About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Speaking of "overexposed" ...

September 24, 2009 10:12 am ET by Jamison Foser

Last week, ABC News ran a segment about the possibility -- promoted by conservatives and journalists but undermined by public polling -- that President Obama is "overexposed." 

The Washington Monthly's Steve Benen points out that this weekend, ABC's This Week hosts Sen. John McCain.  It will be McCain's third appearance on This Week in five months, and his 13th Sunday show appearance this year.  Thirteenth.

John McCain is not president, he chairs no Senate committees, he represents two percent of the U.S. population, he lacks a strong constituency even among his own party -- a party that is pretty widely disliked and has taken a thumpin' in two straight elections.  He is not playing a central, or even peripheral role in the health care debate.  And yet he's on television all the time.

When can we expect rampant media talk about John McCain being "overexposed"? 

UPDATE: For comparison, John Kerry was on three Sunday shows in the first eight months of 2005.  The media treated Kerry like he lost a presidential campaign.  They treat McCain like he won his.

UPDATE 2: Greg Sargent has a response from ABC's George Stephanopoulos to the McCain booking:

Stephanopoulos hit back, saying he has "no apologies" for booking McCain, despite this being his third big appearance on ABC this year. In response to critics who point out that McCain lost, Stephanopoulos also claimed, interestingly, that he'd repeatedly asked John Kerry to appear after his 2004 loss, but that Kerry refused.

I don't have any trouble believing that ABC -- and probably NBC and CBS, too -- tried to book Kerry in 2005.  But that's less meaningful than it may seem.  They were, no doubt, trying to book him in part because he hadn't done many shows.  If he had already been on five Sunday shows in a few months, would ABC have tried to get Kerry to come on?  If he'd been on a dozen in eight months, would ABC have been eager to be number 13?

That I doubt very much.

Nor does Stephanopoulos' response address the fact that one week ABC is running news reports suggesting the President of the United States is "overexposed," and the next ABC is hosting a Senator who represents two percent of America for his thirteenth Sunday show this year.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by The_Cat (September 24, 2009 10:37 am ET)
      3  
      I suppose if I had to pick between John McCain being overexposed, and Dick Cheney being overexposed, I would have to choose McCain. He is at least a senator, and holds elected office. Further, he did actually go to war and put his life on the line for his country.

      Compared to Kerry (and Gore as well), McCain has had a lot of face time. 'Overexposure' is up for debate, but this is certainly an area where the conservatives have two standards in use.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (September 24, 2009 11:27 am ET)
        2  
        Even worse is Liz Cheney. She has no credibility and all kinds of baggage, yet she continues to get a platform. She's rude - she interrupts everyone all the time. She's ill-informed - she didn't have a position in the previous adminstration to 'know' all that she claims to know, and we cannot give her credibnility just because her father told her stuff (some of it likely classified stuff he shouldnt' tell her).
        Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 24, 2009 2:10 pm ET)
             
          As misguded as Megan McCain is at times, she's Chelsea Clinton compared to Liz Cheney!

          ---------------------------------------------------------------------
          IMHO
          Report Abuse
    • Author by epkklk851 (September 24, 2009 11:01 am ET)
         
      What are you talking about, you know that mainstream media is biased towards liberals, that must make John McCain a liberal! (And Dick Cheney, too when you come to think of it. Can his heart stand the strain of such name calling?)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kydem09 (September 24, 2009 11:01 am ET)
        2
      OMG, 3 appearances in 5 months? Wowsa! Talk about overexposure!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (September 24, 2009 11:09 am ET)
        2  
        How about 13 times on Sunday shows this year?

        You obviously missed the point [how unusual for Mr. Black and White]. The point is that McCain lost the 2008 election, he holds no committee chairs, he is simply the alsoran to Obama's win. THere is no real reason that he should be the darling of the Sunday morning talk shows.

        He, Dick Cheney and Liz "I do NOTHING except defend my Daddy" Cheney are WAY overexposed.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kydem09 (September 24, 2009 11:34 am ET)
            2
          I didn't miss anything. I think it's a stupid "false equivalence" that everyone here likes to point out so much. And it makes MMFA look even pettier to focus on something like this. But again, look who wrote the piece -- Foser!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (September 24, 2009 11:37 am ET)
            1  
            I don't care who wrote the article, you missed the point of the article. No false equivalency, just fact.

            BTW, I don't have any loyalty to MMFA, I just come here to see the idiots on parade and comment. It's the idiots on parade who say the idiot things they say . . . MMFA just posts them.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by DellDolly (September 24, 2009 12:40 pm ET)
            1  
            I think you are missing what "false equivalence" is. It's a flawed attempt to say that two things that have significant differences are the same or almost the same.

            Actually, I don't think you are missing that - I think you are flaying about, trying to distract us and derail a thread.

            Comparing the number of times that John Kerry (the closest thing that Dems had to a national leader) appeared as a counter to a Republican Administration to the number of times that John McCain (who wasn't the national leader of the Republicans when he was running - Bush was) has been on the Sunday morning talk shows isn't anything close to a false equivalence.

            And you think that MMFA is being petty? I am not shocked. Nor do any of us care what you think. You have no credibility here based upon your previous posting behavior.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by kydem09 (September 24, 2009 1:11 pm ET)
                2
              Yes, MMFA is petty. You don't want to call it a "false" equivalence, let's call it a stupid one. If you compare the number of times McCain has been on with the number of Obama's appearances in percentages and then do the same thing with Kerry/Bush, I think you'd see something completely different. I'd do the math myself but I don't know those numbers. Nor do I care. Not sure why anyone else does either.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (September 24, 2009 2:18 pm ET)
                   
                It isn't a false equivalence. You don't seem to understand that there is simply no reason for McCain to be on these programs 13 times since the beginning of the year. He lost, he has no leadership role in the Senate . . . why is he repeatedly on these talk shows?

                BTW, I was a McCain supporter in 2000 and might have considered voting for him in 2008 had he not shown such total disdain for his country by choosing Sarah Palin as his running mate.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by twseattle (September 24, 2009 2:58 pm ET)
                    2
                  Trolls fighting each other. Now that's 'Idiots on parade'!
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by kydem09 (September 24, 2009 4:45 pm ET)
                    1
                  McCain has always been a media darling. He could be on TV 52 weeks out of the year and it wouldn't make one iota of difference to me. You said yourself that he's inconsequential, so why get so worked up about how many times he's on TV. I just don't get the irritation that you folks are apparently feeling about this issue. And BTW, I've never been a McCain supporter.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by DellDolly (September 24, 2009 7:10 pm ET)
                       
                    It doesn't matter, troll, if you personally supported McCain or not, and it doesn't matter if it doesn't make one iota's difference to you.

                    Troll.
                    Report Abuse
    • Author by blindmoose (September 24, 2009 11:03 am ET)
         
      Hopefully they talk about ACORN; I need to get President McCain's thoughts on something that the media isn't talking about.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sinfonian (September 24, 2009 11:18 am ET)
         
      This isn't news. As some of you may recall, MMFA did its own survey back in 2005 (PDF), and guess who was the most-seen person on the Sunday talk shows from 1997 through 2005?

      You guessed it. Huggy Bear himself, John McCain.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (September 24, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
      2  
      That's just what I've been thinking. McCain is on the tube more often than the Prez.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by kydem09 (September 24, 2009 1:12 pm ET)
          3
        Hardly, but again, who really cares?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (September 24, 2009 2:18 pm ET)
          1  
          Me. I'm also pretty steamed that that war criminal and his whiny daughter are given as much face time as they are.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (September 24, 2009 1:20 pm ET)
        2  
        That's just what I've been thinking. McCain is on the tube more often than the Prez.


        Right. 13 times, to be exact. How many Sunday appearances must McCain make before ABC says McCain--like they said about Obama--might be "overexposed"? 20? 30? 50?
        Report Abuse