism).How can anyone say nothing is about race in the campaign to destroy the current president.Not all of it but its significant enough and you can't miss it..monkey signs,witch doctors,etc..
                        Eric Holder,Van Jones ,Acorn..now Valerie Jarret under attack..just coincidental..right?
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 27, 2009 1:46 pm ET)
                      4  
                      That's pretty funny, Snoop. POinty is trying to eliminate "an aid" from your list, while he's used Bill Clinton's brother (in an undated quote), Byrd quotes from 60 years ago, and "Democratic Leader" Susan Sontag.

                      If sucking was an Olympic event, Pointy would be Michael Phelps.
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by pointofview (September 27, 2009 12:58 am ET)
                    6
                  Lets look at this list of Racist Democrats.

                  http://hiphoprepublican.com/2006/08/top-racist-democrat-quotes_30.html
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 27, 2009 3:05 am ET)
                    6  
                    Just sad, POV. You're only showing that you don't get it at all.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by pointofview (September 27, 2009 10:45 am ET)
                        4
                      Col

                      Since snoopy is not able to man up and address the racist quotes I provided from current dem leaders, perhaps you can soldier up and give it a try.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 27, 2009 1:29 pm ET)
                        4  
                        Maybe Snoopy just assumes, since you're avoiding on-topic questions, that you're just trolling, and throwing out lame attempts to change the subject.

                        How do you want me to "address" the quotes on your list? It's not any great feat to gather up quotes from people everywhere in the political spectrum. Some of those I would call racist, others are more commenting on racism, but sometimes the unaware racist has trouble distinguishing between the two.

                        Aside from the fact that some of your quotes are too difficult for you to understand, some are people who aren't really representatives of the party, let alone "leaders",and they're not media figures, so whoever your source was for this list was reaching.

                        I believe you have one quote attributed to Robert Byrd that is actually Bull Connor, so you might check your sources.

                        Does that answer your question? I think racist remarks are wrong, no matter who's making them, but there is only one party using racism today, in 2009, as a driving force in its crusade against the first black president of the U.S.

                        Now how about getting back on topic and answering the question you've been scared to answer?

                        Why don't you give a straight answer as to why ACORN is a bigger issue to you than the military contractors accused of much greater crimes?





                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by pointofview (September 27, 2009 1:52 pm ET)
                            3
                          Col

                          You are once again confused. Every time you throw this question at me, or one of its variations, I answer it. I think you are having some memory issues. But, if it helps you sleep tonight, I will answer it yet again for you.

                          I do not think ACORN is a bigger issue or problem than the contractor issue.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 27, 2009 2:34 pm ET)
                            4  
                            Oh, I don't think I'm confused at all. It wasn't too long ago, in an MMFA item about the media blowing up the ACORN story out of all proportion, that you wrote this;

                            This attempt by MMFA is truly laughable. This is and was a major story. This group was prominent in the campaign, and to suggest that either 53 million is not a lot of money, or that other groups get more is obscene.


                            And, on the same thread, when asked if you thought DynCorp should be as big a story, considering they receive hundreds of times more money, and are accused of much more serious crimes than ACORN is accused of, you wrote;

                            Had not heard of this story until now.


                            You've been visiting this site for quite a while. Are you still not clear about what the issue is here, or what this site does?

                            You're continuing to be outraged about, and comment on, what you admit is the less important story, because the nice men on the tv and radio have told you to be outraged at the smaller story.

                            You admit that you had never heard of the much more serious story, but you don't seem able to understand why you had never heard of it.

                            Do you understand how self-defeating your arguments are on this topic?
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 27, 2009 4:49 pm ET)
                            3  
                            Also meant to comment on this, POinty;
                            I do not think ACORN is a bigger issue or problem than the contractor issue.

                            Talk about not "manning up". That's the strongest opinion you can muster about the difference between the two? That you don't think one is worse than the other?

                            What other bold stances are you willing to take, you brave warrior? Would you go on record saying that you don't believe that a basketball is larger than the sun?
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by pointofview (September 27, 2009 5:10 pm ET)
                                3
                              Again, you are simply confused. It must be the voices in your head again. You asked me why i thought ACORN was a bigger story...I never said it was bigger, and in fact said I did not think it was bigger. Your response....LOL..is to attack me for agreeing with you. WOW. Must be really hard to be as crazy as you are.

                              That still does not mean that Acorn was not a major story. Time for you pills Col.

                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 27, 2009 6:30 pm ET)
                                5  
                                I can almost see the sweat in your posts, with the "lol"s and "WOW"s in place of addressing the topic.

                                I realize it's not easy to admit you've been duped, but it doesn't help you to call other people crazy who had to point out to you the fact that you'd been duped.

                                What I was having a laugh at is your dishonesty (I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, that you're not still that confused). The closest you can come to admitting the difference in the magnitude and seriousness of the ACORN vs. Blackwater stories is to say you think the much less significant one is not bigger.

                                You really can't go as far as stating the obvious, that ACORN's problems are nothing compared to the corruption of the military contractors, can you? You can't even bring yourself to type what is objectively true to any rational person, that the Blackwater story should be a thousand times more important to our media than ACORN.

                                Would your whole world come tumbling down ? Would that be too much reality for you?

                                Report Abuse
                      • Author by snoopy (September 27, 2009 9:27 pm ET)
                        2  
                        I was working all day. I don't have time to sit in front of the computer in my mommy's basement like someone here waiting in breathless anticipation for a response. But I see the Col. above already pointed out a few fallacies in your poutrage. Love how you use Clinton's bro while ignoring an aid to a senator. Nice! And why wasn't that aid fired for the racist e-mails? I guess it was just because her boss couldn't care if she was forwarding racism on the job. Someone with integrity would be concerned about this making them look bad, but not reichwingers. They looooove them some racists!
                        Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 26, 2009 11:48 pm ET)
            8  
            ...it amusing to hear all you lefties cry race against any and all criticism of Obama.


            Once again, nobody's saying that.

            It's really amusing to see the same gang of non-racists jump in so defensively every time racism is mentioned.

            I can't imagine why that would be such a sore spot with you self-described non-racists.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by DellDolly (September 27, 2009 1:36 pm ET)
              4  
              It is sad that they apparently get away with this type of comment, or used to, anyway.

              It's not true that we reject criticism of Obama (or any other liberal). It's untrue that we can't stomach that, and that we ban people for disagreeing with us. It has never been true that we cry 'racism' against fair criticism.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by mary59 (September 26, 2009 11:53 pm ET)
            2  
            [http://www.salon.com/comics/tomo/2009/09/22/tomo/story.jpg]
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 27, 2009 4:12 am ET)
              4  
              Thanks, Mary, even though the new format cut out most of the cartoon.

              i watched an old favorite recently, Repo Man, and loved a line by Harry Dean Stanton, as he and Emilio Estevez drove through skid row in L.A.:

              "If only we could find out what they owe!!"

              Estevez: They're winos, they don't have any money.

              I'm not comparing ACORN or their clients to winos, only laughing at the gullible conservatives ability to be distracted by the wrong targets.

              Check out Pointofview's silly racism defense on this thread. Like babies looking at jingly keys.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mary59 (September 27, 2009 11:41 am ET)
                3  
                I really should stop trying to post Tom Tomorrow cartoons, but I luv 'em. Yes pointy is in full swing, hitting a lot of foul balls. sort of pathetic, really.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by themidnightreview.com (September 26, 2009 10:21 am ET)
        13  
        The right loves graphs and pictures:
        [http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QHwRO3L07eo/SrtqOlMg09I/AAAAAAAAAGk/ZP4GFeo5uvc/s320/acornmilitarymoney.jpg]
        --------------------------
        The Midnight Review
        Report Abuse
        • Author by rugger69 (September 28, 2009 7:26 pm ET)
            1
          Oh yeah right all those contractors have tax exempt status just like ACORN. I forgot please forgive me
          Report Abuse
      • Author by puppienrainbows (September 27, 2009 12:18 pm ET)
          5
        You, and others, keep pointing out the 'wrong deeds' of others to make some convoluted excuse for ACORN. In your mind, if someone on the 'right' broke a law or laws, then persecution and eventual prosecution of ACORN is unjust, regardless of the evidence. ACORN assists low income families but that doesn't give them the right to skirt the law. ACORN is subsidised with taxpayer money and therefore comes under a scrutiny I, as a taxpayer, am entitled to. You can go ahead and cite all the misdeeds of Blackwater but that constitutes a distraction rather than a justification of ACORN breaking the trust of the American people.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 27, 2009 1:00 pm ET)
          3  
          You've been distracted, puppy. That's all people are trying to point out to you.Is that so hard to understand?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (September 27, 2009 1:40 pm ET)
          7  
          You've got it wrong. Persecution of ACORN by hypocrites is what is wrong.

          If you think that ACORN (with minimal ties to Obama) needs to be prosecuted and that the whole organization is corrupt because of the actions of a few peons, then you should be out in force objecting to any continuing funding going to some of the military contractors with direct and extensive contact with the Bush Administration.

          But you aren't. It's not an excuse for ACORN. It's an indictment of your behavior!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by SMTDL (September 27, 2009 1:54 pm ET)
            4  
            WELL SAID!!!!Couldn't agree more!!!!
            Report Abuse
          • Author by rugger69 (September 28, 2009 7:29 pm ET)
              1
            Obama worked for ACORN as a lawyer how is that "limited ties"? Cheny worked for Halaburton and he got persecuted for it you didn't say it was limited ties.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by jmille426471 (September 27, 2009 6:43 pm ET)
          4  
          Our point is that right-wingers are a bunch of phony posers when they claim to care whether the govt. funds corrupt organizations. If they did care, their main concern would be Blackwater and other defense contracters, not ACORN.

          But as it is, the ACORN stuff is the usual right-wing schtick; feigned moral outrage used to disguise their petty partisan motives, just like with the Clinton BJ's. Same old, same old.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (September 27, 2009 9:02 pm ET)
          2  
          You, and others, keep pointing out the 'wrong deeds' of others to make some convoluted excuse for ACORN.


          I know, what you really meant to say was:

          "I REFUSE to acknowledge the seriously wrong deeds of others who take my tax dollars because I prefer to make arguments about ACORN, because my spiritual advisor Glen said it will hurt President Obama."
          Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (September 26, 2009 3:11 am ET)
      6  
      Jeremy Scahill has got to be the bravest writer alive today.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (September 26, 2009 8:11 am ET)
        6  
        RachelMaddow is right up there with him. Remember the gay Air Force pilot and hero ?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by liberalXtian (September 26, 2009 9:55 am ET)
          13  
          I am alos impresssed by Ms. Maddow. Her coverage of the murder of Bill sparkman has been careful, reasoned, and measued. If it turns out it is not related to his census duties, I know she will say it and move on.

          Compare that to Fox's wall-to-wall coverage of ACORN and it's outrage at ACORN's questionable advice to a PHONY pimp and prostitute and discussion of FICTITIOUS prostitution. I believe that there has been little if any coverage of Mr. Sparkman's murder. They covered that teabagger's bitten off finger more than a murder that may have far more consequences for our nation.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (September 26, 2009 8:09 am ET)
      9  
      Bush 43 and his band of merry men spent billions on the battlefieldin Iraq on a country that has noarmed forces to speak of and got more than4000 coffins toprove it. That cannot be forgottenn neither the political connivery used to get the funds for this "pet project ". I would like to" shockand awe " the GOP "donothing but obstruct governance "lawmakers back into their districts as private citizens in 2010 and 2012 and take US Government classes like immigrants have to.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by donwelty (September 26, 2009 3:03 pm ET)
      10  
      Let me see if I understand this correctly: $53 million to acorn over a 15 year period to help poor and disadvantaged people—that’s no good. Many many more million dollars to Blackwater and corporate executives who brought us the depression by sleazy financial dealings—that’s good. Calling a black president racist and basically finding any miniscule thing to dislike and mention—that’s good. Honoring the contracts of GM employees who are losing their jobs—that’s good. Mentioning a corn and a few minor employees who do stupid things—that’s good. Looking into torture allegations by Bush and Cheney and a lot of other people—that’s bad. Teaching evolution in the schools and basing it on scientific principles—that’s no good. Teaching intelligent design (or creationism)—that’s good. But if you can’t teach creationism and you can’t teach intelligent design then let’s talk about the controversy of talking about and teaching creationism and intelligent design—that’s good. Glenn Beck,explaining the Constitution although he has little more than a high school education—and that’s good. Claiming that global warming is a fallacious doctrine because 1934 was one of the warmest days in the United States and because last Tuesday was cold—that’s good. Having no understanding of science—that’s good. Fear mongering, name-calling, conspiracy theories—those are good things. Decency, checking facts, reporting news rather than pressing an idiotic agenda—that’s bad.

      I understand
      Report Abuse
    • Author by loonz (September 26, 2009 3:57 pm ET)
      8  
      Scahill forgot to mention ACORN's most sinful crime - registering poor minorities to vote.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (September 26, 2009 4:23 pm ET)
      9  
      The right's poutrage over ACORN stems from their poutrage over losing control of the government. They have it in their "minds" that if they concoct enough of a bad Obama vibe, the people will return the country to them.

      How blind can the tiny group of loyal Republicans be?

      For every "obamanation" they tout, the left can tout a dozen or more lingering Bush generated problems. The bury Obama in bull angle allows the left to recapitulate atrocities of the Bush years, which are real as opposed to the fake ones ginned up by Fox News and conspiracy theorists like Orly Taitz.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (September 26, 2009 11:50 pm ET)
        4  
        I first thought "poutrage" was a typo,and it would have been an excellent one.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by National_Insecurity (September 27, 2009 3:03 pm ET)
          3  
          I'd recommend poutrage for Stephen Colbert, but it has an interesting medical definition....
          Report Abuse
    • Author by timeclock (September 27, 2009 10:39 am ET)
        2
      The ACORN debacle is in the here and now. Sure there are things that still need to be addressed from the Bush era but we now have a solid corruption case that will probably lead all the way to the White House. When you have an organization that purports to be all for the poor and then uses the taxpayers money, that is supposedly going to help the poor, to finance political campaigns and political ideologies, then you need a solid investigation of that.

      If you really are for helping the poor and down trodden then you should see it is of importance to make sure they get the monies that is going to ACORN for them. The left needs to get on board with this and show that they are truly the on the side of the poor and oppressed. As of now, America is finding the left defending the horrors that were exposed of ACORN via their "poor people" argument. If ACORN is truly above board then they will have no problem opening their books for an independent auditor. It seems they are fighting that harder than the charges against them. That should raise some flags there.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (September 28, 2009 12:49 pm ET)
        3  
        to finance political campaigns and political ideologies

        That would be troubling, except it's not true. ACORN registers people to vote. Usually poor people and minorities.

        Horrors of ACORN? Independent auditor? Let's start with the TRILLIONS going to the war profiteers and their ACTUAL importing of underage sex slaves and then we can worry about the MILLIONS going to ACORN and their imaginary sex slaves.
        Report Abuse