Limbaugh on Sotomayor: "The court found that she was indeed a racist" in Ricci, "a nine-zip decision"
June 29, 2009 12:59 pm ET
From the June 29 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:
Expand All
Expand 1st Level
Collapse All
Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts
I thought the decision was 5-4?
The ditto-heads are too stupid to probably even know how many members are on the Supreme Court.
They probably think the Supreme Court consists of Diana Ross, Mary Wilson, and Cindy Birdsong.....
Or were you just being called to watch it?
Nine plus Zero equals Ten, duh.
"And this is why brilliant legal analysts are saying this decision when you get down to it is actually 9-zip, not 5-4 when you look at some of the things that Ginsburg wrote about the mistakes and not even hearing the case, not even taking the constitutional questions. And the reason for this is... I go back to what I said at the beginning, and I stand by this."
The complete transcript can be found on Rush's website (for free).
What really matters is that Rush is god. Well, in his version of reality, he is.
I swear, every time this wind-bag spews his waaaaaaaay right wing propaganda, another cluster of his followers become FORMER followers. He's so damn far out there that he's alienating the very people who've made him a multi-millionaire...and I, for one, LOVE it!!
Keep talking, Rush! No need for genuine, constructive discourse. Keep showing everyone what a wing-nut you are!
Rush Limbaugh: Leading the implosion of the Republican Party since November 5th, 2008. (I know, I know...it's been longer than that. But let's face it, that's when these guys REALLY went off the rails.)
He went on to point out that ALL the SCOTUS
justices rejected her (and rest of Second Circuit)
summary judgment. She was careless, they all agreed.
Great quality for a lib, bad for America.
Would you mind telling us how El Fathead determined that all 9 of the Justices rejected Sotomayor's summary judgment?
Or is this just some more Brain Tirds Rush has gotten into your head?
From decision (signed on to by 4 dissenting Justices):
[The lower courts focused on respondents’ “intent” rather than on whether respondents in fact had good cause to act. See 554 F. Supp. 2d 142, 157 (Conn. 2006). Ordinarily, a remand for fresh consideration would be in order. But the Court has seen fit to preclude further proceedings. I therefore explain why, if final adjudication by this Court is indeed appropriate, New Haven should be the prevailing party.]
That reads that dissenting Justices rejected the reasoning of the panel, and they created their own standard for deciding the case. A standard different than the panel.
9 SCOTUS Justices decided her reasoning was defective. Even the libs.
A 5-4 decision in reality is 9-0.
I love how Rush finishes this piece by saying "my interpretation"
since when is journalism an interpretation?