Sessions calls Limbaugh's and Gingrich's comments on Sotomayor "loaded words," says they're not "an appropriate description"
May 31, 2009 11:18 am ET

Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts|
|
||
![]() |
||
"The Elephant in the Room!" trumpeted Limbaugh
"Your to small for the hocky team Karl, but there is a possible position for you," Rush said puckishly.
when and where they are needed.
Answer--No, I do not.
And yet, ever fearful of the Great Gasbag, he bobs and weaves. How sad and cowardly.
Sotomayor should be someone that they celebrate. She's someone who followed all of the rules and guidelines to succeed and reach the American Dream. She pulled herself up by her bootstraps, excelled high academically in TWO of our top universities in the country, even when she had so many barriers in front of her as a minority woman from a poor background. Don't they understand by sliming a woman like this who has achieved so much in her life when having so little is going to alienate not only Hispanics from their party, but any logical-thinking person who is aspired by her story?
This PR smear campaign against her has ultimately failed for them, and I don't think it's going to have much positive effects for them in the future. Obama should be applauded for this masterful chess move. They stepped right into his trap he set for them. Bravo, President Obama!
Sessions was treading very carefully- he doesn't want to look like the ugly bigot he is, but he can't afford to tick off Limbaugh and the rest of the right-wing yakkers either. So he was stuck bleating the "not appropriate description" milquetoast non-disclaimer, rather than saying what any person still in possession of his own soul would say- that the Limbaugh/Gingrich comments were blatantly bigoted and offensive and have no place in civilized discourse.
Nice strategy the Republican party is employing now, and ever since January I guess : their media hacks (limbaugh, hannity, o'reilly etc), they say all the things that Congressional Republicans want said, and not only is the dirt and filth not attributed to them (Congressional Republicans), but they even get to softly disavow (in hollow words) those things said by their media hacks, and appear all fair and clean in the process... nice scheme.
All the things are still said, and all the dirt and mud is still slung, and the purpose is fully served : but the people who all of this truly serves (Congressional Republicans, who of course stand for re-election), they get to ride along all clean and above it all...
Those Republican media hacks don't stand for re-election (because if they did, they'd have been dismissed by the American People in 2008, if not 2006, like so many Congressional Republicans were), they're hirelings, highly paid advocates for the Republican party : they make millions of dollars per year doing Congressional Republicans' dirty work for them, and they do it using our Public Airwaves...
Public Airwaves you and I have absolutely no chance to ever use ourselves, to broadcast our political opinions, whatever they may be.
Sounds fair, doesn't it.