Howard Kurtz's continuing dishonesty about MSNBC
October 13, 2009 11:15 am ET by Jamison Foser
Here's Howard Kurtz today:
If you look at MSNBC's lineup after 6 p.m., Fox isn't the only network that goes heavy on the opinionated hosts.
That's a reference to Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, and Ed Schultz, all of whom Kurtz considers to be liberals. They combine to host three hours of television every evening.
What Kurtz didn't mention -- what he never mentions -- is that if you look at MSNBC's lineup before 6 pm, you'll find an opinionated host there, too. Former Republican congressman Joe Scarborough. Guess how many hours a day he hosts? Yep: Three.
Kurtz does this all the time: He portrays MSNBC as a liberal cable channel by, among other things, pretending Joe Scarborough doesn't exist. It would be one thing for Kurtz to acknowledge Scarborough's existence while arguing that he thinks on balance the channel leans left. But that isn't what he does. Instead, he dishonestly ignores Scarborough entirely. There's absolutely no reason to only look at MSNBC's lineup "after 6 p.m.," other than to exclude Scarborough -- and Kurtz knows this.
Take another look at Kurtz' wording today:
If you look at MSNBC's lineup after 6 p.m., Fox isn't the only network that goes heavy on the opinionated hosts.
There is absolutely no justification for limiting the discussion to "after 6 pm." It does nothing to further Kurtz's ostensible point that Fox isn't the only network that has "opinionated hosts." It does nothing to further the reader's understanding of the situation. All it does is obscure the fact that MSNBC has an opinionated host who is a conservative. It's deeply, wildly dishonest.
Oh, and by the way: CNN has an opinionated host, too: right-wing nut Lou Dobbs. Kurtz didn't mention Dobbs, perhaps because he moonlights for Dobbs' employer.











Palin's book and Obama's bow: a media week to forget
Media Matters: The Palin chronicles
The Friday Rush: A series of conflicts




And despite the fact that after 6 PM, there is a similarity between FoxNews and MSNBC, they are still not equivalent. How often does Hannity run with a falsehood, even after having been corrected. How often does Bill O'Reilly claim to be an independent moderate but then spout rightwing talking points with ease? How often does Glenn Beck, et al, promote and engineer the Tea Parties?
And how often do we see similar behavior coming from MSNBC's crew? Not nearly as often. They don't make the same factual errors on MSNBC, and they don't make near so many. They don't claim to have the moral high ground because they're independent or moderate and then disprove it with their next breath. They don't promote Democratic propaganda events.
Dumbass, Howie.
I do have to say that Chris Matthews seems better now; he seems to be waking up.
...you know since we are bringing up being affiliated with apolitical party.
Similar to, but not precisely like, the Democrats who voted in Senator Moynihan over and over, Buick-driving, cigar-chomping, union racists.
Here is Lou Dobbs saying nicer, stronger things about labor unions than you can get out of most any news source.
http://www.seiu.org/mt/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=1&tag=cnn's%20lou%20dobbs%20and%20FAIR&limit=20
need more:
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/lou-dobbs-attacks-seiu-and-acorn
and:
Lou Dobbs uses Wingnut Front group to attack SEIU and Obama
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qUzPqmoA2I
and:
Right to Work on CNN: Lou Dobbs Reports on the Latest SEIU "Corporate Campaign"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJEjLkwXXfc
You know JoshSN you really should use your computer to do just a little research before you spout such gibberish. Lou Dobbs as I have shown is no leftie and it's quite obvious that the loony one is YOU.
Not only in our world, but in parallel worlds where 'funny animals' are the dominant species (plural):
The answer, of course, was George Voinovich.
But, other than that?
Lou Dobbs has been a xenophobic left-winger for decades, it is just that in the last 5 years or so the anti-immigration movement has provided him with a lot more ammunition so he gets caught up in the Amero-style conspiracy theories.
He's a loony, but he's a lefty loony.
Sure sounds like a "lefty" to me.
Who also happens to demonize leftists. Are you as crazy as that last statement of yours, or was it an aberration?
"...At the conclusion of a report by CNN correspondent Bill Tucker about the Service Employees International Union's mobilization in support of the legislation, Dobbs said, "The American people voted for lots of things, but I don't know a lot of people voted to end a secret ballot."
"In the CNN report, SEIU president Andy Stern explained this point clearly: "This is the worker's choice. They can have a secret ballot or legally affirm by a majority of them signing cards." Either Dobbs was not listening to his own broadcast, or he thinks labor leaders like Stern aren't telling the truth. Either way, we know whose side he's on--he referred to the pending legislation as the "so-called Employee Free Choice Act," and deemed labor's lobbying on the bill a "bold threat."
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3716
Watch the clip from the site I posted . Oops kinda destroys your argument doesn't it. Lou Dobbs is no leftie!
Everyone should go to this site and see the clip of the Lou Dobbs broadcast JoshSN doesn't know what he is talking about.
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3716