About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Kurtz doesn't understand why people believe health care lies, even as he promotes health care liars

August 25, 2009 11:13 am ET by Jamison Foser

Yesterday, Howard Kurtz was bewildered that the public believes lies about health care.  Today, he (accidentally) shows why they do.

Here's Kurtz today, again expressing exasperation that the media's debunking of lies hasn't worked:

When something is clearly and factually inaccurate, journalists should say so. And the supposed euthanasia panels under the Obama plan was a rare instance in which news organizations did just that. And yet it didn't matter, with 45 percent of Americans saying in an NBC poll that they believe the plan includes government panels that would make end-of-life decisions.

What Kurtz fails to consider is that news organizations have done an sporadic and ineffectual job of declaring falsehoods to be false, as I pointed out yesterday.  And they have done an even worse job of holding the liars accountable.  If you're a health care critic, you can make up whatever damn fool thing you want, secure in the knowledge that even if a few news organizations debunk your lies, they'll still quote you the next time you say something.

Here's an example: Later in today's column, Kurtz quotes Fred Barnes' latest Wall Street Journal column.  In that column, Barnes promotes the death panel nonsense that Howard Kurtz knows and says is false.  Yet not only does Kurtz quote the Barnes column, he doesn't write a single word of criticism of Barnes.  (He does quote Time's Joe Klein blasting Barnes, but doing it this way sets up a he-said/she-said in which some readers will dismiss Klein's views.)

This, Mr. Kurtz, is why people like Barnes feel free to spread lies: They know people like you will keep quoting them as though they are serious thinkers who deserve a place at the center of the public dialogue.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by BenDoubleCrossed (August 25, 2009 12:18 pm ET)
        1
      The first step toward Universal Health Care must be an Amendment to the Constitution. Providing universal health care is not one of the enumerated powers of the Federal Government.

      For The General Welfare:
      1. International and interstate commerce (trade)
      2. Naturalization
      3. Bankruptcy
      4. Coin Money, establish its value
      5. Weights and Measures
      6. Punish counterfeiting
      7. Postal Service
      8. Issue patents and copyrights
      9. Establish Federal Courts
      10. Govern District of Columbia
      11. Purchase real estate for necessary buildings

      See Illegal Health Reform by David B. Rivkin Jr. and Lee A Casey: Illegal Health Reform: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/21/AR2009082103033.html

      Bring John Shadegg's 'Enumerated Powers Act' to a Vote
      It's time for Congress to, "Cite it, chapter and verse." Where do they derive their authority? When they pass new laws or spend taxpayer money, they should be required to point to specific language in the Constitution. The Enumerated Powers Act would require them to do precisely that. Help us bring this bill to a vote.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (August 25, 2009 2:48 pm ET)
           
        Doesn't say anything about interstate highways, or rural electrificaion either.
        Your able to separate the general welfare from the health of a countries citizens. Neat trick, what with the number of citizens losing their homes and those entering bankriptcy because of health costs. Not to mention the constraints to both businesses and workers due to the availiblity and costs of health care today.
        On this issue, the $6000 average cost per person, at least twice any other countrie's citizen pays, is expected to double in the next ten years.
        If this works for you, are you one of the 50,000 employee/lobbist's hired on to protect this cash cow?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by benji (August 25, 2009 1:09 pm ET)
         
      20 to 25 percent of Americans approved of the bush administration at least according to the average poll done sometime at the end of 2008.

      Is it reasonable to believe that of those 20 to 25 percent, 100 percent either claim that they certainly believe that there are "death panels" in the "unfinished" healthcare bill drafts or they are active in either polling or they attend townhall meetings and even get in their own fair share of protesting.

      And of the 45 percent who are polling as loyal advocates of myths such as "death panels", "tea-partiers", "birthers", etc., etc., what percentage do you think consist of that original 20 to 25 percent of Americans.

      `````````````````````

      My point?

      There is a considerable percentage of those who say they still believe in myths such as "death panels" are biased and loyal political partisans.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About the Blog

Feed Icon
  • County Fair is a media blog featuring links to progressive media criticism from around the Web as well as original commentary, breaking news and rapid response updates to major media events from Media Matters senior fellows and other staff.

Weekly Columns

Feed Icon