Roger Simon needs a new pro-Palin talking point. His is broken.

Politico's Roger Simon continues shilling for Sarah Palin on Hardball, where, among other things, he defended her from criticizing for quitting by pointing out that "Bob Dole quit."

Sigh.

That was a dumb point when Simon first made it nearly a month ago, and it remains dumb.

Let's recap:

Bob Dole left the Senate after he had already wrapped up the Republican presidential nomination, and with just a few months remaining before the general election.  Sarah Palin quit Alaska's governorship nearly three years before the first 2012 primary will occur.  Bob Dole had served Kansas in Congress for more than 30 years.  Sarah Palin had been governor for 2 years.  They just aren't comparable situations.

And after Dole quit, he lost the general election.

So what, exactly, does saying "Bob Dole quit" add to the conversation?

UPDATE: It gets dumber.  Simon, later in the broadcast: "Bob Dole gave up his US Senatorship in 1996 to run for president. The party didn't care... he got the nomination."

Once again: Bob Dole had already wrapped up the nomination when he resigned.  Roger Simon, who was "standing right there" when Dole did it, should probably know that.

UPDATE 2: And just for the record, a lot of people think, and thought at the time, that Dole made a mistake in giving up his Senate seat, because it eliminated his ability to make news in an official, rather than political, capacity. That's a Dole-Palin comparison that makes logical and factual sense (which doesn't mean Palin's resignation will play out the same way.) Simon's comparison of the two does not; it's the kind of false and nonsensical line you see a politician's supporters make when they don't have any good arguments. Except in this case, it's journalist Roger Simon who keeps pulling it out.